Skip to main content
Praxikon
Back to the explorer
ExampleEditorialv1.0.0

AI chat in recruitment and selection: what the applicant must be told

A recruiter deploys an AI chat that puts candidates through a first screening conversation after they respond to a job posting, and adds their answers to their CV. The chat introduces itself with a first name and writes in a casual conversational tone. The question is whether these applicants reasonably realise that they are talking to an AI system.

The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map

Address and citation

This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.

Identifier
praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-artikel-50-ai-chat-sollicitanten
Payload hash (sha256)
bbf1f3c5c8847982509ad7a4d086b513a5e0742db0e4415b178f1cdd5cfe1bc2

Citation line

Praxikon, "AI chat in recruitment and selection: what the applicant must be told", praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-artikel-50-ai-chat-sollicitanten@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 bbf1f3c5c8847982509ad7a4d086b513a5e0742db0e4415b178f1cdd5cfe1bc2
Version
1.0.0
Legal time (effective_at)
1 August 2024
Knowledge time (known_at)
8 August 2026
Closed on
Not closed
Topics
examples

Review status: Placed against the official source (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.

What this object links to

Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.

The obligation this hangs off

1 of 1 shown

The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.

  1. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 50(1) and (5)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    No condition or exception recorded on this object.

    Consequence

What this object is about

2 of 2 shown

The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.

  1. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

      Locator: Article 50(1) and (5)

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689

      Open official source

    Via

    No condition or exception recorded on this object.

    Consequence

What this object states

Official fact

Attributable to a named primary source, with a locator. Where they differ, the official source prevails.

  • Article 50(1) requires providers to ensure that AI systems intended to interact directly with natural persons are designed and developed in such a way that the natural persons concerned are informed that they are interacting with an AI system, unless this is obvious from the point of view of a natural person who is reasonably well-informed, observant and circumspect, taking into account the circumstances and the context of use. Article 50(5) provides that this information must be given to the natural persons concerned in a clear and distinguishable manner at the latest at the time of the first interaction, and must conform to the applicable accessibility requirements.

Our interpretation

Our own reading. It can change without the law changing, and it is not the position of a supervisory authority.

  • We read the obviousness test as a question about the audience the system actually meets, and in recruitment and selection that audience is not a trained professional group but a broad set of applicants under pressure who do not yet know the organisation. A human first name and a casual tone push that assessment the wrong way in our view, however well they convert. If you buy the chat rather than build it, Article 50(1) is by its wording addressed to the provider, while you are the one choosing the persona and the entry point; whether putting your own name on such a chat moves you into the provider role is a question Article 50 does not answer. So make the disclosure in the first message a procurement requirement and verify at delivery that it is genuinely there.

When this applies

No condition recorded on this object.

When this does not apply

No exception recorded on this object.

Referring to this object

Citation block

Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.

Reference

Praxikon, "AI chat in recruitment and selection: what the applicant must be told",
praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-artikel-50-ai-chat-sollicitanten@1.0.0,
dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0),
effective_at 2024-08-01T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z,
sha256 bbf1f3c5c8847982509ad7a4d086b513a5e0742db0e4415b178f1cdd5cfe1bc2,
https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-artikel-50-ai-chat-sollicitanten
(https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aexample%3Aexample-artikel-50-ai-chat-sollicitanten&effective_at=2024-08-01&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-25)

Short form

praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-artikel-50-ai-chat-sollicitanten@1.0.0 (sha256 bbf1f3c5)

BibTeX

@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-example-example-artikel-50-ai-chat-sollicitanten-1-0-0,
  author       = {{Praxikon}},
  title        = {AI chat in recruitment and selection: what the applicant must be told},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {1.0.0},
  number       = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-artikel-50-ai-chat-sollicitanten},
  howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
  note         = {effective_at 2024-08-01T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 bbf1f3c5c8847982509ad7a4d086b513a5e0742db0e4415b178f1cdd5cfe1bc2},
  url          = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-artikel-50-ai-chat-sollicitanten},
  urldate      = {2026-08-25},
  language     = {en}
}

CSL JSON

[
  {
    "id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-artikel-50-ai-chat-sollicitanten@1.0.0",
    "type": "dataset",
    "title": "AI chat in recruitment and selection: what the applicant must be told",
    "container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
    "publisher": "Praxikon",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-artikel-50-ai-chat-sollicitanten",
    "URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-artikel-50-ai-chat-sollicitanten",
    "language": "en",
    "issued": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          8
        ]
      ]
    },
    "accessed": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          25
        ]
      ]
    },
    "note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2024-08-01T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 bbf1f3c5c8847982509ad7a4d086b513a5e0742db0e4415b178f1cdd5cfe1bc2; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aexample%3Aexample-artikel-50-ai-chat-sollicitanten&effective_at=2024-08-01&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
  }
]

How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms

For agents and integrations

This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.