Article 27: Fundamental rights impact assessment for high-risk AI systems
Article 27 introduces the FRIA: an assessment of fundamental-rights impact before certain high-risk AI systems are deployed.
Praxikon tracks Article 27 (Fundamental rights impact assessment for high-risk AI systems) under the EU AI Act, citing the source for every statement.
Application dates
- : FRIA duty for applicable high-risk systems under Article 6(2) and Annex III
Official text
Source: EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. Text reproduced verbatim.
Download AI Act (PDF) →Decision tree
Do you need to carry out a FRIA?
A FRIA (fundamental rights impact assessment) is not mandatory for every deployer of a high-risk system. The obligation applies from 2 December 2027, before first use.
Question 1 · Art. 27(1) · Art. 6(2)
Are you, as deployer, going to deploy a high-risk AI system from Annex III (Article 6(2))?
High-risk systems via Annex I (safety components of products) do not fall under Article 27.
Full diagram
- 1
Are you, as deployer, going to deploy a high-risk AI system from Annex III (Article 6(2))?
Art. 27(1) · Art. 6(2)
- Yes → Question 2
- No → Outcome A
- 2
Is the system intended as a safety component in the management or operation of critical digital infrastructure, road traffic or the supply of water, gas, heating or electricity (Annex III point 2)?
Art. 27(1) · bijlage III punt 2
- Yes → Outcome B
- No → Question 3
- 3
Are you a body governed by public law, such as a ministry, municipality, province or water authority, or another organisation governed by public law?
Art. 27(1)
- Yes → Question 7
- No → Question 4
- 4
Are you a private entity providing public services, for example in education, healthcare, social services, housing or the administration of justice?
Art. 27(1) · overweging 96
- Yes → Question 7
- No → Question 5
- 5
Is the system intended to evaluate the creditworthiness of natural persons or establish their credit score, and not only to detect financial fraud?
Art. 27(1) · bijlage III punt 5 onder b
- Yes → Question 7
- No → Question 6
- 6
Is the system intended for risk assessment and pricing in relation to natural persons in the case of life and health insurance?
Art. 27(1) · bijlage III punt 5 onder c
- Yes → Question 7
- No → Outcome C
- 7
Have you already carried out a DPIA for this use under Article 35 GDPR?
Art. 27(4)
- Yes → Outcome E
- No → Outcome D
Outcome A · Does not apply
No FRIA obligation under Article 27
Article 27 only applies to deployers of high-risk systems from Annex III. If the system processes personal data, do check whether a DPIA is needed (Article 35 GDPR).
Art. 27(1) · art. 35 AVG
Outcome B · Does not apply
Critical infrastructure is excluded
There is no FRIA obligation for high-risk systems in Annex III point 2, not even for public bodies. The obligations of Article 26 still apply. The provider registers these systems at national level instead of in the EU database (Article 49(5)).
Art. 27(1) · bijlage III punt 2 · art. 26 · Art. 49(5)
Outcome C · Does not apply
No FRIA required, but the Article 26 obligations apply
As a private deployer outside the listed cases you need not carry out a FRIA. The obligations of Article 26 do apply. A voluntary fundamental rights check can help with human oversight and with a DPIA.
Art. 27(1) · art. 26
Outcome D · Applies
You must carry out a FRIA before first use
Describe your processes in which the system is used, the period and frequency, the groups affected, the specific risks of harm, the human oversight according to the instructions for use, and the measures if risks materialise, including governance and complaint mechanisms. Notify the results to the market surveillance authority with the filled-out template. In similar cases you may rely on a previous FRIA or an existing impact assessment by the provider; update the assessment when something changes (paragraph 2). For systems placed on the market or put into service before 2 December 2027, Article 111(2) applies: the regulation then only applies after a significant change in design, but for systems intended to be used by public authorities by 2 August 2030 at the latest.
Art. 27(1)(a) to f · Art. 27(2) · Art. 27(3) · Art. 27(5) · Art. 111(2)
Outcome E · Applies
You must carry out a FRIA and can build on your DPIA
Where part of the obligations is already met through the DPIA, you can cross-refer in the FRIA to the relevant sections of the DPIA or include those parts. The FRIA remains broader: it covers all fundamental rights, not only data protection. Notify the results to the market surveillance authority.
Art. 27(4) · Art. 27(1) · Art. 27(3) · art. 35 AVG
Official guidance on this article
6- Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Digital Omnibus on AIAllows a FRIA to include or cross-refer to relevant parts of a DPIA and requires the Commission template to support that route.PublishedRegulationEuropean Parliament and Council of the European Union24 Jul 2026
- Navigating the AI Act (Questions and Answers)Describes why and by whom a fundamental rights assessment must be carried out for high-risk applicationsPublishedQ&AEuropean Commission, DG CONNECT7 Aug 2026
- Statement 3/2024 on data protection authorities' role in the Artificial Intelligence Act frameworkPoints to the expected convergence between the fundamental rights impact assessment of Article 27(4) and the DPIA under GDPR, also via Article 26(9) and Annex VIII section C point 5, such that organisations must align both assessments with each other.PublishedOpinionEDPB (European Data Protection Board)16 Jul 2024
- EDPB Work Programme 2026-2027 (announcing joint guidelines on the interplay between the AI Act and the GDPR)Is expected to determine whether the fundamental rights impact assessment under Article 27 and the data protection impact assessment under the GDPR may be drawn up in a combined document, which makes the difference between one or two processes.AnnouncedGuidelinesEDPB (European Data Protection Board)11 Feb 2026
- ISO/IEC 42005:2025 Information technology - Artificial intelligence (AI) - AI system impact assessmentProvides a developed methodology and documentation structure for impact assessments, which can serve as a practical basis for the fundamental rights impact assessment taking effect from 2 December 2027.PublishedStandardISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42, Dutch adoption by NEN1 Jun 2025
- AI Regulation timeline (Algoritmekader)Links the fundamental rights assessment for public tasks as requirement aia-27 to the shifted high-risk date.PublishedNational guidanceMinistry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations (Algorithm Framework)17 Jul 2025
What does this mean for you?
Provider+
Deployer+
SME / Startup+
Public Sector+
Related tools
Related Recitals
Related enforcement
No enforcement actions for this article yet. Follow developments via the Enforcement Tracker.
Related blog posts
Cross-references
Annexes
Frequently asked questions
What is a FRIA and when is it mandatory?+
What should a FRIA contain?+
What documentation does Article 27 of the AI Act require?+
What is the difference between a FRIA and a DPIA?+
Who must carry out a FRIA?+
Is there a standard template available for the FRIA?+
Do I need to report the FRIA results to a supervisory authority?+
What Article 27 requires in practice
Connections
What connects to Article 27 AI Act
Themes where this returns
Where this meets the other law
- The FRIA may cross-refer to the DPIA, but does not replace it
may cross-refer to
The counterpart in the other law
GDPR interpretation that also applies here
- EDPB Template for Data Protection Impact Assessment
2026-04-14 · under consultation, European Data Protection Board (EDPB) · via Assessing risks in advance: DPIA and FRIA
- Guidelines on Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) and determining whether processing is likely to result in a high risk
2018-05-25 · final, Article 29 Working Party, bekrachtigd door de European Data Protection Board (EDPB) · via Assessing risks in advance: DPIA and FRIA
- Consultation on the draft list of processing operations for which no DPIA is required (Dutch DPA)
2026-06-24 · under consultation, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) · via Assessing risks in advance: DPIA and FRIA
- The Hague District Court cuts DPA fine on police for mobile camera cars without completed DPIA to 30,000 euros
2024-10-08 · status not established, Rechtbank Den Haag · via Assessing risks in advance: DPIA and FRIA
- Decision on the list of processing operations for which a DPIA is mandatory (Dutch DPA)
2019-11-27 · in force, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) · via Assessing risks in advance: DPIA and FRIA