Skip to main content
Praxikon
Back to the explorer
ExampleGuidancev1.0.0

Retrospective audit of hiring patterns on anonymised data

A system audits completed hiring decisions by analysing anonymised recruitment data, including CV scores, interview notes and hiring outcomes, using statistical modelling to detect potential bias or inconsistencies. It plays no role in ongoing recruitment and does not assess identified or identifiable recruiters or applicants.

The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map

Address and citation

This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.

Identifier
praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-hiring-pattern-audit
Payload hash (sha256)
020cb94fe6b56f5b6623461c6390b28248a2ae45c0ff42d6819554c16f799f02

Citation line

Praxikon, "Retrospective audit of hiring patterns on anonymised data", praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-hiring-pattern-audit@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 020cb94fe6b56f5b6623461c6390b28248a2ae45c0ff42d6819554c16f799f02
Version
1.0.0
Legal time (effective_at)
8 August 2026
Knowledge time (known_at)
8 August 2026
Closed on
Not closed
Topics
examples

Review status: Placed against the official source (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.

What this object links to

Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.

The obligation this hangs off

1 of 1 shown

The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.

  1. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems

      Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex III

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines

      Open official source

    Via

    No condition or exception recorded on this object.

    Consequence

What this object is about

2 of 2 shown

The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.

  1. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems

      Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex III

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines

      Open official source

    Via

    No condition or exception recorded on this object.

    Consequence

What this object states

Official fact

Attributable to a named primary source, with a locator. Where they differ, the official source prevails.

  • The Commission draft guidelines of 19 May 2026 address this case when determining whether an application falls under Annex III. The document is a consultation version: non-binding and not yet final.

    • Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex IIIpraxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source

Our interpretation

Our own reading. It can change without the law changing, and it is not the position of a supervisory authority.

  • Anonymise the data and keep the analysis entirely retrospective, and you can examine hiring patterns for bias without the system being treated as high-risk.

    • Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex IIIpraxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source

When this applies

No condition recorded on this object.

When this does not apply

No exception recorded on this object.

Referring to this object

Citation block

Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.

Reference

Praxikon, "Retrospective audit of hiring patterns on anonymised data",
praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-hiring-pattern-audit@1.0.0,
dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0),
effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z,
sha256 020cb94fe6b56f5b6623461c6390b28248a2ae45c0ff42d6819554c16f799f02,
https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-high-risk-hiring-pattern-audit
(https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aexample%3Aexample-high-risk-hiring-pattern-audit&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-25)

Short form

praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-hiring-pattern-audit@1.0.0 (sha256 020cb94f)

BibTeX

@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-example-example-high-risk-hiring-pattern-audit-1-0-0,
  author       = {{Praxikon}},
  title        = {Retrospective audit of hiring patterns on anonymised data},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {1.0.0},
  number       = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-hiring-pattern-audit},
  howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
  note         = {effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 020cb94fe6b56f5b6623461c6390b28248a2ae45c0ff42d6819554c16f799f02},
  url          = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-high-risk-hiring-pattern-audit},
  urldate      = {2026-08-25},
  language     = {en}
}

CSL JSON

[
  {
    "id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-hiring-pattern-audit@1.0.0",
    "type": "dataset",
    "title": "Retrospective audit of hiring patterns on anonymised data",
    "container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
    "publisher": "Praxikon",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-hiring-pattern-audit",
    "URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-high-risk-hiring-pattern-audit",
    "language": "en",
    "issued": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          8
        ]
      ]
    },
    "accessed": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          25
        ]
      ]
    },
    "note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 020cb94fe6b56f5b6623461c6390b28248a2ae45c0ff42d6819554c16f799f02; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aexample%3Aexample-high-risk-hiring-pattern-audit&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
  }
]

How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms

For agents and integrations

This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.