Skip to main content
Praxikon
Back to the explorer
Actorv1.0.0

AI Office

The Commission office that supervises providers of general-purpose AI models. AI Office enforcement is active since 2 August 2026.

The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map

Address and citation

This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.

Identifier
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:ai-office
Payload hash (sha256)
22316f4ef249535428bf3fda894f06947441411820e6d05de779e863d0e37c3d

Citation line

Praxikon, "AI Office", praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:ai-office@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.2.0 (schema 1.5.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-09-06T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 22316f4ef249535428bf3fda894f06947441411820e6d05de779e863d0e37c3d
Version
1.0.0
Legal time (effective_at)
1 August 2024
Knowledge time (known_at)
8 August 2026
Closed on
Not closed
Topics
enforcement, governance, gpai

Review status: Editorially reviewed (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.

What this object links to

Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.

On this time pin this object has no relations that resolve.

What points at this object

What this role supervises

9 of 9 shown

This role supervises and receives the notifications. It is the institutional role, not the national body that fills it.

  1. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 52(1)-(6) with Article 51(1)-(3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Recitals 111 to 113

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 111(3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Guidelines for GPAI model providers

      Locator: Commission Guidelines C(2025) 5045 final, 18.7.2025, Section 3.2 points (60) to (67) and Sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.2, points (68) to (71)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-gpai-guidelines

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Articles 91-93, 101 and 113

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allApplies to the provider of a general-purpose AI model as soon as that model meets the condition in Article 51(1), point (a): high impact capabilities, which under Article 51(2) are presumed where the cumulative amount of computation used for its training, measured in floating point operations, is greater than 10^25. The two-week period runs from the moment that requirement is met or it becomes known that it will be met. The second route to systemic risk, a Commission designation under Article 51(1), point (b), or Article 52(4), is not covered here: Article 52(1) refers only to point (a).
    • ExceptionFor general-purpose AI models placed on the market before 2 August 2025, Article 111(3) provides that the provider shall take the necessary steps to comply with the obligations of this Regulation by 2 August 2027. For those models the governing date is therefore 2 August 2027 and not the two-week period.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 52: notification of a GPAI model with systemic risk

    Consequence

  2. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 54(1)-(6)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 3(5)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 113(3)(b)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 101(1)-(6)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 111(3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allApplies where the model qualifies as a general-purpose AI model within the meaning of Article 3(63), its provider is established in a third country, and that model is placed on the Union market. The appointment is made by written mandate within the meaning of Article 3(5), which is not only given but also accepted, and it is made before the model is placed on the market. The moment at which the latter occurs is fixed less sharply for a model than for a system; see the editorial interpretation.
    • Condition | any ofFor models placed on the market from 2 August 2025, the appointment duty applies from that moment. Providers of models placed on the market before 2 August 2025 shall, under Article 111(3), take the necessary steps to comply with the obligations of the Regulation by 2 August 2027.
    • ExceptionParagraph 6 excludes the obligation for providers of AI models released under a free and open-source licence that allows access, usage, modification and distribution, and whose parameters, including the weights, the information on the model architecture and the information on model usage, are made publicly available. That exception falls away as soon as the model presents a systemic risk. Whether a given release qualifies is a factual test that has not been settled anywhere; we read it narrowly, so a partially public release does not qualify.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 54: authorised representative of a provider of a GPAI model

    Consequence

  3. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 55(1)-(2) with Article 51 and Article 52

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe GPAI model has high-impact capabilities, presumed above 10^25 FLOPs of cumulative training compute, or is designated by the Commission.
    • ExceptionThe GPAI Code of Practice can, following the adequacy assessment, serve as a means to demonstrate compliance.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 55: GPAI models with systemic risk

    Consequence

  4. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 56(1)-(9)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Article 1, point (21), replacing Article 56(6)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | any ofArises for the provider of a general-purpose AI model: it may be invited under paragraph 3 to participate in the drawing up of a code of practice, and under paragraph 7 to adhere to a code of practice.
    • Condition | any ofArises for other stakeholders: paragraph 3 names civil society organisations, industry, academia and other relevant stakeholders, such as downstream providers and independent experts, that may support the process.
    • ExceptionParagraph 7 provides that for providers of general-purpose AI models not presenting systemic risks this adherence may be limited to the obligations provided for in Article 53, unless they declare explicitly their interest to join the full code. A provider without a systemic-risk model therefore does not have to sign up to the systemic-risk part in order to rely on the code.
    • ExceptionArticle 56 does not impose a separate obligation on the provider. Paragraphs 3 and 7 speak of inviting, not of requiring, and the obligations themselves remain those of Articles 53 and 55. Not signing is therefore not an infringement of Article 56.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 56: codes of practice for general-purpose AI models

    Consequence

  5. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 62(1) to (3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allThe priority access in paragraph 1, point (a), applies to SMEs, including start-ups, having a registered office or a branch in the Union, and only to the extent that they fulfil the eligibility conditions and selection criteria. The reduction of fees in paragraph 2 attaches to conformity assessments under Article 43 and to the capacity of an SME provider, including start-ups. Article 62 sits in Chapter VI, which is named in none of the three exceptions in the third paragraph of Article 113; the general date of application in the second paragraph therefore governs, 2 August 2026.
    • ExceptionParagraph 1, point (a), expressly states that the priority access shall not preclude other SMEs, including start-ups, other than those referred to in that paragraph from access to the AI regulatory sandbox, provided that they also fulfil the eligibility conditions and selection criteria. Priority is therefore an order of precedence and not an exclusive right, and it releases nobody from the eligibility conditions and selection criteria.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 62: measures for providers and deployers that are SMEs or start-ups

    Consequence

  6. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (31), Article 75(1a) and (1e)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allApplies to providers of AI systems that fall under the competence of the AI Office pursuant to Article 75(1) and that are classified as high-risk. The replaced paragraph 1 carries two independent routes, and the four carve-outs at (i) to (iv) sit inside point (a) alone. Along point (a) Annex I systems fall outside the competence, as do point 2 of Annex III and point 8 as regards the administration of justice; point 8(b), on influencing elections and referenda, is not carved out. Point (b) is a route of its own: a system that constitutes, or is integrated into, a designated very large online platform or very large online search engine falls under the competence of the AI Office even where one of the carve-outs in point (a) applies. Anyone testing point (a) alone places such a system outside this obligation wrongly. Those duties start to apply when Chapter III, Sections 1 to 3, becomes applicable, and that date depends on the route: 2 December 2027 for the route of Article 6(2) and Annex III, and 2 August 2028 for the route of Article 6(1) and Annex I, which point (b) can bring into view. The deadline_at field carries the earlier of the two.

    Relation recorded on: Article 75(1a) and (1e): reporting to and assessment by the AI Office

    Consequence

  7. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 75(2)-(3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (31), Article 75(1)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (31), Article 75(1b) to (1d) and (2a)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (32), Article 75a

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (32), Articles 75b, 75c and 75d

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | any ofApplies to AI systems based on a general-purpose AI model where the model and the system are developed by the same provider or by providers forming part of the same undertaking, and to AI systems that constitute or are integrated into a very large online platform or very large online search engine designated in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2022/2065. The exclusive competence applies to the providers of those systems, and to deployers only where they are also the provider or form part of the same undertaking as the provider.
    • Condition | allThe allocation of competence itself operates from 2 August 2026, because Article 75 sits in Chapter IX. It covers the obligations that apply at that moment, such as the prohibition in Article 5, the transparency duties of Article 50 and the obligations for general-purpose AI models. The two literal duties the amending regulation places on the provider, the reporting route of paragraph 1a and the fees of paragraph 1e, attach to high-risk status and therefore follow 2 December 2027; they sit in the separate object article-75-ai-office-high-risk-duties.
    • ExceptionParagraph 1, point (a) carves four groups out of the exclusive competence of the AI Office: AI systems related to products covered by the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Annex I, systems referred to in point 2 of Annex III, systems provided by law enforcement authorities, border management authorities and financial institutions insofar as they fall under Article 74(6), and systems referred to in point 8 of Annex III as regards the administration of justice. Who is competent instead differs per group and is not always "the market surveillance authority": for financial institutions Article 74(6) points to the national authority responsible for their financial supervision, and for law enforcement, border management and the administration of justice Article 74(8) has the Member State designate either the data protection supervisory authority or another authority under the same conditions. Which body that is per Member State does not follow from the Regulation.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 75: market surveillance, mutual assistance and the powers of the AI Office

    Consequence

  8. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 95(1) to (4)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allParagraph 1 expressly concerns AI systems other than high-risk AI systems, and the voluntary application to them of some or all of the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2. Paragraph 2 is wider and concerns the voluntary application, including by deployers, of specific requirements to all AI systems, on the basis of clear objectives and key performance indicators to measure the achievement of those objectives. Article 95 sits in Chapter X, which is named in none of the three exceptions in the third paragraph of Article 113; the general date of application in the second paragraph therefore governs, 2 August 2026.
    • Condition | any ofParagraph 3 sets out who may draw up a code of conduct: individual providers or deployers of AI systems, organisations representing them, or both, including with the involvement of any interested stakeholders and their representative organisations, including civil society organisations and academia. A code may cover one or more AI systems, taking into account the similarity of the intended purpose of the relevant systems.
    • ExceptionArticle 95 contains no provision that sets aside, suspends or replaces an obligation under this Regulation. The word voluntary refers to the application of requirements that precisely do not apply to the system concerned, and not to the requirements that do apply. A code of conduct on AI literacy leaves Article 4 untouched, and a code of conduct on transparency leaves Article 50 untouched.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 95: codes of conduct for voluntary application of specific requirements

    Consequence

  9. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 99(1)-(11)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (38)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 113, third paragraph, point (b)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (40)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 101(1)-(6)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 100(1)-(3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744

      Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (32)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | allRelevant as soon as you are an operator within the meaning of the Regulation, that is a provider, product manufacturer, deployer, authorised representative, importer or distributor, and one of the provisions named in Article 99(3), (4) or (5) is engaged. The Article 101 regime is additionally relevant where you are a provider of a general-purpose AI model, because there the Commission fines you itself. If you fall within the competence of the AI Office under Article 75(1), Article 75c is added on top.
    • ExceptionParagraph 6 reverses the calculation for SMEs, including start-ups: for them the lower of the percentage and the amount applies, where for other undertakings it is the higher of the two, and it does so for every fine referred to in Article 99. The inserted paragraph 6a does the same for small mid-cap enterprises, but expressly only for paragraphs 4 and 5, so the Article 5 band is not reversed for them. Paragraph 8 leaves it to each Member State to determine to what extent administrative fines may be imposed on public authorities and bodies established in that Member State, so the ceiling for a public organisation does not follow from the Regulation. Paragraph 9 allows the fine to be imposed by the competent national courts or by other bodies rather than by the authority in some Member States.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Article 99, 100 and 101: the penalty structure per obligation

    Consequence

When this applies

No condition recorded on this object.

When this does not apply

No exception recorded on this object.

Referring to this object

Citation block

Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.

Reference

Praxikon, "AI Office",
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:ai-office@1.0.0,
dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.2.0 (schema 1.5.0),
effective_at 2024-08-01T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z,
sha256 22316f4ef249535428bf3fda894f06947441411820e6d05de779e863d0e37c3d,
https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/actor/ai-office
(https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aactor%3Aai-office&effective_at=2024-08-01&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-09-15)

Short form

praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:ai-office@1.0.0 (sha256 22316f4e)

BibTeX

@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-actor-ai-office-1-0-0,
  author       = {{Praxikon}},
  title        = {AI Office},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {1.0.0},
  number       = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:ai-office},
  howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.2.0, schema 1.5.0},
  note         = {effective_at 2024-08-01T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 22316f4ef249535428bf3fda894f06947441411820e6d05de779e863d0e37c3d},
  url          = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/actor/ai-office},
  urldate      = {2026-09-15},
  language     = {en}
}

CSL JSON

[
  {
    "id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:ai-office@1.0.0",
    "type": "dataset",
    "title": "AI Office",
    "container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
    "publisher": "Praxikon",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:ai-office",
    "URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/actor/ai-office",
    "language": "en",
    "issued": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          8
        ]
      ]
    },
    "accessed": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          9,
          15
        ]
      ]
    },
    "note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.2.0; schema 1.5.0; effective_at 2024-08-01T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 22316f4ef249535428bf3fda894f06947441411820e6d05de779e863d0e37c3d; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aactor%3Aai-office&effective_at=2024-08-01&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
  }
]

How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms

For agents and integrations

This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.

Open as JSONOpen as JSON-LDRead the methodology