Ruling
Österreichische Post: no compensation without damage, but no seriousness threshold for non-material damage
- Date
- Status
- final
- Body
- Hof van Justitie van de EU (Derde kamer), UI tegen Österreichische Post AG
- Reference
- C-300/21, ECLI:EU:C:2023:370
What it is about
Question: does every GDPR infringement give a right to compensation, and may national law require non-material damage to reach a certain seriousness? Ruling: a mere infringement is not enough; there must be damage caused by the infringement. National law may not, however, require non-material damage to reach a seriousness threshold. The amount of compensation is set by national rules, provided equivalence and effectiveness are respected.
What this means in practice
Expect claims for non-material damage after data breaches and other infringements, including for relatively minor effects such as anxiety or loss of control; the argument that the harm is simply too minor to count does not work on its own. The claimant must still prove actual damage and a causal link. Therefore document incidents and your response carefully so you can contest damage and causation where that is justified.
The GDPR articles concerned
Source: EUR-Lex, arrest C-300/21checked on 15 September 2026
Summary and practical reading by Praxikon. Not legal advice; the source prevails.
Connections
What connects to this development
Case law
- Brillen Rottler: even a first access request can be abusive if made solely to claim compensation
2026-03-19 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Vierde kamer), Brillen Rottler GmbH & Co. KG tegen TC
- Legal Newsdesk Sweden: paid online publication of criminal convictions is in principle not journalism, national exemptions may not switch off the GDPR
2026-07-09 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Vijfde kamer), ND tegen Legal Newsdesk Sweden AB (voorheen Garrapatica AB)