Ruling
Reddit's summary proceedings against the DPA over a penalty order and legal privilege dismissed
- Date
- Status
- status not established
- Body
- Rechtbank Den Haag, voorzieningenrechter
- Reference
- ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2026:4248; C/09/697042 / KG ZA 26/2
What it is about
Since March 2025 the DPA, as lead authority, has investigated whether Reddit lawfully makes users' public content available through its API to AI model developers. Because Reddit refused access to internal systems (Jira, Google Vault, SWAT Tables), on 26 January 2026 the DPA imposed an order subject to a penalty for breach of the duty to cooperate (Articles 31 and 58(1) GDPR with Articles 5:16, 5:17 and 5:20 of the General Administrative Law Act). Reddit sought, among other things, safeguards for legal privilege in summary proceedings. The court refused the relief because objections to the order and to the DPA's handling of privileged material can be reviewed by the administrative court. Reddit bears the costs.
What this means in practice
The DPA can demand access to your internal systems during an investigation and enforce it with an order subject to a penalty. If you dispute such an order and the DPA's handling of privileged material, the route is in principle objection and appeal before the administrative court; civil summary proceedings offer no way around that. Before an investigation starts, record which documents are privileged and how you flag them.
The GDPR articles concerned
Source: Rechtspraak.nlchecked on 15 September 2026
Summary and practical reading by Praxikon. Not legal advice; the source prevails.
Connections
What connects to this development
Themes where this returns
The counterpart in the other law
Case law
- Interim judge suspends DPA penalty order against Northwave: exhaust powers against the hosting provider first
2024-03-26 · final, Rechtbank Midden-Nederland, voorzieningenrechter (zittingsplaats Utrecht)
- Deutsche Wohnen: a fine on a legal person needs no identified natural person, but does require fault
2023-12-05 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Grote kamer), Deutsche Wohnen SE tegen Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin
- Land Hessen: the supervisory authority need not always fine where the organisation already remedied the breach
2024-09-26 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Eerste kamer), TR tegen Land Hessen
- Schrems II: Privacy Shield invalid, transfers under standard clauses only with essentially equivalent protection
2020-07-16 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Grote kamer), Data Protection Commissioner tegen Facebook Ireland Ltd en Maximillian Schrems
- Council of State: DPA could fine DPG Media for routinely demanding ID copies, fine halved to 262,500 euros
2025-09-24 · final, Raad van State, Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak
Guidelines
- Consultation on the Dutch DPA's enforcement policy (April 2026)
2026-04-13 · under consultation, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
Enforcement and fines
- Ten municipalities fined a total of 250,000 euros for unlawful files on Muslim residents
2026-02-03 · final, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
- Formal warning to the Dutch Minister of Education, Culture and Science not to put the CABR war archive online and searchable
2024-11-26 · final, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
Legislation in motion
- Amendment to the Dutch GDPR Implementation Act: DPA must publish GDPR sanctions from 1 September 2026
2026-09-01 · in force, Wetgever (Tweede Kamer) en Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens