ExampleGuidancev1.0.0

Rail: AI system in a train monitoring speed limits

An AI system in a train is intended to monitor speed limits and to prevent collisions and derailments.

The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map

Address and citation

This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.

Identifier: praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-rail-speed-monitoring-collision-prevention
Payload hash (sha256): 5e311d8dad3d2643f79e306bfa20f9a3c0fbe5968780b717277acea82c296bb8

Citation line

Praxikon, "Rail: AI system in a train monitoring speed limits", praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-rail-speed-monitoring-collision-prevention@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 5e311d8dad3d2643f79e306bfa20f9a3c0fbe5968780b717277acea82c296bb8

Version: 1.0.0
Legal time (effective_at): 8 August 2026
Knowledge time (known_at): 8 August 2026
Closed on: Not closed
Topics: examples

Review status: Placed against the official source (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.

What this object links to

Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.

The obligation this hangs off

1 of 1 shown

The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.

Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
- Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems
  Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex I and product legislation
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines
  Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
- ObligationArticles 43-49: conformity assessment, CE and registration
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:conformity-ce-registration

What this object is about

1 of 1 shown

The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.

Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
- Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems
  Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex I and product legislation
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines
  Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
- ActorProvider of an AI system
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider

What this object states

Official fact

Attributable to a named primary source, with a locator. Where they differ, the official source prevails.

The Commission draft guidelines of 19 May 2026 address this case when determining whether AI as a safety component falls under the Annex I product legislation. The document is a consultation version: non-binding and not yet final.
- Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex I and product legislationpraxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source

Our interpretation

Our own reading. It can change without the law changing, and it is not the position of a supervisory authority.

If you work in a sector with its own safety regime, note that only the definition in Article 3(14) of the AI Act counts, not the sectoral notion of safety component.
- Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex I and product legislationpraxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source

When this applies

No condition recorded on this object.

When this does not apply

No exception recorded on this object.

Referring to this object

Citation block

Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.

Reference

Praxikon, "Rail: AI system in a train monitoring speed limits",
praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-rail-speed-monitoring-collision-prevention@1.0.0,
dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0),
effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z,
sha256 5e311d8dad3d2643f79e306bfa20f9a3c0fbe5968780b717277acea82c296bb8,
https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-high-risk-rail-speed-monitoring-collision-prevention
(https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aexample%3Aexample-high-risk-rail-speed-monitoring-collision-prevention&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-25)

Short form

praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-rail-speed-monitoring-collision-prevention@1.0.0 (sha256 5e311d8d)

BibTeX

@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-example-example-high-risk-rail-speed-monitoring-collision-prevention-1-0-0,
  author       = {{Praxikon}},
  title        = {Rail: AI system in a train monitoring speed limits},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {1.0.0},
  number       = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-rail-speed-monitoring-collision-prevention},
  howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
  note         = {effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 5e311d8dad3d2643f79e306bfa20f9a3c0fbe5968780b717277acea82c296bb8},
  url          = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-high-risk-rail-speed-monitoring-collision-prevention},
  urldate      = {2026-08-25},
  language     = {en}
}

CSL JSON

[
  {
    "id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-rail-speed-monitoring-collision-prevention@1.0.0",
    "type": "dataset",
    "title": "Rail: AI system in a train monitoring speed limits",
    "container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
    "publisher": "Praxikon",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-rail-speed-monitoring-collision-prevention",
    "URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-high-risk-rail-speed-monitoring-collision-prevention",
    "language": "en",
    "issued": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          8
        ]
      ]
    },
    "accessed": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          25
        ]
      ]
    },
    "note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 5e311d8dad3d2643f79e306bfa20f9a3c0fbe5968780b717277acea82c296bb8; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aexample%3Aexample-high-risk-rail-speed-monitoring-collision-prevention&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
  }
]

How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms

For agents and integrations

This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.

Open as JSON Open as JSON-LD Read the methodology