Skip to main content
Praxikon
Back to the explorer
Actorv1.0.0

Provider of an AI system

A party that develops or has an AI system developed and places it on the market under its own name.

The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map

Address and citation

This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.

Identifier
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider
Payload hash (sha256)
d616e5233519c6adf01f00c1f5a3c8f16d7d861ad75579fefad24cd8ebbc2f81

Citation line

Praxikon, "Provider of an AI system", praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.2.0 (schema 1.5.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-09-06T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 d616e5233519c6adf01f00c1f5a3c8f16d7d861ad75579fefad24cd8ebbc2f81
Version
1.0.0
Legal time (effective_at)
1 August 2024
Knowledge time (known_at)
8 August 2026
Closed on
Not closed
Topics
governance

Review status: Editorially reviewed (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.

What this object links to

Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.

On this time pin this object has no relations that resolve.

What points at this object

Duties resting on this role

12 of 33 shown

The duty rests on this role. A supervisory authority addresses this role when it is not met.

  1. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Annex III, points 1 to 8

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 7(1) and (3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | any ofApplies where the intended purpose of the AI system falls within one of the eight areas listed in Annex III: biometrics, critical infrastructure, education and vocational training, employment and workers management, access to essential private and public services, law enforcement, migration and border control management, or administration of justice and democratic processes.
    • Condition | allClassification follows Article 6(2). For points 1, 6 and 7 the text adds the condition that the use is permitted under relevant Union or national law. We read that condition as meaning that a prohibition under Article 5 comes before the question whether the system is high-risk; that is our reading and not the literal text, which states the condition without naming the order.
    • Condition | any ofThe duty rests on the provider, but the role can shift. Under Article 25(1) a distributor, importer, deployer or third party becomes a provider itself where it puts its name or trademark on the system, makes a substantial modification, or changes the intended purpose such that the system becomes high-risk under Article 6. From that moment it carries the mapping to a point of Annex III itself.
    • ExceptionArticle 6(3) takes a system listed in Annex III back outside high-risk where it does not pose a significant risk of harm to health, safety or fundamental rights, including by not materially influencing the outcome of decision making, and one of four conditions is met: the system performs a narrow procedural task, it improves the result of a previously completed human activity, it detects decision making patterns or deviations from prior patterns without replacing or influencing the previously completed human assessment without proper human review, or it performs a preparatory task to an assessment relevant for the purposes of the use cases listed in Annex III. A system that performs profiling of natural persons is always high-risk.
    • ExceptionThe derogation is not free. Article 6(4) requires a provider who considers that a system referred to in Annex III is not high-risk to document its assessment before the system is placed on the market or put into service, subjects that provider to the registration obligation in Article 49(2), and requires it to provide the documentation to national competent authorities on request.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Annex III: the eight areas separately

    Consequence

  2. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113, Article 6(2) and Annex III application date

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe intended purpose falls within a use case listed in Annex III.
    • Condition | allClassification follows Article 6(2).
    • ExceptionA listed Annex III system may fall outside high-risk under the strict conditions in Article 6(3), except where it profiles. The assessment and registration must be documented.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Annex III: high-risk AI

    Consequence

  3. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 10(1)-(6)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe high-risk system is trained with data; the provider composes the datasets, the deployer controls relevant input data.
    • ExceptionFor special categories of personal data the strict exception of Article 10(5) applies (bias detection and correction under conditions).

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 10: data and data governance

    Consequence

  4. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 11(1)-(3) and Annex IV

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe provider places a high-risk AI system on the market or puts it into service.
    • ExceptionSmall providers (SMEs) may provide the documentation in the simplified form established by the Commission.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 11: technical documentation

    Consequence

  5. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 111(2)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: New Article 111(4)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Recital 39 of Regulation (EU) 2026/1744

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe transitional rule is without prejudice to the application of Article 5, as referred to in Article 113, third paragraph, point (a). A prohibited practice remains prohibited, regardless of when the system was placed on the market or put into service and regardless of whether the design has changed.
    • Condition | allThe transitional rule concerns the high-risk requirements of Chapter III and is not an exemption from the whole Regulation. Article 4 has applied since 2 February 2025 irrespective of when a system reached the market, and Article 50 has applied to all systems in scope since 2 August 2026. The paragraph 4 added by the Digital Omnibus confirms this: it gives legacy generative systems a short extra period for Article 50(2), which would make no sense if Article 50 did not reach them.
    • Condition | allApplies to operators of high-risk AI systems placed on the market or put into service before the date of application of Chapter III referred to in Article 113, other than the systems referred to in paragraph 1 that are components of the large-scale IT systems listed in Annex X. That date is 2 December 2027 for systems that are high-risk under Article 6(2) and Annex III, and 2 August 2028 for systems that are high-risk under Article 6(1) and Annex I. For that group the high-risk requirements bite only once the systems are subject to significant changes in their designs as from that date.
    • Condition | allThe grace period runs per type and model, not per unit. If at least one individual unit of the type and model was lawfully placed on the market or put into service before the cut off date, other units of the same type and model are covered too and may be offered without additional obligations, requirements or additional certification, as long as the design remains unchanged. The decisive date is the one on which the first unit of that type and model was placed on the market or put into service in the Union.
    • Condition | allApplies independently to providers and deployers of high-risk AI systems intended to be used by public authorities. They must in any case take the necessary steps to comply with the requirements and obligations of the Regulation by 2 August 2030, even where the design remains unchanged.
    • ExceptionSystems that are components of the large-scale IT systems established by the legal acts listed in Annex X fall not under paragraph 2 but under paragraph 1. Paragraph 1 was not amended by the Digital Omnibus and keeps its own cut off: placed on the market or put into service before 2 August 2027, with compliance by 31 December 2030.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 111(2): legacy high-risk systems and the 2 August 2030 date

    Consequence

  6. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 12, Article 19 and Article 26(6)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe system is high-risk; the provider designs the logging, provider and deployer retain the logs under their control.
    • ExceptionThe retention period may be limited by Union or national law, including data protection.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 12: logging and traceability

    Consequence

  7. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 13(1)-(3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe provider supplies a high-risk system; the deployer uses it according to the instructions.
    • ExceptionThe level of detail may match the intended deployer’s knowledge; trade secrets need not be disclosed.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 13: transparency towards deployers

    Consequence

  8. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 14(1)-(5)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe system is high-risk; the provider builds in oversight measures, the deployer assigns oversight to competent persons.
    • ExceptionFor remote biometric identification the reinforced requirement of verification by at least two authorised persons applies (Article 14(5)), with the exceptions listed there.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 14: human oversight

    Consequence

  9. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 15(1)-(5)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe provider places a high-risk AI system on the market or puts it into service.
    • ExceptionSystems that continue learning after deployment carry additional requirements to control feedback loops and drift.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 15: accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity

    Consequence

  10. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 16(a)-(l)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allApplies to providers of high-risk AI systems. For the standalone Annex III route (Article 6(2)) the date is 2 December 2027. For systems embedded as a safety component in products covered by the Annex I harmonisation legislation (Article 6(1)) the date is 2 August 2028.
    • ExceptionA provider that considers an Annex III system not to be high-risk must document that assessment before placing it on the market and remains subject to the registration obligation of Article 49(2) (Article 6(4)). Where an AI system referred to in Annex III performs profiling of natural persons it is always considered high-risk (Article 6(3), final subparagraph).

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 16: the twelve duties of a provider of a high-risk AI system

    Consequence

  11. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 17(1)-(3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe provider places high-risk AI systems on the market or puts them into service.
    • ExceptionProviders already under sectoral quality regimes may integrate the AI elements into that existing system; SMEs may implement elements in simplified form.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 17: quality management system

    Consequence

  12. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 18(1)-(3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allApplies to the provider of a high-risk AI system. The period ends ten years after the system has been placed on the market or put into service.
    • Condition | allWhere the provider is a financial institution subject to requirements regarding internal governance, arrangements or processes under Union financial services law, it maintains the technical documentation of point (a) as part of the documentation it already keeps under that law. That is not an exemption from the retention duty but an indication of the regime in which it is carried out for that one component. Paragraph 3 does not mention points (b) to (e).

    Relation recorded on: Article 18: documentation keeping

    Consequence

Open the full list in the explorer

The list there can be slightly wider than this group: the filter also counts the object itself, and for a role the broader role above it.

What affects this role without the duty resting on it

11 of 11 shown

This role is practically affected without being the addressee: it receives the information, has to cooperate, or absorbs the consequences in its own process.

  1. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 28(1), (3) and (5); Article 29(1) and (2); Article 30(1), (2) and (4)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Article 1, points (14) to (16), amending Articles 28, 29 and 30

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 31(1), (4), (5), (6), (8) and (11)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 32; Article 33(1) to (4)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 34(1) to (3); Article 35(1) and (2)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 36(3), (5), (6) and (9)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 37(1), (2) and (4); Article 38(1) to (3); Article 39

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allPractically engaged as soon as a notified body comes into the picture for your system. Within Annex III that is, under Article 43(1), only for the biometrics of point 1, and then only along the Annex VII procedure. Within Annex I, Section A, it happens through the sectoral conformity assessment of Article 43(3). For the systems of points 2 to 8 of Annex III, which follow the internal control of Annex VI, no notified body is involved and this Section has no direct bearing on you. The Section itself has applied since 2 August 2025 and therefore well before the underlying high-risk obligations bite: the notification chain has to exist before there is anything to assess.
    • Condition | allArticle 33(3) makes the agreement of the provider a condition for subcontracting: activities may be subcontracted or carried out by a subsidiary only with the agreement of the provider. That is a right you can exercise only if you ask about it, because the provision does not prescribe any active notice to you.
    • ExceptionArticle 39 rules out a free choice of a foreign body. Only conformity assessment bodies established under the law of a third country with which the Union has concluded an agreement may be authorised to carry out the activities of notified bodies, and then only where they meet the requirements laid down in Article 31 or ensure an equivalent level of compliance.
    • ExceptionThe presumption in Article 32 is narrow. A conformity assessment body is presumed to comply with the requirements of Article 31 in so far as the applicable harmonised standards cover those requirements and their references have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Without that publication the presumption does not operate, and it never reaches further than what the standard covers.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Articles 28 to 39: notifying authorities and notified bodies

    Consequence

  2. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 44(1)-(3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 43(1), (2) and (4)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Article 1, point (19), replacing Article 43(3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Article 1, point (2)(a), replacing Article 2(2), and point (41), amending Annex I

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 36(3), (5), (7), (8) and (9)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 45(2), point (b)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Article 1, point (40)(b), replacing Article 113, third paragraph, point (c)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Chapter III, Section 5, and Article 113, second paragraph

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allApplies as soon as a notified body has issued a certificate for a high-risk AI system. That happens along two routes. The certificate under Annex VII, which under Article 43(1) and (2) arises within Annex III only for the biometrics of point 1. There it can arise along two ways: a provider who has applied harmonised standards or common specifications may under the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 choose between the internal control of Annex VI and the procedure involving a notified body of Annex VII, and the second subparagraph makes Annex VII mandatory in the four cases it lists. And the certificate issued under Article 43(3) as replaced with effect from 27 July 2026, within the sectoral conformity assessment of the products of Annex I, Section A, where the body is notified under that sectoral legislation, where the quality management system of Article 17 is assessed as well, and where point 3, points 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5, the fifth paragraph of point 4.6 and point 5 of Annex VII apply. For the products of Annex I, Section B, which cover machinery since 27 July 2026, this Article has no bearing: the amended Article 2(2) makes only Article 6(1), Article 60a and Articles 102 to 112 applicable to those systems, and Article 44 is not in that list. Nor does it bear on the systems of points 2 to 8 of Annex III, which under Article 43(2) follow the internal control of Annex VI, where no notified body is involved.
    • ExceptionParagraph 3 withholds suspension, withdrawal or restriction where compliance with the requirements of Section 2 is ensured by appropriate corrective action taken by the provider of the system within an appropriate deadline set by the notified body. The principle of proportionality also allows the body to confine itself to restrictions instead of withdrawal.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 44: certificates of notified bodies

    Consequence

  3. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 46(1)-(2)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 46(3)-(4)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 46(5)-(7)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | any ofThe authorisation may be granted only for exceptional reasons of public security or the protection of life and health of persons, environmental protection or the protection of key industrial and infrastructural assets. That list is the entire basis: a commercial interest, a delivery deadline or a tender date is not in it.
    • Condition | allA duly justified request is required, the authorisation comes from a market surveillance authority, it concerns specific high-risk AI systems, and it operates solely within the territory of the Member State concerned. It is moreover for a limited period while the necessary conformity assessment procedures are being carried out, and the completion of those procedures shall be undertaken without undue delay.
    • Condition | allThe authorisation is issued only if the market surveillance authority concludes that the high-risk AI system complies with the requirements of Section 2. The derogation therefore concerns the procedure of Article 43 and not the substantive requirements of Articles 8 to 15: those must be met before the authorisation exists.
    • ExceptionParagraph 2 removes the prior authorisation in a duly justified situation of urgency for exceptional reasons of public security or in the case of a specific, substantial and imminent threat to the life or physical safety of natural persons. Only law-enforcement authorities and civil protection authorities may rely on it, and only for putting into service, provided that such authorisation is requested during or after the use without undue delay.
    • ExceptionParagraph 7 excludes this Article for high-risk AI systems related to products covered by Union harmonisation legislation listed in Section A of Annex I. There, only the derogations from the conformity assessment established in that Union harmonisation legislation shall apply. For a regulated product, Article 46 is therefore not a route.
    • ExceptionThe notification duty in paragraph 3 towards the Commission and the other Member States shall not cover sensitive operational data in relation to the activities of law-enforcement authorities. The authorisation itself stands; the flow of data around it is limited.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 46: derogation from conformity assessment procedure

    Consequence

  4. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 56(1)-(9)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Article 1, point (21), replacing Article 56(6)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | any ofArises for the provider of a general-purpose AI model: it may be invited under paragraph 3 to participate in the drawing up of a code of practice, and under paragraph 7 to adhere to a code of practice.
    • Condition | any ofArises for other stakeholders: paragraph 3 names civil society organisations, industry, academia and other relevant stakeholders, such as downstream providers and independent experts, that may support the process.
    • ExceptionParagraph 7 provides that for providers of general-purpose AI models not presenting systemic risks this adherence may be limited to the obligations provided for in Article 53, unless they declare explicitly their interest to join the full code. A provider without a systemic-risk model therefore does not have to sign up to the systemic-risk part in order to rely on the code.
    • ExceptionArticle 56 does not impose a separate obligation on the provider. Paragraphs 3 and 7 speak of inviting, not of requiring, and the obligations themselves remain those of Articles 53 and 55. Not signing is therefore not an infringement of Article 56.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 56: codes of practice for general-purpose AI models

    Consequence

  5. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 57(1)-(17), Article 58, Article 113; as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allRelevant where you are a provider or prospective provider of an innovative AI system that you want to develop, train, test or validate before placing it on the market or putting it into service, and you want up-front certainty about classification or about how you meet the requirements of this Regulation.
    • ExceptionParticipation is voluntary. Article 57 places the duty on the Member State to provide a sandbox, not on you to join one. A Member State may also fulfil that duty by participating in an existing sandbox with equivalent national coverage. Article 57(4) leaves other regulatory sandboxes established under Union or national law unaffected.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 57: AI regulatory sandboxes

    Consequence

  6. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 62(1) to (3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe priority access in paragraph 1, point (a), applies to SMEs, including start-ups, having a registered office or a branch in the Union, and only to the extent that they fulfil the eligibility conditions and selection criteria. The reduction of fees in paragraph 2 attaches to conformity assessments under Article 43 and to the capacity of an SME provider, including start-ups. Article 62 sits in Chapter VI, which is named in none of the three exceptions in the third paragraph of Article 113; the general date of application in the second paragraph therefore governs, 2 August 2026.
    • ExceptionParagraph 1, point (a), expressly states that the priority access shall not preclude other SMEs, including start-ups, other than those referred to in that paragraph from access to the AI regulatory sandbox, provided that they also fulfil the eligibility conditions and selection criteria. Priority is therefore an order of precedence and not an exclusive right, and it releases nobody from the eligibility conditions and selection criteria.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 62: measures for providers and deployers that are SMEs or start-ups

    Consequence

  7. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 63(1) and (2)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 17(1); Article 62(2); Article 113, second paragraph

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allTwo cumulative conditions. The organisation is an SME, including a start-up, within the meaning of Recommendation 2003/361/EC, and it does not have partner enterprises or linked enterprises within the meaning of that Recommendation. A standalone small enterprise that is not a microenterprise is therefore covered since 27 July 2026. The thresholds and the notions of partner enterprise and linked enterprise sit in that Recommendation and not in this Regulation; anyone relying on this article tests against that text. The benefit touches only the quality management system required by Article 17, and only those elements of it that the Commission designates in its guidelines. Article 63 sits in Chapter VI, which is named in none of the three exceptions in the third paragraph of Article 113; the general date of application in the second paragraph therefore governs, 2 August 2026.
    • ExceptionParagraph 2 expressly provides that paragraph 1 shall not be interpreted as exempting those operators from fulfilling any other requirements or obligations laid down in this Regulation, including those established in Articles 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 72 and 73. The risk management system, data and data governance, technical documentation, record-keeping, transparency, human oversight, accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity, post-market monitoring and the reporting of serious incidents therefore continue to apply in full.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 63: derogations for SMEs in the quality management system

    Consequence

  8. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 78(1)-(5)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allApplies to all information and data obtained by the Commission, the market surveillance authorities, the notified bodies and any other natural or legal person involved in the application of this Regulation in carrying out their tasks and activities. The protection operates in accordance with Union or national law and not on its own.
    • Condition | allParagraph 2 limits what an authority may request: only data that is strictly necessary for the assessment of the risk posed by AI systems and for the exercise of its powers in accordance with this Regulation and with Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. Two follow-on duties attach to that: adequate and effective cybersecurity measures, and deletion as soon as the data is no longer needed for the purpose for which it was obtained.
    • ExceptionThe protection of intellectual property, confidential business information and trade secrets, including source code, applies except in the cases referred to in Article 5 of Directive (EU) 2016/943. Point (a) of paragraph 1 says so in as many words.
    • ExceptionParagraph 4 provides that paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 do not affect the rights or obligations of the Commission, the Member States and their relevant authorities, or those of notified bodies, with regard to the exchange of information and the dissemination of warnings, including in the context of cross-border cooperation, nor the obligations of the parties concerned to provide information under criminal law of the Member States. Confidentiality under this article is therefore not a duty of silence between authorities.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 78: confidentiality of what you submit to an authority

    Consequence

  9. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 87

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe trigger is a report of an infringement of this Regulation, whatever the risk class of the system: a report about an AI system outside the high-risk category is covered just as much. The protection itself is not unconditional. It comes from Directive (EU) 2019/1937, which in Article 4 requires the person reporting to have obtained the information in a work-related context, and in Article 6(1)(a) requires reasonable grounds to believe that what was reported was true and fell within the scope of that Directive.
    • ExceptionArticle 87 creates no channel requirement. That requirement comes from Article 8 of Directive (EU) 2019/1937. Paragraph 1 places it on legal entities in the private and the public sector; paragraph 3 limits paragraph 1 in the private sector to entities with 50 or more workers. That threshold is not general, however. Paragraph 4 provides that the threshold in paragraph 3 shall not apply to entities falling within the scope of the Union acts referred to in Parts I.B and II of the Annex to that Directive, which cover financial services, anti-money laundering and transport safety among others. Paragraph 7 allows a Member State, following a risk assessment, to require entities with fewer than 50 workers as well. Paragraph 9 applies paragraph 1 to all legal entities in the public sector, with the option for a Member State to exempt municipalities under 10 000 inhabitants and other small public entities. Below fifty workers there is therefore not simply no channel requirement: it depends on the sector you fall in and on what your Member State has decided. The right to report and the protection of the person reporting exist in any event, through the external route of Article 10 of that Directive.
    • ExceptionThe material scope of Directive (EU) 2019/1937 runs through Article 2(1)(a), which refers to the Union acts listed in the Annex to that Directive. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 was not added to that Annex: it makes the Directive applicable directly, in Article 87. National transposition law that ties its own scope to that same Annex, such as the Dutch Wet bescherming klokkenluiders, may therefore lag behind the Regulation. Whether a report about an AI system falls under national law as a result is not settled.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 87: reporting of infringements and protection of reporting persons

    Consequence

  10. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 95(1) to (4)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allParagraph 1 expressly concerns AI systems other than high-risk AI systems, and the voluntary application to them of some or all of the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2. Paragraph 2 is wider and concerns the voluntary application, including by deployers, of specific requirements to all AI systems, on the basis of clear objectives and key performance indicators to measure the achievement of those objectives. Article 95 sits in Chapter X, which is named in none of the three exceptions in the third paragraph of Article 113; the general date of application in the second paragraph therefore governs, 2 August 2026.
    • Condition | any ofParagraph 3 sets out who may draw up a code of conduct: individual providers or deployers of AI systems, organisations representing them, or both, including with the involvement of any interested stakeholders and their representative organisations, including civil society organisations and academia. A code may cover one or more AI systems, taking into account the similarity of the intended purpose of the relevant systems.
    • ExceptionArticle 95 contains no provision that sets aside, suspends or replaces an obligation under this Regulation. The word voluntary refers to the application of requirements that precisely do not apply to the system concerned, and not to the requirements that do apply. A code of conduct on AI literacy leaves Article 4 untouched, and a code of conduct on transparency leaves Article 50 untouched.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 95: codes of conduct for voluntary application of specific requirements

    Consequence

  11. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 99(1)-(11)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (38)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 113, third paragraph, point (b)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (40)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 101(1)-(6)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 100(1)-(3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (32)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allRelevant as soon as you are an operator within the meaning of the Regulation, that is a provider, product manufacturer, deployer, authorised representative, importer or distributor, and one of the provisions named in Article 99(3), (4) or (5) is engaged. The Article 101 regime is additionally relevant where you are a provider of a general-purpose AI model, because there the Commission fines you itself. If you fall within the competence of the AI Office under Article 75(1), Article 75c is added on top.
    • ExceptionParagraph 6 reverses the calculation for SMEs, including start-ups: for them the lower of the percentage and the amount applies, where for other undertakings it is the higher of the two, and it does so for every fine referred to in Article 99. The inserted paragraph 6a does the same for small mid-cap enterprises, but expressly only for paragraphs 4 and 5, so the Article 5 band is not reversed for them. Paragraph 8 leaves it to each Member State to determine to what extent administrative fines may be imposed on public authorities and bodies established in that Member State, so the ceiling for a public organisation does not follow from the Regulation. Paragraph 9 allows the fine to be imposed by the competent national courts or by other bodies rather than by the authority in some Member States.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 99, 100 and 101: the penalty structure per obligation

    Consequence

Evidence this role owns

12 of 31 shown

This duty holder creates, maintains and can produce the evidence.

  1. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Annex III, points 1 to 8

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 7(1) and (3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | any ofApplies where the intended purpose of the AI system falls within one of the eight areas listed in Annex III: biometrics, critical infrastructure, education and vocational training, employment and workers management, access to essential private and public services, law enforcement, migration and border control management, or administration of justice and democratic processes.
    • Condition | allClassification follows Article 6(2). For points 1, 6 and 7 the text adds the condition that the use is permitted under relevant Union or national law. We read that condition as meaning that a prohibition under Article 5 comes before the question whether the system is high-risk; that is our reading and not the literal text, which states the condition without naming the order.
    • Condition | any ofThe duty rests on the provider, but the role can shift. Under Article 25(1) a distributor, importer, deployer or third party becomes a provider itself where it puts its name or trademark on the system, makes a substantial modification, or changes the intended purpose such that the system becomes high-risk under Article 6. From that moment it carries the mapping to a point of Annex III itself.
    • ExceptionArticle 6(3) takes a system listed in Annex III back outside high-risk where it does not pose a significant risk of harm to health, safety or fundamental rights, including by not materially influencing the outcome of decision making, and one of four conditions is met: the system performs a narrow procedural task, it improves the result of a previously completed human activity, it detects decision making patterns or deviations from prior patterns without replacing or influencing the previously completed human assessment without proper human review, or it performs a preparatory task to an assessment relevant for the purposes of the use cases listed in Annex III. A system that performs profiling of natural persons is always high-risk.
    • ExceptionThe derogation is not free. Article 6(4) requires a provider who considers that a system referred to in Annex III is not high-risk to document its assessment before the system is placed on the market or put into service, subjects that provider to the registration obligation in Article 49(2), and requires it to provide the documentation to national competent authorities on request.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Annex III: the eight areas separately

    Consequence

  2. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113, Article 6(2) and Annex III application date

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe intended purpose falls within a use case listed in Annex III.
    • Condition | allClassification follows Article 6(2).
    • ExceptionA listed Annex III system may fall outside high-risk under the strict conditions in Article 6(3), except where it profiles. The assessment and registration must be documented.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Annex III: high-risk AI

    Consequence

  3. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 10(1)-(6)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe high-risk system is trained with data; the provider composes the datasets, the deployer controls relevant input data.
    • ExceptionFor special categories of personal data the strict exception of Article 10(5) applies (bias detection and correction under conditions).

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 10: data and data governance

    Consequence

  4. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 11(1)-(3) and Annex IV

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe provider places a high-risk AI system on the market or puts it into service.
    • ExceptionSmall providers (SMEs) may provide the documentation in the simplified form established by the Commission.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 11: technical documentation

    Consequence

  5. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 111(2)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: New Article 111(4)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Recital 39 of Regulation (EU) 2026/1744

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe transitional rule is without prejudice to the application of Article 5, as referred to in Article 113, third paragraph, point (a). A prohibited practice remains prohibited, regardless of when the system was placed on the market or put into service and regardless of whether the design has changed.
    • Condition | allThe transitional rule concerns the high-risk requirements of Chapter III and is not an exemption from the whole Regulation. Article 4 has applied since 2 February 2025 irrespective of when a system reached the market, and Article 50 has applied to all systems in scope since 2 August 2026. The paragraph 4 added by the Digital Omnibus confirms this: it gives legacy generative systems a short extra period for Article 50(2), which would make no sense if Article 50 did not reach them.
    • Condition | allApplies to operators of high-risk AI systems placed on the market or put into service before the date of application of Chapter III referred to in Article 113, other than the systems referred to in paragraph 1 that are components of the large-scale IT systems listed in Annex X. That date is 2 December 2027 for systems that are high-risk under Article 6(2) and Annex III, and 2 August 2028 for systems that are high-risk under Article 6(1) and Annex I. For that group the high-risk requirements bite only once the systems are subject to significant changes in their designs as from that date.
    • Condition | allThe grace period runs per type and model, not per unit. If at least one individual unit of the type and model was lawfully placed on the market or put into service before the cut off date, other units of the same type and model are covered too and may be offered without additional obligations, requirements or additional certification, as long as the design remains unchanged. The decisive date is the one on which the first unit of that type and model was placed on the market or put into service in the Union.
    • Condition | allApplies independently to providers and deployers of high-risk AI systems intended to be used by public authorities. They must in any case take the necessary steps to comply with the requirements and obligations of the Regulation by 2 August 2030, even where the design remains unchanged.
    • ExceptionSystems that are components of the large-scale IT systems established by the legal acts listed in Annex X fall not under paragraph 2 but under paragraph 1. Paragraph 1 was not amended by the Digital Omnibus and keeps its own cut off: placed on the market or put into service before 2 August 2027, with compliance by 31 December 2030.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 111(2): legacy high-risk systems and the 2 August 2030 date

    Consequence

  6. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 12, Article 19 and Article 26(6)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe system is high-risk; the provider designs the logging, provider and deployer retain the logs under their control.
    • ExceptionThe retention period may be limited by Union or national law, including data protection.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 12: logging and traceability

    Consequence

  7. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 14(1)-(5)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe system is high-risk; the provider builds in oversight measures, the deployer assigns oversight to competent persons.
    • ExceptionFor remote biometric identification the reinforced requirement of verification by at least two authorised persons applies (Article 14(5)), with the exceptions listed there.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 14: human oversight

    Consequence

  8. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 15(1)-(5)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe provider places a high-risk AI system on the market or puts it into service.
    • ExceptionSystems that continue learning after deployment carry additional requirements to control feedback loops and drift.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 15: accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity

    Consequence

  9. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 16(a)-(l)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allApplies to providers of high-risk AI systems. For the standalone Annex III route (Article 6(2)) the date is 2 December 2027. For systems embedded as a safety component in products covered by the Annex I harmonisation legislation (Article 6(1)) the date is 2 August 2028.
    • ExceptionA provider that considers an Annex III system not to be high-risk must document that assessment before placing it on the market and remains subject to the registration obligation of Article 49(2) (Article 6(4)). Where an AI system referred to in Annex III performs profiling of natural persons it is always considered high-risk (Article 6(3), final subparagraph).

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 16: the twelve duties of a provider of a high-risk AI system

    Consequence

  10. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 17(1)-(3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe provider places high-risk AI systems on the market or puts them into service.
    • ExceptionProviders already under sectoral quality regimes may integrate the AI elements into that existing system; SMEs may implement elements in simplified form.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 17: quality management system

    Consequence

  11. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 18(1)-(3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allApplies to the provider of a high-risk AI system. The period ends ten years after the system has been placed on the market or put into service.
    • Condition | allWhere the provider is a financial institution subject to requirements regarding internal governance, arrangements or processes under Union financial services law, it maintains the technical documentation of point (a) as part of the documentation it already keeps under that law. That is not an exemption from the retention duty but an indication of the regime in which it is carried out for that one component. Paragraph 3 does not mention points (b) to (e).

    Relation recorded on: Article 18: documentation keeping

    Consequence

  12. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 20(1)-(2)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Article 1, point (40)(b), of Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, replacing Article 113, third paragraph, point (c), of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allApplies to providers of high-risk AI systems as soon as they consider, or have reason to consider, that a system they have placed on the market or put into service is not in conformity with this Regulation. For the standalone Annex III route (Article 6(2)) the date is 2 December 2027. For systems embedded as a safety component in products covered by the Annex I harmonisation legislation (Article 6(1)) the date is 2 August 2028.
    • Condition | any ofThe second layer in paragraph 2 is added only where the system presents a risk within the meaning of Article 79(1) and the provider becomes aware of that risk. The investigation of causes and the duty to inform the market surveillance authorities and, where applicable, the notified body that issued a certificate under Article 44, then come on top of the corrective actions under paragraph 1.
    • Condition | any ofThe distributor, the importer and the deployer appear here as affected parties, but that is not their only possible position. Anyone who puts their name or trade mark on a high-risk system already placed on the market, who substantially modifies such a system, or who changes the intended purpose of a system not classified as high-risk so that it becomes high-risk, is considered a provider under Article 25(1) and is subject to the obligations of Article 16. Point (j) of that Article routes straight to Article 20, so this provision then becomes a duty of their own rather than a notification arriving from someone else. In the trade mark case this applies without prejudice to contractual arrangements allocating the obligations otherwise.
    • ExceptionArticle 20 is by definition about systems already placed on the market or put into service, and that is exactly the group covered by the transitional rule of Article 111(2). That provision was replaced by Article 1, point (39)(a), of Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 and now reads: without prejudice to the application of Article 5 as referred to in Article 113, third paragraph, point (a), this Regulation applies to operators of high-risk AI systems, other than the systems referred to in paragraph 1 of that Article, that have been placed on the market or put into service before the date of application of Chapter III referred to in Article 113, only if, as from that date, those systems are subject to significant changes in their designs. The cut-off is therefore no longer a fixed date in paragraph 2: the date of 2 August 2026 that stood there until that amendment has been removed, and the amended paragraph names no date of its own. The carve-out in paragraph 1 covers systems that are components of the large-scale IT systems listed in Annex X; paragraph 1 was not amended and keeps a cut-off of its own. For systems intended to be used by public authorities the reprieve in paragraph 2 does not hold: there, compliance with the requirements and obligations is due by 2 August 2030 in any event. Which date of application of Chapter III is the cut-off is an open point: the object on Article 111 reads it as route dependent, so 2 December 2027 for the Annex III route and 2 August 2028 for the Annex I route, and marks that reading expressly as preliminary. That question is carried there, not here.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 20: corrective actions and duty of information

    Consequence

Objects that are about this role

12 of 408 shown

The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.

  1. Source

    This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113, Article 6(2) and Annex III application date

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe intended purpose of the system falls within a use case listed in Annex III.
    • ExceptionNotwithstanding the first subparagraph of Article 6(3), an AI system referred to in Annex III shall always be considered high-risk where it performs profiling of natural persons.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Justify the Article 6(3) exception against each individual condition

    Consequence

  2. Source

    This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113, Article 6(2) and Annex III application date

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    No condition or exception recorded on this object.

    Relation recorded on: Classify the use case and document the outcome

    Consequence

  3. Source

    This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113, Article 6(2) and Annex III application date

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allYou are considering relying on Article 6(3) for a system falling under Annex III.

    Relation recorded on: Run the profiling test before invoking the Article 6(3) exception

    Consequence

  4. Source

    This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 10(1)-(6)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    No condition or exception recorded on this object.

    Relation recorded on: Set up data governance per dataset

    Consequence

  5. Source

    This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 11(1)-(3) and Annex IV

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    No condition or exception recorded on this object.

    Relation recorded on: Build the technical file per Annex IV

    Consequence

  6. Source

    This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 12, Article 19 and Article 26(6)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    No condition or exception recorded on this object.

    Relation recorded on: Design logging into the system

    Consequence

  7. Source

    This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 13(1)-(3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    No condition or exception recorded on this object.

    Relation recorded on: Provide complete instructions for use

    Consequence

  8. Source

    This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 14(1)-(5)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    No condition or exception recorded on this object.

    Relation recorded on: Design and assign effective human oversight

    Consequence

  9. Source

    This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 15(1)-(5)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    No condition or exception recorded on this object.

    Relation recorded on: Set and test performance and security levels

    Consequence

  10. Source

    This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 17(1)-(3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    No condition or exception recorded on this object.

    Relation recorded on: Set up an AI quality management system

    Consequence

  11. Source

    This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amendment of Article 4; entry into force 27 July 2026

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    No condition or exception recorded on this object.

    Relation recorded on: Take role- and context-specific AI literacy measures

    Consequence

  12. Source

    This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Amendment of Article 4; entry into force 27 July 2026

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allYour organisation is a provider or deployer of at least one AI system within scope.
    • ExceptionArticle 4 prescribes no specific course format, exam or certificate and does not require a guaranteed individual level.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Determine per role which knowledge is needed to use the specific system responsibly

    Consequence

Open the full list in the explorer

The list there can be slightly wider than this group: the filter also counts the object itself, and for a role the broader role above it.

When this applies

No condition recorded on this object.

When this does not apply

No exception recorded on this object.

Referring to this object

Citation block

Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.

Reference

Praxikon, "Provider of an AI system",
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider@1.0.0,
dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.2.0 (schema 1.5.0),
effective_at 2024-08-01T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z,
sha256 d616e5233519c6adf01f00c1f5a3c8f16d7d861ad75579fefad24cd8ebbc2f81,
https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/actor/provider
(https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aactor%3Aprovider&effective_at=2024-08-01&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-09-15)

Short form

praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider@1.0.0 (sha256 d616e523)

BibTeX

@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-actor-provider-1-0-0,
  author       = {{Praxikon}},
  title        = {Provider of an AI system},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {1.0.0},
  number       = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider},
  howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.2.0, schema 1.5.0},
  note         = {effective_at 2024-08-01T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 d616e5233519c6adf01f00c1f5a3c8f16d7d861ad75579fefad24cd8ebbc2f81},
  url          = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/actor/provider},
  urldate      = {2026-09-15},
  language     = {en}
}

CSL JSON

[
  {
    "id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider@1.0.0",
    "type": "dataset",
    "title": "Provider of an AI system",
    "container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
    "publisher": "Praxikon",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider",
    "URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/actor/provider",
    "language": "en",
    "issued": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          8
        ]
      ]
    },
    "accessed": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          9,
          15
        ]
      ]
    },
    "note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.2.0; schema 1.5.0; effective_at 2024-08-01T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 d616e5233519c6adf01f00c1f5a3c8f16d7d861ad75579fefad24cd8ebbc2f81; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aactor%3Aprovider&effective_at=2024-08-01&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
  }
]

How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms

For agents and integrations

This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.

Open as JSONOpen as JSON-LDRead the methodology