Money laundering detection by an accounting firm under its own legal duty
An accounting firm deploys an AI system that detects money laundering, in order to comply with its own obligations under EU anti-money laundering legislation.
The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map
Address and citation
This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.
- Identifier
praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-aml-detection-by-accounting-firm- Payload hash (sha256)
b18929aa59e2a4f132780d5e97215ee0c7c9960204c7d54d7edce1cdc88081ee
Citation line
Praxikon, "Money laundering detection by an accounting firm under its own legal duty", praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-aml-detection-by-accounting-firm@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 b18929aa59e2a4f132780d5e97215ee0c7c9960204c7d54d7edce1cdc88081ee- Version
- 1.0.0
- Legal time (effective_at)
- 8 August 2026
- Knowledge time (known_at)
- 8 August 2026
- Closed on
- Not closed
- Topics
- examples
Review status: Placed against the official source (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.
What this object links to
Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.
The obligation this hangs off
1 of 1 shown
The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems
Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex III
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
ObligationAnnex III: high-risk AI
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:annex-iii-high-risk
What this object is about
1 of 1 shown
The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems
Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex III
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
ActorDeployer
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:deployer
What this object states
Official fact
Attributable to a named primary source, with a locator. Where they differ, the official source prevails.
The Commission draft guidelines of 19 May 2026 address this case when determining whether an application falls under Annex III. The document is a consultation version: non-binding and not yet final.
- Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex IIIpraxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source
Our interpretation
Our own reading. It can change without the law changing, and it is not the position of a supervisory authority.
Check whether you are meeting your own legal duty or taking over a task from a public authority, because only in the second case do you act on its behalf and enter the law enforcement regime.
- Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex IIIpraxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source
When this applies
No condition recorded on this object.
When this does not apply
No exception recorded on this object.
Referring to this object
Citation block
Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.
Reference
Praxikon, "Money laundering detection by an accounting firm under its own legal duty", praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-aml-detection-by-accounting-firm@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 b18929aa59e2a4f132780d5e97215ee0c7c9960204c7d54d7edce1cdc88081ee, https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-high-risk-aml-detection-by-accounting-firm (https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aexample%3Aexample-high-risk-aml-detection-by-accounting-firm&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-25)
Short form
praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-aml-detection-by-accounting-firm@1.0.0 (sha256 b18929aa)
BibTeX
@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-example-example-high-risk-aml-detection-by-accounting-firm-1-0-0,
author = {{Praxikon}},
title = {Money laundering detection by an accounting firm under its own legal duty},
year = {2026},
version = {1.0.0},
number = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-aml-detection-by-accounting-firm},
howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
note = {effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 b18929aa59e2a4f132780d5e97215ee0c7c9960204c7d54d7edce1cdc88081ee},
url = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-high-risk-aml-detection-by-accounting-firm},
urldate = {2026-08-25},
language = {en}
}CSL JSON
[
{
"id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-aml-detection-by-accounting-firm@1.0.0",
"type": "dataset",
"title": "Money laundering detection by an accounting firm under its own legal duty",
"container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
"publisher": "Praxikon",
"version": "1.0.0",
"number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-aml-detection-by-accounting-firm",
"URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-high-risk-aml-detection-by-accounting-firm",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
8
]
]
},
"accessed": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
25
]
]
},
"note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 b18929aa59e2a4f132780d5e97215ee0c7c9960204c7d54d7edce1cdc88081ee; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aexample%3Aexample-high-risk-aml-detection-by-accounting-firm&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
}
]How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms
For agents and integrations
This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.