Article 15: accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity
Appropriate levels of performance, robustness and security across the lifecycle of high-risk AI.
The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map
Address and citation
This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.
- Identifier
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-15-accuracy-robustness- Payload hash (sha256)
96fcf15ac99ca507169f462e66eaebb72ab06b66e3754b0cf69a69347ed4dc6d
Citation line
Praxikon, "Article 15: accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity", praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-15-accuracy-robustness@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 96fcf15ac99ca507169f462e66eaebb72ab06b66e3754b0cf69a69347ed4dc6d- Version
- 1.0.0
- Legal time (effective_at)
- 27 July 2026
- Knowledge time (known_at)
- 8 August 2026
- Closed on
- Not closed
- Application date
- 2 December 2027
- Topics
- high-risk-requirements
Review status: Placed against the official source (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.
Who must act and who is affected
On an obligation the addressee is recorded separately from the party that is merely affected. That difference decides who a supervisory authority addresses and who has work to do without the duty resting on them.
Duty holder
- Provider of an AI systempraxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider
Affected actor
Not recorded on this object.
Oversight
Not recorded on this object.
Evidence owner
- Provider of an AI systempraxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider
What this object links to
Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.
Who carries the duty
1 of 1 shown
The duty rests on this role. A supervisory authority addresses this role when it is not met.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 15(1)-(5)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
- Condition | allThe provider places a high-risk AI system on the market or puts it into service.
- ExceptionSystems that continue learning after deployment carry additional requirements to control feedback loops and drift.
As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.
Consequence
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider
Who owns the evidence
1 of 1 shown
This duty holder creates, maintains and can produce the evidence.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 15(1)-(5)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
- Condition | allThe provider places a high-risk AI system on the market or puts it into service.
- ExceptionSystems that continue learning after deployment carry additional requirements to control feedback loops and drift.
As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.
Consequence
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider
What has to be done
1 of 1 shown
This is what concretely has to be done under the obligation.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 15(1)-(5)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
- Condition | allThe provider places a high-risk AI system on the market or puts it into service.
- ExceptionSystems that continue learning after deployment carry additional requirements to control feedback loops and drift.
As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.
Consequence
ActionSet and test performance and security levels
praxikon:eu:ai-act:action:article-15-accuracy-robustness-act
What has to be recorded
1 of 1 shown
This is what has to be in the file to show that the action was carried out.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 15(1)-(5)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
- Condition | allThe provider places a high-risk AI system on the market or puts it into service.
- ExceptionSystems that continue learning after deployment carry additional requirements to control feedback loops and drift.
As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.
Consequence
EvidencePerformance and security file
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-15-accuracy-robustness-record
What keeps it in place
1 of 1 shown
This is what keeps compliance in place over time, periodic or event-driven.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 15(1)-(5)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
- Condition | allThe provider places a high-risk AI system on the market or puts it into service.
- ExceptionSystems that continue learning after deployment carry additional requirements to control feedback loops and drift.
As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.
Consequence
ControlPerformance monitoring in use
praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:article-15-accuracy-robustness-control
Public tools
1 of 1 shown
This is the public route a reader can actually use.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 15(1)-(5)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
- Condition | allThe provider places a high-risk AI system on the market or puts it into service.
- ExceptionSystems that continue learning after deployment carry additional requirements to control feedback loops and drift.
As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.
Consequence
TemplateFull text of Article 15
praxikon:eu:ai-act:template:article-15-accuracy-robustness-legal-text
What points at this object
Objects hanging off this obligation
6 of 6 shown
The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.
Source
This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 15(1)-(5)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Relation recorded on: Set and test performance and security levels
Consequence
ActionSet and test performance and security levels
praxikon:eu:ai-act:action:article-15-accuracy-robustness-act
Source
This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 15(1)-(5)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Relation recorded on: Performance monitoring in use
Consequence
ControlPerformance monitoring in use
praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:article-15-accuracy-robustness-control
Source
This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 15(1)-(5)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Relation recorded on: Performance and security file
Consequence
EvidencePerformance and security file
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-15-accuracy-robustness-record
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42: international standards for artificial intelligence
Locator: ISO/IEC TR 24029-1:2021 and ISO/IEC 24029-2:2023, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:iso-iec-jtc1-sc42
Open official sourceEU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 15
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official source
Via
- Condition | allParticularly relevant to high-risk systems based on neural networks.
Relation recorded on: ISO/IEC 24029 series: assessment of the robustness of neural networks
Consequence
StandardISO/IEC 24029 series: assessment of the robustness of neural networks
praxikon:eu:ai-act:standard:standard-iso-iec-24029-robustness-neural-networks
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
CEN-CENELEC JTC 21: European standards under standardisation request M/613
Locator: prEN 18229-2 (draft standard), CEN/CLC/JTC 21 under M/613
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:cen-cenelec-jtc21
Open official sourceEU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 15; Article 40
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Relation recorded on: prEN 18229-2: AI trustworthiness framework part 2, accuracy and robustness
Consequence
StandardprEN 18229-2: AI trustworthiness framework part 2, accuracy and robustness
praxikon:eu:ai-act:standard:standard-pren-18229-2-accuracy-robustness
Source
This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 15(1)-(5)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Consequence
TemplateFull text of Article 15
praxikon:eu:ai-act:template:article-15-accuracy-robustness-legal-text
What this object states
Official fact
Attributable to a named primary source, with a locator. Where they differ, the official source prevails.
Article 15 requires high-risk systems to achieve and maintain appropriate levels of accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity throughout the lifecycle, including resilience against errors and AI-specific attacks such as data poisoning and adversarial examples.
- Locator: Article 15(1)-(5)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689Open official source
For the Annex III route this requirement applies from 2 December 2027; for high-risk AI in regulated products (Annex I) from 2 August 2028.
- Locator: Amended Article 113 application datespraxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744Open official source
Our interpretation
Our own reading. It can change without the law changing, and it is not the position of a supervisory authority.
Accuracy here is not a marketing number but a declared, testable value stated in the instructions for use and held against you in production.
- Locator: Article 15(1)-(5)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689Open official source
Recommended step
A practical step we consider appropriate. Not an obligation following from the Regulation.
Ask suppliers now for declared accuracy levels and test reports, and set up production monitoring against those levels.
- Locator: Article 15(1)-(5)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689Open official source
When this applies
- 1The provider places a high-risk AI system on the market or puts it into service.
When this does not apply
- Systems that continue learning after deployment carry additional requirements to control feedback loops and drift.
Referring to this object
Citation block
Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.
Reference
Praxikon, "Article 15: accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity", praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-15-accuracy-robustness@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 96fcf15ac99ca507169f462e66eaebb72ab06b66e3754b0cf69a69347ed4dc6d, https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/obligation/article-15-accuracy-robustness (https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-15-accuracy-robustness&effective_at=2026-07-27&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-25)
Short form
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-15-accuracy-robustness@1.0.0 (sha256 96fcf15a)
BibTeX
@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-obligation-article-15-accuracy-robustness-1-0-0,
author = {{Praxikon}},
title = {Article 15: accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity},
year = {2026},
version = {1.0.0},
number = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-15-accuracy-robustness},
howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
note = {effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 96fcf15ac99ca507169f462e66eaebb72ab06b66e3754b0cf69a69347ed4dc6d},
url = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/obligation/article-15-accuracy-robustness},
urldate = {2026-08-25},
language = {en}
}CSL JSON
[
{
"id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-15-accuracy-robustness@1.0.0",
"type": "dataset",
"title": "Article 15: accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity",
"container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
"publisher": "Praxikon",
"version": "1.0.0",
"number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-15-accuracy-robustness",
"URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/obligation/article-15-accuracy-robustness",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
8
]
]
},
"accessed": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
25
]
]
},
"note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 96fcf15ac99ca507169f462e66eaebb72ab06b66e3754b0cf69a69347ed4dc6d; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-15-accuracy-robustness&effective_at=2026-07-27&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
}
]How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms
For agents and integrations
This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.