Article 18: Documentation keeping
Praxikon tracks Article 18 (Documentation keeping) under the EU AI Act, citing the source for every statement.
Article 18 requires providers to keep documentation available to national authorities for at least ten years after the high-risk AI system is placed on the market or put into service.
Official text
Source: EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. Text reproduced verbatim.
Download AI Act (PDF) →Related enforcement
No enforcement actions for this article yet. Follow developments via the Enforcement Tracker.
Related blog posts
Related articles
Frequently asked questions
How long must documentation be kept under Article 18 AI Act?+
Which documents must be kept under Article 18?+
What documentation does Article 18 of the AI Act require?+
What Article 18 requires in practice
Connections
What connects to Article 18 AI Act
Themes where this returns
The counterpart in the other law
GDPR interpretation that also applies here6 of 9
- Noord-Nederland District Court upholds DPA fine for village livestream, reduces it to 375 euros
2025-01-09 · status not established, Rechtbank Noord-Nederland · via Keeping records: record of processing, technical documentation and logs
- Schrems v Meta: no unlimited retention and aggregation of data for targeted advertising
2024-10-04 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Vierde kamer), Maximilian Schrems tegen Meta Platforms Ireland Limited · via Keeping records: record of processing, technical documentation and logs
- Council of State: 600,000 euro fine for wifi tracking in Enschede stays annulled
2026-07-29 · final, Raad van State, Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak · via Keeping records: record of processing, technical documentation and logs
- Guidelines 02/2026 on Anonymisation
2026-07-07 · under consultation, European Data Protection Board (EDPB) · via Keeping records: record of processing, technical documentation and logs
- Gelderland District Court: bankruptcy trustee is controller, DPA fine for unsecured hard drive cut to 58,125 euros
2025-08-07 · status not established, Rechtbank Gelderland · via Keeping records: record of processing, technical documentation and logs
- Mousse: asking for Mr or Ms when selling a train ticket is not necessary
2025-01-09 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Eerste kamer), Mousse tegen Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) en SNCF Connect · via Keeping records: record of processing, technical documentation and logs