Health insurer using AI for risk assessment: public or private makes no difference
A health insurer uses AI for risk assessment and pricing of health and life insurance. The question is whether this falls under point 5(c) of Annex III, and with that whether the Article 27 FRIA duty comes into play.
The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map
Address and citation
This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.
- Identifier
praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-fria-zorgverzekeraar-risicobeoordeling- Payload hash (sha256)
da4c33f856bb8621e0a1ecad5647b97f9511b86d1c9cc729d555166238398e7e
Citation line
Praxikon, "Health insurer using AI for risk assessment: public or private makes no difference", praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-fria-zorgverzekeraar-risicobeoordeling@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 da4c33f856bb8621e0a1ecad5647b97f9511b86d1c9cc729d555166238398e7e- Version
- 1.0.0
- Legal time (effective_at)
- 19 May 2026
- Knowledge time (known_at)
- 8 August 2026
- Closed on
- Not closed
- Topics
- examples
Review status: Placed against the official source (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.
What this object links to
Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.
The obligation this hangs off
1 of 1 shown
The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems
Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex III, paragraphs (319) to (321)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
ObligationArticle 27: FRIA
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-27-fria
What this object is about
1 of 1 shown
The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems
Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex III, paragraphs (319) to (321)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
ActorDeployer
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:deployer
What this object states
Official fact
Attributable to a named primary source, with a locator. Where they differ, the official source prevails.
The Commission draft guidelines of 19 May 2026 state that the health and life insurance in point 5(c) may be offered on a private or a public basis: a health insurer governed by public law also falls within it, so long as the system is intended for risk assessment or pricing with regard to natural persons. Privately serviced health insurance counts as an essential private service, even in a Member State with a public healthcare system. Unlike point 5(b), point 5(c) provides no exception for fraud detection. The document is a consultation version: non-binding and not yet final.
- Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex III, paragraphs (319) to (321)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source
Our interpretation
Our own reading. It can change without the law changing, and it is not the position of a supervisory authority.
For the FRIA question point 5(c) counts twice: it makes the system high-risk and it makes you, as deployer, one of the parties Article 27 names. A public-law form or a public healthcare system in your Member State changes nothing there. Do not count on the fraud-detection exception from point 5(b) either: it does not apply here, and a fraud feature alongside risk assessment does not take the system out.
- Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex III, paragraphs (319) to (321)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source
When this applies
No condition recorded on this object.
When this does not apply
No exception recorded on this object.
Referring to this object
Citation block
Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.
Reference
Praxikon, "Health insurer using AI for risk assessment: public or private makes no difference", praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-fria-zorgverzekeraar-risicobeoordeling@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-05-19T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 da4c33f856bb8621e0a1ecad5647b97f9511b86d1c9cc729d555166238398e7e, https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-fria-zorgverzekeraar-risicobeoordeling (https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aexample%3Aexample-fria-zorgverzekeraar-risicobeoordeling&effective_at=2026-05-19&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-25)
Short form
praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-fria-zorgverzekeraar-risicobeoordeling@1.0.0 (sha256 da4c33f8)
BibTeX
@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-example-example-fria-zorgverzekeraar-risicobeoordeling-1-0-0,
author = {{Praxikon}},
title = {Health insurer using AI for risk assessment: public or private makes no difference},
year = {2026},
version = {1.0.0},
number = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-fria-zorgverzekeraar-risicobeoordeling},
howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
note = {effective_at 2026-05-19T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 da4c33f856bb8621e0a1ecad5647b97f9511b86d1c9cc729d555166238398e7e},
url = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-fria-zorgverzekeraar-risicobeoordeling},
urldate = {2026-08-25},
language = {en}
}CSL JSON
[
{
"id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-fria-zorgverzekeraar-risicobeoordeling@1.0.0",
"type": "dataset",
"title": "Health insurer using AI for risk assessment: public or private makes no difference",
"container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
"publisher": "Praxikon",
"version": "1.0.0",
"number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-fria-zorgverzekeraar-risicobeoordeling",
"URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-fria-zorgverzekeraar-risicobeoordeling",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
8
]
]
},
"accessed": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
25
]
]
},
"note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-05-19T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 da4c33f856bb8621e0a1ecad5647b97f9511b86d1c9cc729d555166238398e7e; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aexample%3Aexample-fria-zorgverzekeraar-risicobeoordeling&effective_at=2026-05-19&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
}
]How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms
For agents and integrations
This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.