ControlApplicablev1.0.0

Oversight during the test, incident reporting and recall procedure

The market surveillance authority may inspect unannounced. On a serious incident you report, take immediate mitigation or suspend, and you must have a procedure in place in advance for prompt recall of the system.

The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map

Address and citation

This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.

Identifier: praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:article-60-oversight-and-incident-response
Payload hash (sha256): 2d0f4824005cd8bf8954ca788130a98e43e23a7466fef11bc5926012b07d9d63

Citation line

Praxikon, "Oversight during the test, incident reporting and recall procedure", praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:article-60-oversight-and-incident-response@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 2d0f4824005cd8bf8954ca788130a98e43e23a7466fef11bc5926012b07d9d63

Version: 1.0.0
Legal time (effective_at): 8 August 2026
Knowledge time (known_at): 8 August 2026
Closed on: Not closed
Application date: 2 August 2026
Topics: innovation

Review status: Editorially reviewed (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.

What this object links to

Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.

The obligation this hangs off

1 of 1 shown

The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.

Source
This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.
- EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
  Locator: Article 60(1)-(4), Article 60(9), Article 113
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
  Open official source
Via
- Condition | allApplies throughout the entire duration of the testing in real world conditions, and on its completion, suspension or termination.
- ExceptionThe Regulation provides no exception to the duty to report a serious incident or to the inspection powers. The reporting route itself runs through Article 73, which governs the deadlines and the manner of reporting.
As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.
Consequence
- ObligationArticle 60: testing in real world conditions outside a sandbox
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-60-real-world-testing

What this object is about

2 of 2 shown

The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.

Source
This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.
- EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
  Locator: Article 60(1)-(4), Article 60(9), Article 113
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
  Open official source
Via
- Condition | allApplies throughout the entire duration of the testing in real world conditions, and on its completion, suspension or termination.
- ExceptionThe Regulation provides no exception to the duty to report a serious incident or to the inspection powers. The reporting route itself runs through Article 73, which governs the deadlines and the manner of reporting.
As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.
Consequence
- ActorDeployer
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:deployer
- ActorProvider of an AI system
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider

What points at this object

Where this control comes from

1 of 1 shown

This is what keeps compliance in place over time, periodic or event-driven.

Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
- EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
  Locator: Article 60(1)-(4), Article 60(9), Article 113
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
  Open official source
Via
- Condition | allApplies where you are a provider or prospective provider of an Annex III high-risk AI system and you want to test it in real world conditions outside an AI regulatory sandbox, before placing it on the market or putting it into service. If you are established outside the Union, Article 60(4), point (d), requires you to appoint a legal representative established in the Union; that is a different figure from the authorised representative under Article 22.
- ExceptionArticle 60(1), third subparagraph, leaves Union and national law on real-world testing of high-risk systems related to products under the Annex I harmonisation legislation unaffected. Article 60(4), point (i), contains a law enforcement carve-out: where seeking informed consent would prevent the system from being tested, testing may proceed without consent, provided the testing and its outcome have no negative effect on the subjects and their personal data are deleted after the test. For the systems referred to in Annex III, points 1, 6 and 7, in law enforcement, migration, asylum and border control, registration runs through the secure non-public section of the EU database under Article 49(4), point (d). For the systems referred to in Annex III, point 2, Article 49(5) requires registration at national level.
As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.
Relation recorded on: Article 60: testing in real world conditions outside a sandbox
Consequence
- ObligationArticle 60: testing in real world conditions outside a sandbox
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-60-real-world-testing

When this applies

1Applies throughout the entire duration of the testing in real world conditions, and on its completion, suspension or termination.

When this does not apply

The Regulation provides no exception to the duty to report a serious incident or to the inspection powers. The reporting route itself runs through Article 73, which governs the deadlines and the manner of reporting.

Referring to this object

Citation block

Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.

Reference

Praxikon, "Oversight during the test, incident reporting and recall procedure",
praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:article-60-oversight-and-incident-response@1.0.0,
dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0),
effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z,
sha256 2d0f4824005cd8bf8954ca788130a98e43e23a7466fef11bc5926012b07d9d63,
https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/control/article-60-oversight-and-incident-response
(https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Acontrol%3Aarticle-60-oversight-and-incident-response&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-23)

Short form

praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:article-60-oversight-and-incident-response@1.0.0 (sha256 2d0f4824)

BibTeX

@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-control-article-60-oversight-and-incident-response-1-0-0,
  author       = {{Praxikon}},
  title        = {Oversight during the test, incident reporting and recall procedure},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {1.0.0},
  number       = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:article-60-oversight-and-incident-response},
  howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
  note         = {effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 2d0f4824005cd8bf8954ca788130a98e43e23a7466fef11bc5926012b07d9d63},
  url          = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/control/article-60-oversight-and-incident-response},
  urldate      = {2026-08-23},
  language     = {en}
}

CSL JSON

[
  {
    "id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:article-60-oversight-and-incident-response@1.0.0",
    "type": "dataset",
    "title": "Oversight during the test, incident reporting and recall procedure",
    "container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
    "publisher": "Praxikon",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:article-60-oversight-and-incident-response",
    "URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/control/article-60-oversight-and-incident-response",
    "language": "en",
    "issued": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          8
        ]
      ]
    },
    "accessed": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          23
        ]
      ]
    },
    "note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 2d0f4824005cd8bf8954ca788130a98e43e23a7466fef11bc5926012b07d9d63; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Acontrol%3Aarticle-60-oversight-and-incident-response&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
  }
]

How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms

For agents and integrations

This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.

Open as JSON Open as JSON-LD Read the methodology