ExampleGuidancev1.0.0

Camera at the entrance: access control versus biometric categorisation

An organisation admits staff through facial recognition at its access control gate and additionally runs a camera in the visitor area that sorts faces into age groups. Both applications run on the same biometric infrastructure and the same images. The question is which of the two requires the people involved to be actively informed.

The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map

Address and citation

This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.

Identifier: praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-artikel-50-camera-toegangscontrole-categorisatie
Payload hash (sha256): 160b7164fde8818b8b2563f5a2e755e5669228072717a49f653bf2ca4c75bee6

Citation line

Praxikon, "Camera at the entrance: access control versus biometric categorisation", praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-artikel-50-camera-toegangscontrole-categorisatie@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 160b7164fde8818b8b2563f5a2e755e5669228072717a49f653bf2ca4c75bee6

Version: 1.0.0
Legal time (effective_at): 20 July 2026
Knowledge time (known_at): 8 August 2026
Closed on: Not closed
Topics: examples

Review status: Placed against the official source (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.

What this object links to

Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.

The obligation this hangs off

1 of 1 shown

The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.

Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
- Guidelines on Article 50
  Locator: Commission Guidelines C(2026) 5054 final, 20.7.2026, point (30) and points (104) to (108)
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-article-50-guidelines
  Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
- ObligationArticle 50: transparency
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-50-transparency

What this object is about

2 of 2 shown

The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.

Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
- Guidelines on Article 50
  Locator: Commission Guidelines C(2026) 5054 final, 20.7.2026, point (30) and points (104) to (108)
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-article-50-guidelines
  Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
- ActorDeployer
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:deployer
- ActorProvider of an AI system
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider

What this object states

Official fact

Attributable to a named primary source, with a locator. Where they differ, the official source prevails.

The Commission guidelines of 20 July 2026 count automated facial-recognition access controls among the systems that merely collect data passively and are not capable of an exchange with natural persons, and therefore do not interact within the meaning of Article 50(1). For Article 50(3) they state that, unless the use is prohibited under Article 5(1)(g), the information duty applies to any biometric categorisation system, including outside the high-risk scope, and they give classification by age or gender on the basis of biometric data as an example. Article 50(3) itself carries a further exception for systems permitted by law to detect, prevent or investigate criminal offences. As a way of informing people the guidelines describe a visible notice at each possible entrance to an exhibition room stating that facial images are captured to assign visitors to an age group, provided at the latest at the moment of first exposure.
- Locator: Commission Guidelines C(2026) 5054 final, 20.7.2026, point (30) and points (104) to (108)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-article-50-guidelinesOpen official source

Our interpretation

Our own reading. It can change without the law changing, and it is not the position of a supervisory authority.

Our reading is that you should map this per processing purpose rather than per camera: the same lens that stays outside Article 50(1) at the access control gate moves inside Article 50(3) as soon as those images place people in a category. Record for each setup what happens to the capture and who the deployer is, because that decides whether a notice belongs at the entrance. The guidelines prescribe no fixed form, but they do fix the moment: the notice has to be there before someone walks into frame, and a line in the privacy statement rarely makes that moment, in our reading.
- Locator: Commission Guidelines C(2026) 5054 final, 20.7.2026, point (30) and points (104) to (108)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-article-50-guidelinesOpen official source

When this applies

No condition recorded on this object.

When this does not apply

No exception recorded on this object.

Referring to this object

Citation block

Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.

Reference

Praxikon, "Camera at the entrance: access control versus biometric categorisation",
praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-artikel-50-camera-toegangscontrole-categorisatie@1.0.0,
dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0),
effective_at 2026-07-20T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z,
sha256 160b7164fde8818b8b2563f5a2e755e5669228072717a49f653bf2ca4c75bee6,
https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-artikel-50-camera-toegangscontrole-categorisatie
(https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aexample%3Aexample-artikel-50-camera-toegangscontrole-categorisatie&effective_at=2026-07-20&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-25)

Short form

praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-artikel-50-camera-toegangscontrole-categorisatie@1.0.0 (sha256 160b7164)

BibTeX

@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-example-example-artikel-50-camera-toegangscontrole-categorisatie-1-0-0,
  author       = {{Praxikon}},
  title        = {Camera at the entrance: access control versus biometric categorisation},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {1.0.0},
  number       = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-artikel-50-camera-toegangscontrole-categorisatie},
  howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
  note         = {effective_at 2026-07-20T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 160b7164fde8818b8b2563f5a2e755e5669228072717a49f653bf2ca4c75bee6},
  url          = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-artikel-50-camera-toegangscontrole-categorisatie},
  urldate      = {2026-08-25},
  language     = {en}
}

CSL JSON

[
  {
    "id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-artikel-50-camera-toegangscontrole-categorisatie@1.0.0",
    "type": "dataset",
    "title": "Camera at the entrance: access control versus biometric categorisation",
    "container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
    "publisher": "Praxikon",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-artikel-50-camera-toegangscontrole-categorisatie",
    "URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-artikel-50-camera-toegangscontrole-categorisatie",
    "language": "en",
    "issued": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          8
        ]
      ]
    },
    "accessed": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          25
        ]
      ]
    },
    "note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-07-20T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 160b7164fde8818b8b2563f5a2e755e5669228072717a49f653bf2ca4c75bee6; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aexample%3Aexample-artikel-50-camera-toegangscontrole-categorisatie&effective_at=2026-07-20&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
  }
]

How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms

For agents and integrations

This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.

Open as JSON Open as JSON-LD Read the methodology