Provider dossier per high-risk AI system
One dossier per system holding the documentation, the logs, the EU declaration of conformity and the registration record, in the version that applied at the moment of placing on the market.
The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map
Address and citation
This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.
- Identifier
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-16-provider-dossier- Payload hash (sha256)
1f7243b6da197bce688b7e80cc23b9d60e2468187450dce916807519f05131db
Citation line
Praxikon, "Provider dossier per high-risk AI system", praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-16-provider-dossier@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 1f7243b6da197bce688b7e80cc23b9d60e2468187450dce916807519f05131db- Version
- 1.0.0
- Legal time (effective_at)
- 8 August 2026
- Knowledge time (known_at)
- 8 August 2026
- Closed on
- Not closed
- Application date
- 2 December 2027
- Topics
- high-risk-requirements
Review status: Editorially reviewed (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.
What this object links to
Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.
The obligation this hangs off
1 of 1 shown
The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.
Source
This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 16(a)-(l)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official source
Via
- Condition | allTo be maintained per individual high-risk AI system, not per product line or per supplier.
Consequence
ObligationArticle 16: the twelve duties of a provider of a high-risk AI system
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-16-provider-obligations
What this object is about
1 of 1 shown
The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.
Source
This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 16(a)-(l)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official source
Via
- Condition | allTo be maintained per individual high-risk AI system, not per product line or per supplier.
Consequence
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider
What points at this object
Where this evidence comes from
1 of 1 shown
This is what has to be in the file to show that the action was carried out.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 16(a)-(l)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official source
Via
- Condition | allApplies to providers of high-risk AI systems. For the standalone Annex III route (Article 6(2)) the date is 2 December 2027. For systems embedded as a safety component in products covered by the Annex I harmonisation legislation (Article 6(1)) the date is 2 August 2028.
- ExceptionA provider that considers an Annex III system not to be high-risk must document that assessment before placing it on the market and remains subject to the registration obligation of Article 49(2) (Article 6(4)). Where an AI system referred to in Annex III performs profiling of natural persons it is always considered high-risk (Article 6(3), final subparagraph).
As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.
Relation recorded on: Article 16: the twelve duties of a provider of a high-risk AI system
Consequence
ObligationArticle 16: the twelve duties of a provider of a high-risk AI system
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-16-provider-obligations
When this applies
- 1To be maintained per individual high-risk AI system, not per product line or per supplier.
When this does not apply
No exception recorded on this object.
Referring to this object
Citation block
Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.
Reference
Praxikon, "Provider dossier per high-risk AI system", praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-16-provider-dossier@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 1f7243b6da197bce688b7e80cc23b9d60e2468187450dce916807519f05131db, https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/evidence/article-16-provider-dossier (https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aevidence%3Aarticle-16-provider-dossier&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-25)
Short form
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-16-provider-dossier@1.0.0 (sha256 1f7243b6)
BibTeX
@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-evidence-article-16-provider-dossier-1-0-0,
author = {{Praxikon}},
title = {Provider dossier per high-risk AI system},
year = {2026},
version = {1.0.0},
number = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-16-provider-dossier},
howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
note = {effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 1f7243b6da197bce688b7e80cc23b9d60e2468187450dce916807519f05131db},
url = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/evidence/article-16-provider-dossier},
urldate = {2026-08-25},
language = {en}
}CSL JSON
[
{
"id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-16-provider-dossier@1.0.0",
"type": "dataset",
"title": "Provider dossier per high-risk AI system",
"container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
"publisher": "Praxikon",
"version": "1.0.0",
"number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-16-provider-dossier",
"URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/evidence/article-16-provider-dossier",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
8
]
]
},
"accessed": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
25
]
]
},
"note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 1f7243b6da197bce688b7e80cc23b9d60e2468187450dce916807519f05131db; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aevidence%3Aarticle-16-provider-dossier&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
}
]How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms
For agents and integrations
This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.