Article 50: Transparency obligations for providers and deployers of certain AI systems
Praxikon tracks Article 50 (Transparency obligations for providers and deployers of certain AI systems) under the EU AI Act, citing the source for every statement.
Article 50 applies since 2 August 2026 and is the transparency article for AI interaction, chatbots, deepfakes, emotion recognition and AI-generated content. For European providers and deployers, the practical issue is the right timing, placement and wording of disclosures and labels. Systems already on the market before 2 August 2026 have until 2 December 2026 for machine-readable marking.
Official text
Source: EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. Text reproduced verbatim.
Download AI Act (PDF) →Official guidance on this article
13- Guidelines on transparency obligations for providers and deployers of certain AI systems under Article 50 of the AI ActExplains when the notification obligation for direct AI interaction applies, who precisely is provider or deployer, and what exceptions exist such as content that has only been subject to standard processing.PublishedGuidelinesEuropean Commission20 Jul 2026
- Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated ContentProvides the Commission-recognised voluntary route to demonstrate that the marking and labelling obligations for AI-generated content have been fulfilledPublishedCode of practiceEuropean Commission / AI Office10 Jun 2026
- EU icons for labelling AI-generated contentProvides a standardised visual form for the disclosure required by paragraph 4, so that people can see at a glance that content has been artificially generated or manipulatedPublishedTemplateEuropean Commission / AI Office6 Aug 2026
- Transparency obligations under Article 50 of the AI Act - Questions and AnswersExplains which notification obligation applies to direct interaction with an AI system, what exceptions there are, and who bears the obligation: the provider or the deployer.PublishedQ&AEuropean Commission, DG CONNECT24 Jul 2026
- Questions and answers on the Code of Practice for General-Purpose AIClarifies the distinction between the transparency rules for general-purpose AI models and the transparency obligations for AI systemsPublishedQ&AEuropean Commission, DG CONNECT20 Jul 2026
- EDPB Work Programme 2026-2027 (announcing joint guidelines on the interplay between the AI Act and the GDPR)Is to clarify the relationship between transparency obligations under Article 50 and information obligations towards data subjects under the GDPR, which the Commission already points forward to in its Article 50 guidelines.AnnouncedGuidelinesEDPB (European Data Protection Board)11 Feb 2026
- Guidance on generative AI and the GDPRIs relevant alongside the transparency obligation for generated content, because the same generative application must both be marked and requires a GDPR legal basisPublishedGuidelinesDutch Data Protection Authority (AP)13 Jul 2026
- Transparency requirements for AI: what does this mean for you?Translates the four transparency obligations into recognisable everyday situations and explains that the information must be available at the latest at the time of first interaction.PublishedQ&ADutch Data Protection Authority (AP)31 Jul 2026
- AI transparency requirements apply from 2 August: AP advises signing the code of practiceLinks each of the four obligations to the correct paragraph: paragraph 1 for direct interaction with an AI system, paragraph 2 for machine-readable marking of generated output, paragraph 3 for emotion recognition and biometric categorisation, paragraph 4 for visible labelling of deepfakes.PublishedNational guidanceDutch Data Protection Authority (AP), Algorithm Coordination Directorate9 Jul 2026
- Supervision of AI takes shape: key role for the AP and the RDIAnnounces that the AP receives supervisory authority for transparency obligations, with chatbots and deepfakes as concrete examples.PublishedNational guidanceDutch Data Protection Authority (AP), Algorithm Coordination Directorate20 Apr 2026
- Work agenda for coordinating AI and algorithm supervision 2026Names transparency and explainability as a priority in the year when transparency obligations actually come into force.PublishedNational guidanceDutch Data Protection Authority (AP), Algorithm Coordination Directorate26 Mar 2026
- Report AI & Algorithms Netherlands (RAN) - March 2026Substantiates with measurement data that transparency and explainability are falling short in Dutch practice, precisely the area for which the AP receives supervisory authority.PublishedNational guidanceDutch Data Protection Authority (AP)5 Mar 2026
- Response of the President of the Administrative Jurisdiction Division to the draft AI Regulation Implementation ActAdvises extending its own supervision to AI systems that the Division uses and that fall only under the transparency obligations of Chapter IV, without being high-risk.PublishedOpinionCouncil of State, Administrative Jurisdiction Division8 Jul 2026
What does this mean for you?
Provider+
Deployer+
SME / Startup+
Public Sector+
Compliance checklist
- AI interaction is clearly communicated
- AI-generated content is labelled
- Deepfakes are marked as artificial
- Emotion recognition is disclosed to affected persons
Want to save your progress? Create an account
Related recitals
Certain AI systems intended to interact with natural persons or to generate content may pose specific risks of impersonation or deception irrespective of whether they qualify as high-risk or not. In c…
A variety of AI systems can generate large quantities of synthetic content that becomes increasingly hard for humans to distinguish from human-generated and authentic content. The wide availability an…
Related tools
Related enforcement
Related blog posts
- →AI Act compliance: chatbots, voicebots & sentiment
- →AI content labeling rules: Article 50 AI Act, 2026
- →European Parliament votes on AI Act Omnibus: delays for high-risk AI and ban on nudifier apps
- →AI content transparency: EU code of practice
- →ChatGPT/Claude at work: EU AI Act obligations
- →Article 50 EU AI Act: provider vs deployer guide
Cross-references
Frequently asked questions
What transparency obligations apply to AI?+
Do I need to disclose that my chatbot is AI?+
What documentation does Article 50 of the AI Act require?+
Do I need to label deepfakes under the AI Act?+
When do the transparency obligations of Article 50 take effect?+
Do I need to tell users they are talking to a chatbot?+
Does the labelling obligation also apply to AI-generated text on news websites?+
What Article 50 requires in practice
Connections
What connects to Article 50 AI Act
Themes where this returns
The counterpart in the other law
- Article 4 GDPR: Definitions
- Article 9 GDPR: Processing of special categories of personal data
- Article 12 GDPR: Transparent information, communication and modalities for the exercise of the rights of the data subject
- Article 13 GDPR: Information to be provided where personal data are collected from the data subject
- Article 14 GDPR: Information to be provided where personal data have not been obtained from the data subject
GDPR interpretation that also applies here6 of 15
- EDPS v SRB: pseudonymised data are not always personal data for everyone, but the information duty applies from collection
2025-09-04 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Eerste kamer), Europese Toezichthouder voor gegevensbescherming (EDPS) tegen Gemeenschappelijke Afwikkelingsraad (SRB) · via Transparency: informing people
- Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679
2018-05-25 · final, Article 29 Working Party, bekrachtigd door de European Data Protection Board (EDPB) · via Transparency: informing people
- SCHUFA: a credit score on which third parties draw strongly is automated decision-making
2023-12-07 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Eerste kamer), OQ tegen Land Hessen, met SCHUFA Holding AG als interveniënt · via Transparency: informing people
- Schrems v Meta: no unlimited retention and aggregation of data for targeted advertising
2024-10-04 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Vierde kamer), Maximilian Schrems tegen Meta Platforms Ireland Limited · via Biometrics and emotion recognition
- IAB Europe: the TC String is personal data and the industry body is a joint controller
2024-03-07 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Vierde kamer), IAB Europe tegen Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit (België) · via Biometrics and emotion recognition
- Council of State: 600,000 euro fine for wifi tracking in Enschede stays annulled
2026-07-29 · final, Raad van State, Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak · via Biometrics and emotion recognition