Article 56: Competence of the lead supervisory authority
Praxikon tracks Article 56 (Competence of the lead supervisory authority) under the GDPR, alongside the EU AI Act, citing the source for every statement.
Official text
Source: EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Official text, reproduced without modification.
Cross-references
More case law, guidelines and fines
In addition to the overview at the bottom of this page: rulings, guidelines and fines that interpret or apply this article, newest first. Each item was checked against the official source.
Case law (1)
- 15 June 2021 · C-645/19 · CJEUFacebook Ireland v GBA
A supervisory authority that is not the lead authority may only take cross-border processing to its national court in the cases where the GDPR gives it competence, and while respecting the cooperation procedures.
Guidelines and decisions (3)
- 26 November 2025 · (EU) 2025/2518 · EU legislatureRegulation laying down additional procedural rules for GDPR enforcement
Additional procedural rules for cross-border cases, covering among other things complaints, deadlines and the right to be heard. Applies from 2 April 2027.
- 28 March 2023 · v2.1 · EDPBGuidelines 8/2022 on identifying a controller or processor's lead supervisory authority
Describes how the main establishment, and therefore the lead supervisory authority, is determined for cross-border processing.
- 14 March 2022 · v1.0 · EDPBGuidelines 02/2022 on the application of Article 60 GDPR
Explains step by step how the lead supervisory authority and the concerned authorities cooperate in cross-border cases under the one-stop-shop mechanism.
Line of case lawSupervision and fines
Who enforces how, and who can be fined?
- Facebook Ireland v GBA (2021)The lead authority is the contact point, but others may go to court under conditions.
- Guidelines 04/2022 on the calculation of administrative fines under the GDPR (2023)The EDPB sets the method for calculating fines.
- Deutsche Wohnen (2023)A legal person can be fined directly, but only for intent or negligence.
- Nacionalinis visuomenės sveikatos centras (2023)Processing by your processor can also lead to a fine.
- Land Hessen (2024)Not every breach calls for a corrective measure.
- Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde v FR (2025)Complaints are only excessive once abuse is shown.
- ILVA (2025)The fine cap follows the turnover of the whole group.
- Regulation laying down additional procedural rules for GDPR enforcement (2025)New procedural rules for cross-border cases, from 2 April 2027.
- WhatsApp Ireland v EDPB (2026)A binding EDPB decision can be challenged directly.
- Guidelines 04/2026 on the application of the power to impose administrative fines in relation to other corrective powers under the GDPR (2026)The EDPB on how fines relate to other corrective powers.
Checked on 5 November 2026
Connections
What connects to Article 56 GDPR
Case law
- Meta v Bundeskartellamt: competition authority may find a GDPR breach, strict conditions for legal bases behind personalised advertising
2023-07-04 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Grote kamer), Meta Platforms Inc., Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd en Facebook Deutschland GmbH tegen Bundeskartellamt