Praxikon
โš–๏ธ In force since 27 July 2026

Digital Omnibus on AI

Current AI Act status, deadlines and what organisations should do now

The Digital Omnibus on AI was adopted as Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 and has applied since 27 July 2026. The law gives more time for high-risk AI, amends Article 4 and simplifies several governance obligations. Article 50 generally continues to apply from 2 August 2026.

27 Jul 2026
In force
2 Dec 2027
Annex III high-risk
2 Aug 2026
Article 50
~12 min readLegally reviewed: 30 July 2026
๐Ÿ“‹

What is the current status of the Digital Omnibus?

Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 has applied since 27 July 2026

The Digital Omnibus on AI started as Commission proposal COM(2025)836 of 19 November 2025. After the political agreement of 7 May 2026, the European Parliament and Council adopted the final text. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 was published on 24 July 2026 and entered into force on 27 July 2026. The amended AI Act is now the legal basis for planning and compliance.

๐Ÿ“…

19 nov 2025

Commission proposal COM(2025)836

๐Ÿค

7 May 2026

Provisional political agreement

โš–๏ธ

27 July 2026

Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 in force

๐ŸŽฏ

Act now

Update deadlines and roadmaps

Related articles

โš ๏ธ

High-risk obligation deferral

Annex III to 2 December 2027, sectoral products to 2 August 2028

Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 changed the application dates for high-risk AI. The core obligations for Annex III systems apply from 2 December 2027. For high-risk AI in products covered by EU sectoral safety legislation in Annex I, the date is 2 August 2028. This gives organisations more implementation time, but does not remove the need to classify systems now, set supplier expectations and build evidence.

๐Ÿ“…

Original

2 August 2026 for many high-risk obligations

โณ

2 dec 2027

Annex III high-risk systems

๐Ÿญ

2 aug 2028

Products under sectoral safety law

โœ…

Use the time

Inventory, documentation and governance still matter

Related articles

๐ŸŽ“

AI literacy: Article 4 was amended

Measures support development, with no fixed individual level

Since 27 July 2026, Article 4 requires providers and deployers to take measures that support the development of AI literacy. They must consider knowledge, experience, education, context of use and affected persons. The law requires no specific individual level, standard course or certificate. Training can be an appropriate measure, but it is not the only possible measure.

๐Ÿ“

Measures

Support the development of AI literacy

๐ŸŽฏ

Context

Tailor to role, knowledge, use and impact

๐Ÿ“‹

No standard proof

No mandatory certificate or fixed course

โœ…

Practical advice

Choose measures and record decisions internally

Related articles

๐Ÿ“‹

Registration was simplified

For providers claiming a system is not high-risk

The final regulation retains EU database registration for systems that are not treated as high-risk under Article 6(3), while simplifying the information that must be registered. Providers must document their assessment in advance and national competent authorities may request it. Classification evidence therefore remains important.

๐Ÿ”

Simplified

Fewer registration fields, registration remains

๐Ÿ“

Self-assessment

Must be substantiated and registrable

๐Ÿ”

Public scrutiny

EU database remains relevant

โœ…

Action

Record classification decisions early

Related articles

๐Ÿค–

Watermarking, nudifier ban and GPAI supervision

Transparency obligations remain close

Article 50 generally continues to apply from 2 August 2026. Only providers of systems that generate synthetic audio, image, video or text and were already on the market before 2 August 2026 have until 2 December 2026 for the machine-readable marking in Article 50(2). The new prohibitions concerning child sexual abuse material and non-consensual intimate material apply from 2 December 2026. The AI Office gains centralised supervision for certain GPAI-based systems.

๐Ÿ“…

2 aug 2026

Article 50 generally applies

โณ

2 dec 2026

Article 50(2) transition for existing systems

๐Ÿšซ

New prohibitions

Apply from 2 December 2026

๐Ÿ›๏ธ

AI Office

Centralised supervision of GPAI-based systems

Related articles

๐Ÿข

SMEs and Small Mid-Caps

More proportionate support, not a free pass

The Digital Omnibus continues to push proportionate application for SMEs, startups and small mid-cap companies. This includes simplified quality management systems, better access to regulatory sandboxes and implementation support. That lowers execution burden, but it does not remove the core questions: which AI system are you using, does it fall under Annex III, what is your role as provider or deployer, and what documentation can you show to regulators or buyers?

๐Ÿญ

Simplified QMS

Now also for all SMEs and startups

๐Ÿ“Š

SMC

Small mid-caps get SME benefits

๐Ÿงช

Sandboxes

EU-level sandboxes expanded

๐Ÿ“Œ

Evidence still needed

Proportionate does not mean undocumented

Related articles

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ

EDPB/EDPS Joint Opinion 1/2026

Proposal criticism compared with the final outcome

On 21 January 2026, the EDPB and EDPS published their Joint Opinion on the proposal then under discussion. Their core message was that simplification must not lower the level of fundamental rights protection. The final regulation retained registration under Article 49(2), although simplified, and added safeguards for processing special-category personal data in bias detection. Article 4 remained a direct duty for providers and deployers, with amended wording.

๐Ÿ“…

21 jan 2026

Joint Opinion publication date

โœ…

Simplification

Supported if protection remains

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ

Rights

Fundamental rights must not be weakened

โš–๏ธ

Artikel 4

Direct duty with amended wording

Related articles

Source and review

Legally reviewed by Zahed Ashkara on 30 July 2026 against the amending regulation in force.

EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744

Frequently Asked Questions

Answers to the most common questions about the EU AI Act

Use the extra time well

The Omnibus creates breathing room, but not a reason to wait. Choose the route that matches your biggest gap.

Secure AI literacy

LearnWize

Do not use the amended wording as a reason to postpone suitable measures. Start with a baseline assessment and build demonstrable knowledge by role.

Identify team gaps per role

Roadmap and governance

Embed AI

Use the extra high-risk time to professionalise AI inventory, classification, vendor assurance and evidence.

Discuss AI Act roadmap