ControlApplicablev1.0.0

Intake and deadline tracking for a demand or an inspection

The control that ensures an information request, a notice of investigation or an announced inspection from the AI Office reaches an identifiable person, that it is first established whether it is a simple request or a decision, that the period set is tracked, and that what was supplied is recorded. The substance is sanctioned too: a periodic penalty payment can be imposed where you fail to give correct or complete answers during an ordered inspection, and incorrect, incomplete or misleading information supplied to the Office falls under the fines of Article 99(5). A retention order under Article 75a(6) belongs in this control, because it overrides your deletion routines.

The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map

Address and citation

This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.

Identifier: praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:ai-office-proceeding-response
Payload hash (sha256): 2a14d942690776abc57ebe1894061fb661d761a1be59c4d37f67ce71a63a0fcf

Citation line

Praxikon, "Intake and deadline tracking for a demand or an inspection", praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:ai-office-proceeding-response@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.2.0 (schema 1.5.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-09-06T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 2a14d942690776abc57ebe1894061fb661d761a1be59c4d37f67ce71a63a0fcf

Version: 1.0.0
Legal time (effective_at): 8 August 2026
Knowledge time (known_at): 14 August 2026
Closed on: Not closed
Application date: 2 August 2026
Topics: control, enforcement

Review status: Editorially reviewed (14 August 2026). Next check due by 10 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.

What this object links to

Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.

The obligation this hangs off

2 of 2 shown

The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.

Source
This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.
- Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
  Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (31), Article 75(1a) and (1e)
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
  Open official source
- EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
  Locator: Article 75(2)-(3)
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
  Open official source
- Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
  Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (31), Article 75(1)
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
  Open official source
- Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
  Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (31), Article 75(1b) to (1d) and (2a)
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
  Open official source
- Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
  Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (32), Article 75a
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
  Open official source
- Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
  Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (32), Articles 75b, 75c and 75d
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
  Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
- ObligationArticle 75(1a) and (1e): reporting to and assessment by the AI Office
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-75-ai-office-high-risk-duties
- ObligationArticle 75: market surveillance, mutual assistance and the powers of the AI Office
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-75-market-surveillance-assistance

What this object is about

1 of 1 shown

The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.

Source
This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.
- Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
  Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (31), Article 75(1a) and (1e)
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
  Open official source
- EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
  Locator: Article 75(2)-(3)
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
  Open official source
- Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
  Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (31), Article 75(1)
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
  Open official source
- Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
  Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (31), Article 75(1b) to (1d) and (2a)
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
  Open official source
- Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
  Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (32), Article 75a
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
  Open official source
- Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
  Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (32), Articles 75b, 75c and 75d
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
  Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
- ActorProvider of an AI system
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider

What points at this object

Where this control comes from

2 of 2 shown

This is what keeps compliance in place over time, periodic or event-driven.

Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
- Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
  Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (31), Article 75(1a) and (1e)
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
  Open official source
Via
- Condition | allApplies to providers of AI systems that fall under the competence of the AI Office pursuant to Article 75(1) and that are classified as high-risk. The replaced paragraph 1 carries two independent routes, and the four carve-outs at (i) to (iv) sit inside point (a) alone. Along point (a) Annex I systems fall outside the competence, as do point 2 of Annex III and point 8 as regards the administration of justice; point 8(b), on influencing elections and referenda, is not carved out. Point (b) is a route of its own: a system that constitutes, or is integrated into, a designated very large online platform or very large online search engine falls under the competence of the AI Office even where one of the carve-outs in point (a) applies. Anyone testing point (a) alone places such a system outside this obligation wrongly. Those duties start to apply when Chapter III, Sections 1 to 3, becomes applicable, and that date depends on the route: 2 December 2027 for the route of Article 6(2) and Annex III, and 2 August 2028 for the route of Article 6(1) and Annex I, which point (b) can bring into view. The deadline_at field carries the earlier of the two.
Relation recorded on: Article 75(1a) and (1e): reporting to and assessment by the AI Office
Consequence
- ObligationArticle 75(1a) and (1e): reporting to and assessment by the AI Office
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-75-ai-office-high-risk-duties
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
- EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
  Locator: Article 75(2)-(3)
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
  Open official source
- Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
  Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (31), Article 75(1)
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
  Open official source
- Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
  Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (31), Article 75(1b) to (1d) and (2a)
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
  Open official source
- Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
  Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (32), Article 75a
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
  Open official source
- Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
  Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (32), Articles 75b, 75c and 75d
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
  Open official source
Via
- Condition | any ofApplies to AI systems based on a general-purpose AI model where the model and the system are developed by the same provider or by providers forming part of the same undertaking, and to AI systems that constitute or are integrated into a very large online platform or very large online search engine designated in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2022/2065. The exclusive competence applies to the providers of those systems, and to deployers only where they are also the provider or form part of the same undertaking as the provider.
- Condition | allThe allocation of competence itself operates from 2 August 2026, because Article 75 sits in Chapter IX. It covers the obligations that apply at that moment, such as the prohibition in Article 5, the transparency duties of Article 50 and the obligations for general-purpose AI models. The two literal duties the amending regulation places on the provider, the reporting route of paragraph 1a and the fees of paragraph 1e, attach to high-risk status and therefore follow 2 December 2027; they sit in the separate object article-75-ai-office-high-risk-duties.
- ExceptionParagraph 1, point (a) carves four groups out of the exclusive competence of the AI Office: AI systems related to products covered by the Union harmonisation legislation listed in Annex I, systems referred to in point 2 of Annex III, systems provided by law enforcement authorities, border management authorities and financial institutions insofar as they fall under Article 74(6), and systems referred to in point 8 of Annex III as regards the administration of justice. Who is competent instead differs per group and is not always "the market surveillance authority": for financial institutions Article 74(6) points to the national authority responsible for their financial supervision, and for law enforcement, border management and the administration of justice Article 74(8) has the Member State designate either the data protection supervisory authority or another authority under the same conditions. Which body that is per Member State does not follow from the Regulation.
As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.
Relation recorded on: Article 75: market surveillance, mutual assistance and the powers of the AI Office
Consequence
- ObligationArticle 75: market surveillance, mutual assistance and the powers of the AI Office
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-75-market-surveillance-assistance

When this applies

No condition recorded on this object.

When this does not apply

No exception recorded on this object.

Referring to this object

Citation block

Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.

Reference

Praxikon, "Intake and deadline tracking for a demand or an inspection",
praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:ai-office-proceeding-response@1.0.0,
dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.2.0 (schema 1.5.0),
effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z,
sha256 2a14d942690776abc57ebe1894061fb661d761a1be59c4d37f67ce71a63a0fcf,
https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/control/ai-office-proceeding-response
(https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Acontrol%3Aai-office-proceeding-response&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-14&lang=en, accessed 2026-09-20)

Short form

praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:ai-office-proceeding-response@1.0.0 (sha256 2a14d942)

BibTeX

@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-control-ai-office-proceeding-response-1-0-0,
  author       = {{Praxikon}},
  title        = {Intake and deadline tracking for a demand or an inspection},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {1.0.0},
  number       = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:ai-office-proceeding-response},
  howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.2.0, schema 1.5.0},
  note         = {effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 2a14d942690776abc57ebe1894061fb661d761a1be59c4d37f67ce71a63a0fcf},
  url          = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/control/ai-office-proceeding-response},
  urldate      = {2026-09-20},
  language     = {en}
}

CSL JSON

[
  {
    "id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:ai-office-proceeding-response@1.0.0",
    "type": "dataset",
    "title": "Intake and deadline tracking for a demand or an inspection",
    "container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
    "publisher": "Praxikon",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:ai-office-proceeding-response",
    "URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/control/ai-office-proceeding-response",
    "language": "en",
    "issued": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          14
        ]
      ]
    },
    "accessed": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          9,
          20
        ]
      ]
    },
    "note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.2.0; schema 1.5.0; effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 2a14d942690776abc57ebe1894061fb661d761a1be59c4d37f67ce71a63a0fcf; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Acontrol%3Aai-office-proceeding-response&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-14&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
  }
]

How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms

For agents and integrations

This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.

Open as JSON Open as JSON-LD Read the methodology