Article 17: Right to erasure (‘right to be forgotten’)AI-relevant
Praxikon tracks Article 17 (Right to erasure (‘right to be forgotten’)) under the GDPR, alongside the EU AI Act, citing the source for every statement.
What does Article 17 govern?
Article 17 gives everyone the right to have their personal data erased and obliges the controller to do so without undue delay in six situations (paragraph 1): the data are no longer necessary for the purpose, consent has been withdrawn and no other legal ground exists, an objection has been made under Article 21, the processing was unlawful, a legal obligation requires erasure, or the data were collected from a child in relation to an online service referred to in Article 8(1). If you have made the data public, you take reasonable steps to inform other controllers that the data subject has requested erasure of links and copies (paragraph 2). Paragraph 3 lists the exceptions: freedom of expression, a legal obligation or task in the public interest, public health, archiving and research, and legal claims. The article exists because keeping data that are no longer necessary or were processed unlawfully infringes the Regulation, and because people, especially those who gave consent as a child, must be able to have data removed from the internet later (recitals 65 and 66).
Key term: Right to erasure: the right to have your data deleted when there is no longer a valid reason to keep them
Directly affects:controllerdata subject
Praxikon’s reading of the text and the recitals; the official text below prevails.
Official text
Source: EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Official text, reproduced without modification.
What does this mean for you?
Controller
You test every erasure request against the six grounds in paragraph 1 and erase the data without undue delay where one of them applies, including data you use in, for example, an AI application. Where you have made the data public, you take reasonable steps, taking account of available technology and cost, to inform other controllers of the request (paragraph 2). If you refuse, that rests on an exception in paragraph 3, such as a statutory retention obligation, and you explain the reasons in line with Article 12(4).
Data Subject
You can ask for erasure in the situations of paragraph 1, for example when you withdraw consent, when the data are no longer needed or when you have objected. This also applies to data you provided as a child, even now that you are an adult (recital 65). Where one of those situations applies, the controller may refuse only for the reasons in paragraph 3 and must then explain why.
Compliance checklist
Related recitals
A data subject should have the right to have personal data concerning him or her rectified and a ‘right to be forgotten’ where the retention of such data infringes this Regulation or Union or Member S...
(66)To strengthen the right to be forgotten in the online environment, the right to erasure should also be extended in such a way that a controller who has made the personal data public should be obliged ...
Cross-references
Frequently asked questions
Connections
What connects to Article 17 GDPR
Case law
- Council of State upholds 6,000 euro DPA fine for recruitment firm
2024-05-29 · final, Raad van State, Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak
- Legal Newsdesk Sweden: paid online publication of criminal convictions is in principle not journalism, national exemptions may not switch off the GDPR
2026-07-09 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Vijfde kamer), ND tegen Legal Newsdesk Sweden AB (voorheen Garrapatica AB)
- Council of State: DPA could fine DPG Media for routinely demanding ID copies, fine halved to 262,500 euros
2025-09-24 · final, Raad van State, Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak
Guidelines
- Guidelines 02/2025 on processing of personal data through blockchain technologies
2026-07-07 · final, European Data Protection Board (EDPB)
- Guidelines 1/2026 on processing of personal data for scientific research purposes
2026-04-15 · adopted, European Data Protection Board (EDPB)
Enforcement and fines
- 6,000 euro fine for Ambitious People Group for ignoring erasure requests
2020-07-30 · final, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens