Digital Omnibus on AI
Current AI Act status, deadlines and what organisations should do now
The Digital Omnibus on AI was adopted as Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 and has applied since 27 July 2026. The law gives more time for high-risk AI, amends Article 4 and simplifies several governance obligations. Article 50 generally continues to apply from 2 August 2026.
What is the current status of the Digital Omnibus?
Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 has applied since 27 July 2026
The Digital Omnibus on AI started as Commission proposal COM(2025)836 of 19 November 2025. After the political agreement of 7 May 2026, the European Parliament and Council adopted the final text. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 was published on 24 July 2026 and entered into force on 27 July 2026. The amended AI Act is now the legal basis for planning and compliance.
19 nov 2025
Commission proposal COM(2025)836
7 May 2026
Provisional political agreement
27 July 2026
Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 in force
Act now
Update deadlines and roadmaps
High-risk obligation deferral
Annex III to 2 December 2027, sectoral products to 2 August 2028
Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 changed the application dates for high-risk AI. The core obligations for Annex III systems apply from 2 December 2027. For high-risk AI in products covered by EU sectoral safety legislation in Annex I, the date is 2 August 2028. This gives organisations more implementation time, but does not remove the need to classify systems now, set supplier expectations and build evidence.
Original
2 August 2026 for many high-risk obligations
2 dec 2027
Annex III high-risk systems
2 aug 2028
Products under sectoral safety law
Use the time
Inventory, documentation and governance still matter
AI literacy: Article 4 was amended
Measures support development, with no fixed individual level
Since 27 July 2026, Article 4 requires providers and deployers to take measures that support the development of AI literacy. They must consider knowledge, experience, education, context of use and affected persons. The law requires no specific individual level, standard course or certificate. Training can be an appropriate measure, but it is not the only possible measure.
Measures
Support the development of AI literacy
Context
Tailor to role, knowledge, use and impact
No standard proof
No mandatory certificate or fixed course
Practical advice
Choose measures and record decisions internally
Registration was simplified
For providers claiming a system is not high-risk
The final regulation retains EU database registration for systems that are not treated as high-risk under Article 6(3), while simplifying the information that must be registered. Providers must document their assessment in advance and national competent authorities may request it. Classification evidence therefore remains important.
Simplified
Fewer registration fields, registration remains
Self-assessment
Must be substantiated and registrable
Public scrutiny
EU database remains relevant
Action
Record classification decisions early
Watermarking, nudifier ban and GPAI supervision
Transparency obligations remain close
Article 50 generally continues to apply from 2 August 2026. Only providers of systems that generate synthetic audio, image, video or text and were already on the market before 2 August 2026 have until 2 December 2026 for the machine-readable marking in Article 50(2). The new prohibitions concerning child sexual abuse material and non-consensual intimate material apply from 2 December 2026. The AI Office gains centralised supervision for certain GPAI-based systems.
2 aug 2026
Article 50 generally applies
2 dec 2026
Article 50(2) transition for existing systems
New prohibitions
Apply from 2 December 2026
AI Office
Centralised supervision of GPAI-based systems
SMEs and Small Mid-Caps
More proportionate support, not a free pass
The Digital Omnibus continues to push proportionate application for SMEs, startups and small mid-cap companies. This includes simplified quality management systems, better access to regulatory sandboxes and implementation support. That lowers execution burden, but it does not remove the core questions: which AI system are you using, does it fall under Annex III, what is your role as provider or deployer, and what documentation can you show to regulators or buyers?
Simplified QMS
Now also for all SMEs and startups
SMC
Small mid-caps get SME benefits
Sandboxes
EU-level sandboxes expanded
Evidence still needed
Proportionate does not mean undocumented
EDPB/EDPS Joint Opinion 1/2026
Proposal criticism compared with the final outcome
On 21 January 2026, the EDPB and EDPS published their Joint Opinion on the proposal then under discussion. Their core message was that simplification must not lower the level of fundamental rights protection. The final regulation retained registration under Article 49(2), although simplified, and added safeguards for processing special-category personal data in bias detection. Article 4 remained a direct duty for providers and deployers, with amended wording.
21 jan 2026
Joint Opinion publication date
Simplification
Supported if protection remains
Rights
Fundamental rights must not be weakened
Artikel 4
Direct duty with amended wording
Source and review
Legally reviewed by Zahed Ashkara on 30 July 2026 against the amending regulation in force.
EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744Frequently Asked Questions
Answers to the most common questions about the EU AI Act
Use the extra time well
The Omnibus creates breathing room, but not a reason to wait. Choose the route that matches your biggest gap.
Secure AI literacy
LearnWize
Do not use the amended wording as a reason to postpone suitable measures. Start with a baseline assessment and build demonstrable knowledge by role.
Identify team gaps per roleRoadmap and governance
Embed AI
Use the extra high-risk time to professionalise AI inventory, classification, vendor assurance and evidence.
Discuss AI Act roadmap