Explorer
Why this object hangs off that object
Every object in this graph has its own address and can be cited on its own. This page shows which objects exist and, once you open one, why it hangs off another: from which source with its locator, through which condition or exception, to which consequence.
Since the last release an obligation states separately who carries the duty and who is merely affected. Filter by duty holder and you get the duties resting on a role; filter by actor and you get everything that is about that role. That difference is visible on purpose.
This is the knowledge layer under the four levels of the assessment. See the four levels.
Filters
Only dimensions the data carries. A dimension without values is absent rather than empty.
Objects
19 objects in this selection.
- Evidencev1.0.02 relations
Article 6 and Annex III classification record
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:annex-iii-classification-record
Traceable rationale covering intended purpose, Annex III category, Article 6(3) assessment and registration decision.
Editorially reviewed | evidence, high-risk
- Evidencev1.0.02 relations
Data governance file
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-10-data-governance-record
Record per dataset of origin, choices, assumptions, bias examination and mitigations.
Editorially reviewed | evidence, high-risk-requirements
- Evidencev1.0.01 relations
Technical file (Annex IV)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-11-technical-documentation-record
Technical documentation kept current per system version, ready for a supervisor’s request.
Editorially reviewed | evidence, high-risk-requirements
- Evidencev1.0.02 relations
Logs and retention regime
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-12-logging-record
Log files with a retention period appropriate to the purpose and at least six months for deployers (Articles 19 and 26).
Editorially reviewed | evidence, high-risk-requirements
- Evidencev1.0.02 relations
Instructions and interpretation file
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-13-instructions-record
The received instructions for use plus their internal translation into work instructions per role.
Editorially reviewed | evidence, high-risk-requirements
- Evidencev1.0.02 relations
Oversight file per system
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-14-human-oversight-record
Record of oversight measures, appointed persons, their training and the moments of intervention.
Editorially reviewed | evidence, high-risk-requirements
- Evidencev1.0.01 relations
Performance and security file
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-15-accuracy-robustness-record
Declared accuracy levels, test results, and measures against data poisoning and adversarial attacks among others.
Editorially reviewed | evidence, high-risk-requirements
- Evidencev1.0.01 relations
QMS documentation
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-17-quality-management-record
The documented quality system with procedures, role assignment and references to the underlying files.
Editorially reviewed | evidence, high-risk-requirements
- Evidencev1.0.04 relations
AI literacy measures record
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-4-measures-record
Versioned record of roles, context, measures, participation or instruction and review moments.
Hangs off: Article 4: AI literacy
Editorially reviewed | ai-literacy, evidence
- Evidencev1.0.04 relations
Article 5 screening record
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-5-screening-record
A record per system that the Article 5 screening was performed, with outcome and reasoning. The conclusion "no prohibited practice" is evidence too.
Hangs off: Article 5: prohibited practices
Editorially reviewed | evidence, prohibited-practices
- Evidencev1.0.02 relations
Transparency implementation record
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-50-implementation-record
Record of scenario, actor, disclosure or marking, technical implementation, test and owner.
Editorially reviewed | evidence, transparency
- Evidencev1.0.01 relations
Systemic-risk file
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-55-gpai-systemic-risk-record
Evaluation results, risk assessments, mitigations, incident reports and security measures per model version.
Editorially reviewed | evidence, gpai-systemic-risk
- Evidencev1.0.02 relations
Monitoring plan and reports
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-72-post-market-monitoring-record
The plan as part of the technical documentation plus the periodic analyses and follow-up actions.
Editorially reviewed | evidence, post-market
- Evidencev1.0.02 relations
Incident register and reports
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-73-incident-reporting-record
Record of incidents, analyses, reports to supervisors and corrective measures.
Editorially reviewed | evidence, post-market
- Evidencev1.0.01 relations
Risk management file
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-9-risk-management-record
Versioned record of risk analyses, chosen measures, residual risks and test results per system version.
Editorially reviewed | evidence, high-risk-requirements
- Evidencev1.0.02 relations
Conformity file
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:conformity-ce-registration-record
The assessment, EU declaration of conformity, CE marking and registration proof, per system version.
Editorially reviewed | conformity, evidence
Dated impact assessment, measures, residual risks and, where required, notification to the market surveillance authority.
Editorially reviewed | evidence, fundamental-rights
Current technical documentation, downstream information, copyright policy and public training summary.
Editorially reviewed | evidence, gpai
- Evidencev1.0.02 relations
Value-chain file
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:value-chain-representative-record
Record per system of role, contractual arrangements on information and cooperation, and the appointment of a representative where required.
Editorially reviewed | evidence, value-chain
What this explorer does not do
- There is no article object. The article sits as a locator on the citations of an obligation, as free text. Filtering on the obligation is the same question, and the data does carry that.
- No object carries an Annex III domain or use case. A selection of the form "systems for this purpose" cannot be expressed here.
- A locator hangs on a statement in the data, not on a relation. The source next to a path is the source anchor of the object carrying the relation, not proof of that one connection.
- The split between duty holder and affected actor exists on obligations only. On every other type the actor list is still one undifferentiated list.
- The graph stores no inverse relations. The incoming direction is computed here over the same release and adds nothing to the data.
- Topics are free slugs, not a taxonomy with objects, labels or a hierarchy of their own.
The same selection as data
The explorer and the API read the same object against the same two time axes. What you see here can be fetched with the same parameters.