Map of the AI Act
File of reports about AI systems
The map shows what hangs off this object: who carries the duty, what it calls for, what it is evidenced by and what it rests on. Click an object and it becomes the new centre.
On a small screen the map reads as a path rather than as a network.
evidence
File of reports about AI systems
Per report: what was reported, about which system and which version, what was done with it, when feedback was given and who handled it. The deadlines against which that is measured sit in Article 9(1) of Directive (EU) 2019/1937: acknowledgement of receipt within seven days (point (b)) and feedback within three months (point (f)). This file has limits that are as hard as the record keeping itself: the identity of the person reporting stays shielded and does not travel with the substantive follow-up (Article 16), nothing is retained longer than necessary and proportionate (Article 18(1)), and an oral report is recorded only with the consent of the person reporting (Article 18(2) to (4)). Without those limits the file is itself a risk, including under the GDPR.
based on
- Article 87 on EUR-Lexguidance
relates to
Read at 2 Dec 2027. What did not yet apply on that date is not shown here. The requirements for high-risk systems under Annex III apply, together with the FRIA.