Praxikon

Opinion

Response of the President of the Administrative Jurisdiction Division to the draft AI Regulation Implementation Act

PublishedCouncil of State, Administrative Jurisdiction Division8 Jul 2026

Letter of 8 July 2026 from the President of the Administrative Jurisdiction Division to the Ministry of Justice and Security, with response and implementing assessment to the draft bill. The Division endorses that market supervision of courts by courts takes place, but advises that the sandbox task and the agreements on uniform interpretation of terms should not apply to its President because this conflicts with judicial independence. It advises expanding its own supervision to AI systems that fall only under the transparency obligations, and signals a question of competence when it is unclear whether a system is prohibited or high-risk. The implementing assessment estimates approximately 1 full-time equivalent additional.

What this means for you

Shows that even within central government discussion continues about who exactly has competence, which is relevant for those preparing now for supervision.