Skip to main content
Praxikon
Back to the explorer
DefinitionIn forcev1.0.0

Conformity assessment

The process of demonstrating that a high-risk AI system meets the requirements of Chapter III, Section 2. It is the evidence step for high-risk systems, not for all AI.

The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map

Address and citation

This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.

Identifier
praxikon:eu:ai-act:definition:definitie-conformiteitsbeoordeling
Payload hash (sha256)
a4e48a70b8962f16e951ff6bcfbce1b42d2f5ae1e6be57c5e76ab98f73fa004b

Citation line

Praxikon, "Conformity assessment", praxikon:eu:ai-act:definition:definitie-conformiteitsbeoordeling@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 a4e48a70b8962f16e951ff6bcfbce1b42d2f5ae1e6be57c5e76ab98f73fa004b
Version
1.0.0
Legal time (effective_at)
8 August 2026
Knowledge time (known_at)
8 August 2026
Closed on
Not closed
Application date
1 August 2024
Topics
definitions

Review status: Placed against the official source (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.

What this object links to

Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.

What this object is about

1 of 1 shown

The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.

  1. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 3(20)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    No condition or exception recorded on this object.

    Consequence

What this object states

Official fact

Attributable to a named primary source, with a locator. Where they differ, the official source prevails.

  • Article 3(20) defines conformity assessment as the process of demonstrating whether the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2 relating to a high-risk AI system have been fulfilled.

Our interpretation

Our own reading. It can change without the law changing, and it is not the position of a supervisory authority.

  • Two misconceptions dominate. The first is that every AI application needs a conformity assessment: the definition expressly limits it to high-risk systems. The second is that conformity assessment equals an external audit: for most Annex III systems the internal control route of Article 43 suffices, with the provider itself demonstrating that the requirements are met. If you conclude you are not high-risk, substantiate that conclusion in writing rather than assuming it silently. The obligations apply to Annex III systems from 2 December 2027 and to Annex I products from 2 August 2028.

Recommended step

A practical step we consider appropriate. Not an obligation following from the Regulation.

  • Record your risk classification in writing for each AI system, including the reasoning, even where the outcome is that it is not high-risk. Where it is high-risk, also record which route you follow, internal control or involvement of a notified body, and which evidence per requirement of Chapter III, Section 2 sits in the technical documentation.

When this applies

No condition recorded on this object.

When this does not apply

No exception recorded on this object.

Referring to this object

Citation block

Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.

Reference

Praxikon, "Conformity assessment",
praxikon:eu:ai-act:definition:definitie-conformiteitsbeoordeling@1.0.0,
dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0),
effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z,
sha256 a4e48a70b8962f16e951ff6bcfbce1b42d2f5ae1e6be57c5e76ab98f73fa004b,
https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/definition/definitie-conformiteitsbeoordeling
(https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Adefinition%3Adefinitie-conformiteitsbeoordeling&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-23)

Short form

praxikon:eu:ai-act:definition:definitie-conformiteitsbeoordeling@1.0.0 (sha256 a4e48a70)

BibTeX

@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-definition-definitie-conformiteitsbeoordeling-1-0-0,
  author       = {{Praxikon}},
  title        = {Conformity assessment},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {1.0.0},
  number       = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:definition:definitie-conformiteitsbeoordeling},
  howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
  note         = {effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 a4e48a70b8962f16e951ff6bcfbce1b42d2f5ae1e6be57c5e76ab98f73fa004b},
  url          = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/definition/definitie-conformiteitsbeoordeling},
  urldate      = {2026-08-23},
  language     = {en}
}

CSL JSON

[
  {
    "id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:definition:definitie-conformiteitsbeoordeling@1.0.0",
    "type": "dataset",
    "title": "Conformity assessment",
    "container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
    "publisher": "Praxikon",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:definition:definitie-conformiteitsbeoordeling",
    "URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/definition/definitie-conformiteitsbeoordeling",
    "language": "en",
    "issued": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          8
        ]
      ]
    },
    "accessed": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          23
        ]
      ]
    },
    "note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 a4e48a70b8962f16e951ff6bcfbce1b42d2f5ae1e6be57c5e76ab98f73fa004b; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Adefinition%3Adefinitie-conformiteitsbeoordeling&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
  }
]

How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms

For agents and integrations

This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.