Article 78: Right to an effective judicial remedy against a supervisory authority
Praxikon tracks Article 78 (Right to an effective judicial remedy against a supervisory authority) under the GDPR, alongside the EU AI Act, citing the source for every statement.
Official text
Source: EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Official text, reproduced without modification.
Cross-references
More case law, guidelines and fines
In addition to the overview at the bottom of this page: rulings, guidelines and fines that interpret or apply this article, newest first. Each item was checked against the official source.
Case law (2)
- 7 December 2023 · C-26/22, C-64/22 · CJEUSCHUFA (debt discharge)
A credit agency may not keep data on a debt discharge longer than the public register does. A supervisory authority's decision on a complaint is subject to full judicial review.
- 12 January 2023 · C-132/21 · CJEUBE v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság
A complaint to the supervisory authority and court proceedings against the controller can run concurrently and independently. Member States set the rules to avoid conflicting outcomes.
Guidelines and decisions (1)
- 26 November 2025 · (EU) 2025/2518 · EU legislatureRegulation laying down additional procedural rules for GDPR enforcement
Additional procedural rules for cross-border cases, covering among other things complaints, deadlines and the right to be heard. Applies from 2 April 2027.
Checked on 5 November 2026
Connections
What connects to Article 78 GDPR
Case law
- WhatsApp v EDPB: a binding EDPB dispute resolution decision can be challenged directly before the EU courts
2026-02-10 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Grote kamer), WhatsApp Ireland Ltd tegen Europees Comité voor gegevensbescherming (EDPB)
- Lindenapotheke: competitors may sue over GDPR breaches and pharmacy order data are health data
2024-10-04 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Grote kamer), ND tegen DR (twee Duitse apothekers)