EvidenceUpcomingv1.0.0

File of reports and assessments with the AI Office

Per serious incident: when you established it, when and where you reported it, which system version it concerned and how you met the Article 73 deadlines. Per third-party conformity assessment: that the Office was responsible, which notified body acted on behalf of the Commission, which fees you paid directly and when the assessment was completed.

The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map

Address and citation

This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.

Identifier: praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:ai-office-incident-and-assessment-record
Payload hash (sha256): aa513b2e5543e349e9ed73bff5fdb13116e863efd089a15b5afee3903f7a76f9

Citation line

Praxikon, "File of reports and assessments with the AI Office", praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:ai-office-incident-and-assessment-record@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.2.0 (schema 1.5.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-09-06T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 aa513b2e5543e349e9ed73bff5fdb13116e863efd089a15b5afee3903f7a76f9

Version: 1.0.0
Legal time (effective_at): 8 August 2026
Knowledge time (known_at): 14 August 2026
Closed on: Not closed
Application date: 2 December 2027
Topics: enforcement, evidence

Review status: Editorially reviewed (14 August 2026). Next check due by 10 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.

What this object links to

Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.

The obligation this hangs off

1 of 1 shown

The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.

Source
This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.
- Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
  Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (31), Article 75(1a) and (1e)
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
  Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
- ObligationArticle 75(1a) and (1e): reporting to and assessment by the AI Office
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-75-ai-office-high-risk-duties

What this object is about

1 of 1 shown

The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.

Source
This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.
- Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
  Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (31), Article 75(1a) and (1e)
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
  Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
- ActorProvider of an AI system
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider

What points at this object

Where this evidence comes from

1 of 1 shown

This is what has to be in the file to show that the action was carried out.

Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
- Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
  Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (31), Article 75(1a) and (1e)
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
  Open official source
Via
- Condition | allApplies to providers of AI systems that fall under the competence of the AI Office pursuant to Article 75(1) and that are classified as high-risk. The replaced paragraph 1 carries two independent routes, and the four carve-outs at (i) to (iv) sit inside point (a) alone. Along point (a) Annex I systems fall outside the competence, as do point 2 of Annex III and point 8 as regards the administration of justice; point 8(b), on influencing elections and referenda, is not carved out. Point (b) is a route of its own: a system that constitutes, or is integrated into, a designated very large online platform or very large online search engine falls under the competence of the AI Office even where one of the carve-outs in point (a) applies. Anyone testing point (a) alone places such a system outside this obligation wrongly. Those duties start to apply when Chapter III, Sections 1 to 3, becomes applicable, and that date depends on the route: 2 December 2027 for the route of Article 6(2) and Annex III, and 2 August 2028 for the route of Article 6(1) and Annex I, which point (b) can bring into view. The deadline_at field carries the earlier of the two.
Relation recorded on: Article 75(1a) and (1e): reporting to and assessment by the AI Office
Consequence
- ObligationArticle 75(1a) and (1e): reporting to and assessment by the AI Office
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-75-ai-office-high-risk-duties

What this object states

Our interpretation

Our own reading. It can change without the law changing, and it is not the position of a supervisory authority.

The date on this object is derived and not stated by Article 75 itself. Point (c) of the third paragraph of Article 113 gives two dates for the moment Chapter III, Sections 1 to 3, becomes applicable: 2 December 2027 through Article 6(2) and Annex III, and 2 August 2028 through Article 6(1) and Annex I. This object carries the earlier of the two. Which date applies to your system depends on the route by which it is high-risk, and that choice is not made here.
- Locator: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, Article 1, point (40)(b), replacing Article 113, third paragraph, point (c)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744Open official source

When this applies

No condition recorded on this object.

When this does not apply

No exception recorded on this object.

Referring to this object

Citation block

Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.

Reference

Praxikon, "File of reports and assessments with the AI Office",
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:ai-office-incident-and-assessment-record@1.0.0,
dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.2.0 (schema 1.5.0),
effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z,
sha256 aa513b2e5543e349e9ed73bff5fdb13116e863efd089a15b5afee3903f7a76f9,
https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/evidence/ai-office-incident-and-assessment-record
(https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aevidence%3Aai-office-incident-and-assessment-record&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-14&lang=en, accessed 2026-09-20)

Short form

praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:ai-office-incident-and-assessment-record@1.0.0 (sha256 aa513b2e)

BibTeX

@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-evidence-ai-office-incident-and-assessment-record-1-0-0,
  author       = {{Praxikon}},
  title        = {File of reports and assessments with the AI Office},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {1.0.0},
  number       = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:ai-office-incident-and-assessment-record},
  howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.2.0, schema 1.5.0},
  note         = {effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 aa513b2e5543e349e9ed73bff5fdb13116e863efd089a15b5afee3903f7a76f9},
  url          = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/evidence/ai-office-incident-and-assessment-record},
  urldate      = {2026-09-20},
  language     = {en}
}

CSL JSON

[
  {
    "id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:ai-office-incident-and-assessment-record@1.0.0",
    "type": "dataset",
    "title": "File of reports and assessments with the AI Office",
    "container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
    "publisher": "Praxikon",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:ai-office-incident-and-assessment-record",
    "URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/evidence/ai-office-incident-and-assessment-record",
    "language": "en",
    "issued": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          14
        ]
      ]
    },
    "accessed": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          9,
          20
        ]
      ]
    },
    "note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.2.0; schema 1.5.0; effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 aa513b2e5543e349e9ed73bff5fdb13116e863efd089a15b5afee3903f7a76f9; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aevidence%3Aai-office-incident-and-assessment-record&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-14&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
  }
]

How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms

For agents and integrations

This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.

Open as JSON Open as JSON-LD Read the methodology