Face comparison at the border gate: verification or identification
An automated border gate uses biometric facial recognition to compare a traveller’s face with the photo in the passport chip. The same camera could technically also compare against a law-enforcement database, and exactly that difference decides whether this biometrics is high-risk.
The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map
Address and citation
This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.
- Identifier
praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-biometrische-verificatie-grenspoort- Payload hash (sha256)
e2f0da23dce88ea57a597d35e2ab6c9bbf07dbbf6bbc17182bbb2203a51e218c
Citation line
Praxikon, "Face comparison at the border gate: verification or identification", praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-biometrische-verificatie-grenspoort@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 e2f0da23dce88ea57a597d35e2ab6c9bbf07dbbf6bbc17182bbb2203a51e218c- Version
- 1.0.0
- Legal time (effective_at)
- 19 May 2026
- Knowledge time (known_at)
- 8 August 2026
- Closed on
- Not closed
- Topics
- examples
Review status: Placed against the official source (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.
What this object links to
Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.
The obligation this hangs off
1 of 1 shown
The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems
Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex III, paragraph (136)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
ObligationAnnex III: high-risk AI
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:annex-iii-high-risk
What this object is about
1 of 1 shown
The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems
Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex III, paragraph (136)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
ActorDeployer
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:deployer
What this object states
Official fact
Attributable to a named primary source, with a locator. Where they differ, the official source prevails.
The Commission draft guidelines of 19 May 2026 state that biometric verification falls outside the high-risk classification: one-to-one comparison of presented biometrics with previously stored biometrics, for the sole purpose of confirming that a person is who they claim to be. Where the same capture is additionally compared against a law-enforcement database, it does become remote biometric identification. The document is a consultation version: non-binding and not yet final.
- Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex III, paragraph (136)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source
Our interpretation
Our own reading. It can change without the law changing, and it is not the position of a supervisory authority.
Test your biometric application on purpose rather than technology: the same camera and the same model stay outside the high-risk route as long as the comparison is one-to-one and only confirms identity, and fall inside it as soon as that same capture is also held against a database. Record per application what the comparison runs against, because that single design choice moves the entire regime.
- Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex III, paragraph (136)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source
When this applies
No condition recorded on this object.
When this does not apply
No exception recorded on this object.
Referring to this object
Citation block
Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.
Reference
Praxikon, "Face comparison at the border gate: verification or identification", praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-biometrische-verificatie-grenspoort@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-05-19T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 e2f0da23dce88ea57a597d35e2ab6c9bbf07dbbf6bbc17182bbb2203a51e218c, https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-biometrische-verificatie-grenspoort (https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aexample%3Aexample-biometrische-verificatie-grenspoort&effective_at=2026-05-19&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-25)
Short form
praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-biometrische-verificatie-grenspoort@1.0.0 (sha256 e2f0da23)
BibTeX
@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-example-example-biometrische-verificatie-grenspoort-1-0-0,
author = {{Praxikon}},
title = {Face comparison at the border gate: verification or identification},
year = {2026},
version = {1.0.0},
number = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-biometrische-verificatie-grenspoort},
howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
note = {effective_at 2026-05-19T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 e2f0da23dce88ea57a597d35e2ab6c9bbf07dbbf6bbc17182bbb2203a51e218c},
url = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-biometrische-verificatie-grenspoort},
urldate = {2026-08-25},
language = {en}
}CSL JSON
[
{
"id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-biometrische-verificatie-grenspoort@1.0.0",
"type": "dataset",
"title": "Face comparison at the border gate: verification or identification",
"container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
"publisher": "Praxikon",
"version": "1.0.0",
"number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-biometrische-verificatie-grenspoort",
"URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-biometrische-verificatie-grenspoort",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
8
]
]
},
"accessed": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
25
]
]
},
"note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-05-19T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 e2f0da23dce88ea57a597d35e2ab6c9bbf07dbbf6bbc17182bbb2203a51e218c; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aexample%3Aexample-biometrische-verificatie-grenspoort&effective_at=2026-05-19&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
}
]How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms
For agents and integrations
This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.