Skip to main content
Praxikon
Back to the explorer
ControlUpcomingv1.0.0

Reassessment on a change of intended purpose

The control that ensures a change of intended purpose, a new vendor feature, a new use inside the organisation or a delegated act under Article 7 triggers a fresh assessment of the mapping to a point of Annex III, instead of the first record standing for years while the system or the list moves.

The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map

Address and citation

This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.

Identifier
praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:annex-iii-area-rescan-trigger
Payload hash (sha256)
65d9b6c9abea4895f3b114bde6ccbbf75e8a218f6ddff7347857f09f72f539ce

Citation line

Praxikon, "Reassessment on a change of intended purpose", praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:annex-iii-area-rescan-trigger@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.2.0 (schema 1.5.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-09-06T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 65d9b6c9abea4895f3b114bde6ccbbf75e8a218f6ddff7347857f09f72f539ce
Version
1.0.0
Legal time (effective_at)
27 July 2026
Knowledge time (known_at)
14 August 2026
Closed on
Not closed
Application date
2 December 2027
Topics
high-risk

Review status: Editorially reviewed (14 August 2026). Next check due by 10 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.

What this object links to

Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.

The obligation this hangs off

1 of 1 shown

The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.

  1. Source

    This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Annex III, points 1 to 8

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 7(1) and (3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    No condition or exception recorded on this object.

    Consequence

What this object is about

2 of 2 shown

The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.

  1. Source

    This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Annex III, points 1 to 8

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 7(1) and (3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    No condition or exception recorded on this object.

    Consequence

What points at this object

Where this control comes from

1 of 1 shown

This is what keeps compliance in place over time, periodic or event-driven.

  1. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Annex III, points 1 to 8

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 7(1) and (3)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    • Condition | any ofApplies where the intended purpose of the AI system falls within one of the eight areas listed in Annex III: biometrics, critical infrastructure, education and vocational training, employment and workers management, access to essential private and public services, law enforcement, migration and border control management, or administration of justice and democratic processes.
    • Condition | allClassification follows Article 6(2). For points 1, 6 and 7 the text adds the condition that the use is permitted under relevant Union or national law. We read that condition as meaning that a prohibition under Article 5 comes before the question whether the system is high-risk; that is our reading and not the literal text, which states the condition without naming the order.
    • Condition | any ofThe duty rests on the provider, but the role can shift. Under Article 25(1) a distributor, importer, deployer or third party becomes a provider itself where it puts its name or trademark on the system, makes a substantial modification, or changes the intended purpose such that the system becomes high-risk under Article 6. From that moment it carries the mapping to a point of Annex III itself.
    • ExceptionArticle 6(3) takes a system listed in Annex III back outside high-risk where it does not pose a significant risk of harm to health, safety or fundamental rights, including by not materially influencing the outcome of decision making, and one of four conditions is met: the system performs a narrow procedural task, it improves the result of a previously completed human activity, it detects decision making patterns or deviations from prior patterns without replacing or influencing the previously completed human assessment without proper human review, or it performs a preparatory task to an assessment relevant for the purposes of the use cases listed in Annex III. A system that performs profiling of natural persons is always high-risk.
    • ExceptionThe derogation is not free. Article 6(4) requires a provider who considers that a system referred to in Annex III is not high-risk to document its assessment before the system is placed on the market or put into service, subjects that provider to the registration obligation in Article 49(2), and requires it to provide the documentation to national competent authorities on request.

    As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.

    Relation recorded on: Annex III: the eight areas separately

    Consequence

When this applies

No condition recorded on this object.

When this does not apply

No exception recorded on this object.

Referring to this object

Citation block

Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.

Reference

Praxikon, "Reassessment on a change of intended purpose",
praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:annex-iii-area-rescan-trigger@1.0.0,
dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.2.0 (schema 1.5.0),
effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z,
sha256 65d9b6c9abea4895f3b114bde6ccbbf75e8a218f6ddff7347857f09f72f539ce,
https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/control/annex-iii-area-rescan-trigger
(https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Acontrol%3Aannex-iii-area-rescan-trigger&effective_at=2026-07-27&known_at=2026-08-14&lang=en, accessed 2026-09-20)

Short form

praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:annex-iii-area-rescan-trigger@1.0.0 (sha256 65d9b6c9)

BibTeX

@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-control-annex-iii-area-rescan-trigger-1-0-0,
  author       = {{Praxikon}},
  title        = {Reassessment on a change of intended purpose},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {1.0.0},
  number       = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:annex-iii-area-rescan-trigger},
  howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.2.0, schema 1.5.0},
  note         = {effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 65d9b6c9abea4895f3b114bde6ccbbf75e8a218f6ddff7347857f09f72f539ce},
  url          = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/control/annex-iii-area-rescan-trigger},
  urldate      = {2026-09-20},
  language     = {en}
}

CSL JSON

[
  {
    "id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:annex-iii-area-rescan-trigger@1.0.0",
    "type": "dataset",
    "title": "Reassessment on a change of intended purpose",
    "container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
    "publisher": "Praxikon",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:annex-iii-area-rescan-trigger",
    "URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/control/annex-iii-area-rescan-trigger",
    "language": "en",
    "issued": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          14
        ]
      ]
    },
    "accessed": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          9,
          20
        ]
      ]
    },
    "note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.2.0; schema 1.5.0; effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 65d9b6c9abea4895f3b114bde6ccbbf75e8a218f6ddff7347857f09f72f539ce; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Acontrol%3Aannex-iii-area-rescan-trigger&effective_at=2026-07-27&known_at=2026-08-14&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
  }
]

How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms

For agents and integrations

This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.

Open as JSONOpen as JSON-LDRead the methodology