Deviation detection in recruitment that assesses the recruiters themselves
A system identifies deviations from previous recruitment decision-making patterns before recruitment is completed, to detect inconsistencies with corporate recruitment policy, while evaluating the personal characteristics of the recruiters conducting the interviews.
The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map
Address and citation
This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.
- Identifier
praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-recruiter-deviation-profiling- Payload hash (sha256)
083a9a0b6a7fa69c7a835a451cd1c2308d0825c729f63acdf802153e07b842b1
Citation line
Praxikon, "Deviation detection in recruitment that assesses the recruiters themselves", praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-recruiter-deviation-profiling@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 083a9a0b6a7fa69c7a835a451cd1c2308d0825c729f63acdf802153e07b842b1- Version
- 1.0.0
- Legal time (effective_at)
- 8 August 2026
- Knowledge time (known_at)
- 8 August 2026
- Closed on
- Not closed
- Topics
- examples
Review status: Placed against the official source (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.
What this object links to
Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.
The obligation this hangs off
1 of 1 shown
The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems
Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex III
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
ObligationAnnex III: high-risk AI
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:annex-iii-high-risk
What this object is about
2 of 2 shown
The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems
Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex III
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
ActorDeployer
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:deployer
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider
What this object states
Official fact
Attributable to a named primary source, with a locator. Where they differ, the official source prevails.
The Commission draft guidelines of 19 May 2026 address this case when determining whether an application falls under Annex III. The document is a consultation version: non-binding and not yet final.
- Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex IIIpraxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source
Our interpretation
Our own reading. It can change without the law changing, and it is not the position of a supervisory authority.
To keep the exemption, aim the deviation analysis solely at the decisions themselves rather than at the people who made them, and run it only after recruitment has been completed.
- Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification, 19 May 2026, annex on Annex IIIpraxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source
When this applies
No condition recorded on this object.
When this does not apply
No exception recorded on this object.
Referring to this object
Citation block
Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.
Reference
Praxikon, "Deviation detection in recruitment that assesses the recruiters themselves", praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-recruiter-deviation-profiling@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 083a9a0b6a7fa69c7a835a451cd1c2308d0825c729f63acdf802153e07b842b1, https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-high-risk-recruiter-deviation-profiling (https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aexample%3Aexample-high-risk-recruiter-deviation-profiling&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-25)
Short form
praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-recruiter-deviation-profiling@1.0.0 (sha256 083a9a0b)
BibTeX
@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-example-example-high-risk-recruiter-deviation-profiling-1-0-0,
author = {{Praxikon}},
title = {Deviation detection in recruitment that assesses the recruiters themselves},
year = {2026},
version = {1.0.0},
number = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-recruiter-deviation-profiling},
howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
note = {effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 083a9a0b6a7fa69c7a835a451cd1c2308d0825c729f63acdf802153e07b842b1},
url = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-high-risk-recruiter-deviation-profiling},
urldate = {2026-08-25},
language = {en}
}CSL JSON
[
{
"id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-recruiter-deviation-profiling@1.0.0",
"type": "dataset",
"title": "Deviation detection in recruitment that assesses the recruiters themselves",
"container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
"publisher": "Praxikon",
"version": "1.0.0",
"number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-high-risk-recruiter-deviation-profiling",
"URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-high-risk-recruiter-deviation-profiling",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
8
]
]
},
"accessed": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
25
]
]
},
"note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 083a9a0b6a7fa69c7a835a451cd1c2308d0825c729f63acdf802153e07b842b1; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aexample%3Aexample-high-risk-recruiter-deviation-profiling&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
}
]How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms
For agents and integrations
This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.