Proctoring during exams: which real-world data the institution reports back
A vendor offers proctoring software that flags possible cheating during exams. Several universities of applied sciences use the system, each with its own assessment formats and its own student populations. The vendor wants to know which real-world data it must keep collecting after roll-out, and from whom.
The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map
Address and citation
This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.
- Identifier
praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-post-market-monitoring-proctoring-tentamens- Payload hash (sha256)
683c18d4fac97ff4db4363416589f34e9615625ed4323784e0b292b8d25ad231
Citation line
Praxikon, "Proctoring during exams: which real-world data the institution reports back", praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-post-market-monitoring-proctoring-tentamens@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 683c18d4fac97ff4db4363416589f34e9615625ed4323784e0b292b8d25ad231- Version
- 1.0.0
- Legal time (effective_at)
- 1 August 2024
- Knowledge time (known_at)
- 8 August 2026
- Closed on
- Not closed
- Topics
- examples
Review status: Placed against the official source (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.
What this object links to
Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.
The obligation this hangs off
1 of 1 shown
The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 72(1)-(3)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
ObligationArticle 72: post-market monitoring
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-72-post-market-monitoring
What this object is about
2 of 2 shown
The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 72(1)-(3)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
ActorDeployer
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:deployer
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider
What this object states
Official fact
Attributable to a named primary source, with a locator. Where they differ, the official source prevails.
Article 72(1) requires providers to establish and document a post-market monitoring system, proportionate to the nature of the AI technologies and the risks of the system. Article 72(2) provides that this system actively and systematically collects, documents and analyses relevant data which may be provided by deployers or collected through other sources on the performance of high-risk AI systems throughout their lifetime, and which allow the provider to evaluate the continuous compliance of those systems with the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2. Where relevant, monitoring includes an analysis of the interaction with other AI systems. Article 72(3) provides that the system is based on a plan forming part of the technical documentation referred to in Annex IV.
- Locator: Article 72(1)-(3)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689Open official source
Our interpretation
Our own reading. It can change without the law changing, and it is not the position of a supervisory authority.
The duty sits with the provider, but the useful signals arise in education itself: unfounded suspicions, student complaints, differences between programmes and assessment formats. Our reading is that paragraph 2 allows deployers to supply that data while leaving the duty to collect and analyse it with the provider. What the article does not settle is the route by which the data reaches you, or whether the institutions are bound to supply it; that is something you have to arrange with them and cannot read out of Article 72. We would therefore fix that route before the system goes live, and would also set out in the plan how you break performance down by assessment format and by group, since an average across all schools hides precisely the pattern you are looking for.
- Locator: Article 72(1)-(3)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689Open official source
When this applies
No condition recorded on this object.
When this does not apply
No exception recorded on this object.
Referring to this object
Citation block
Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.
Reference
Praxikon, "Proctoring during exams: which real-world data the institution reports back", praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-post-market-monitoring-proctoring-tentamens@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2024-08-01T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 683c18d4fac97ff4db4363416589f34e9615625ed4323784e0b292b8d25ad231, https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-post-market-monitoring-proctoring-tentamens (https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aexample%3Aexample-post-market-monitoring-proctoring-tentamens&effective_at=2024-08-01&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-25)
Short form
praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-post-market-monitoring-proctoring-tentamens@1.0.0 (sha256 683c18d4)
BibTeX
@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-example-example-post-market-monitoring-proctoring-tentamens-1-0-0,
author = {{Praxikon}},
title = {Proctoring during exams: which real-world data the institution reports back},
year = {2026},
version = {1.0.0},
number = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-post-market-monitoring-proctoring-tentamens},
howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
note = {effective_at 2024-08-01T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 683c18d4fac97ff4db4363416589f34e9615625ed4323784e0b292b8d25ad231},
url = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-post-market-monitoring-proctoring-tentamens},
urldate = {2026-08-25},
language = {en}
}CSL JSON
[
{
"id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-post-market-monitoring-proctoring-tentamens@1.0.0",
"type": "dataset",
"title": "Proctoring during exams: which real-world data the institution reports back",
"container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
"publisher": "Praxikon",
"version": "1.0.0",
"number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-post-market-monitoring-proctoring-tentamens",
"URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/example/example-post-market-monitoring-proctoring-tentamens",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
8
]
]
},
"accessed": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
25
]
]
},
"note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2024-08-01T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 683c18d4fac97ff4db4363416589f34e9615625ed4323784e0b292b8d25ad231; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aexample%3Aexample-post-market-monitoring-proctoring-tentamens&effective_at=2024-08-01&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
}
]How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms
For agents and integrations
This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.