The Article 6(3) filter: four exhaustive grounds, to be read narrowly
A system falling within Annex III can still stay outside high-risk if one of four grounds is met and the system does not perform profiling. The provider makes that call itself, must document the assessment before placing the system on the market, and must register the system in the EU database.
The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map
Address and citation
This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.
- Identifier
praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-article-6-3-filter-mechanism- Payload hash (sha256)
d6fc330373b2b9b704080d8d34c00f20be28c6ee7ba1357e09733209bdfd75ef
Citation line
Praxikon, "The Article 6(3) filter: four exhaustive grounds, to be read narrowly", praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-article-6-3-filter-mechanism@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 d6fc330373b2b9b704080d8d34c00f20be28c6ee7ba1357e09733209bdfd75ef- Version
- 1.0.0
- Legal time (effective_at)
- 8 August 2026
- Knowledge time (known_at)
- 8 August 2026
- Closed on
- Not closed
- Topics
- guidance
Review status: Placed against the official source (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.
What this object links to
Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.
The obligation this hangs off
1 of 1 shown
The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems
Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification (19 May 2026), Annex III chapter, sections 2.7, 2.7.1, 2.7.3 and 2.7.4, paragraphs (84) to (90) and (113) to (117)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
ObligationArticles 43-49: conformity assessment, CE and registration
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:conformity-ce-registration
What this object is about
2 of 2 shown
The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems
Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification (19 May 2026), Annex III chapter, sections 2.7, 2.7.1, 2.7.3 and 2.7.4, paragraphs (84) to (90) and (113) to (117)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
ActorDeployer
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:deployer
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider
What this object states
Official fact
Attributable to a named primary source, with a locator. Where they differ, the official source prevails.
According to the non-binding draft guidelines of 19 May 2026 on the classification of high-risk AI, Article 6(3) sets out four grounds on which a provider may exempt a system from high-risk classification: performing a narrow procedural task, improving the result of a previously completed human activity, detecting decision-making patterns or deviations from prior patterns without replacing or influencing the previously completed human assessment absent proper human review, and performing a preparatory task. Paragraph (88) of this draft states these grounds are exhaustive but alternative, that there is no separate independent risk test, and that they must be interpreted narrowly because Article 6(3) is an exception to rules that among other things protect fundamental rights. Paragraph (87) states the filter applies only to systems under Article 6(2) and not to systems under Article 6(1). Paragraph (89) states a system always remains high-risk where it performs profiling. Paragraph (90) adds that the filter does not apply where the system forms part of a complex system whose combined intended purpose or joint outputs materially influence an individual decision, including agentic AI. Paragraphs (113) to (116) of this draft describe that this is a self-assessment by the provider, that Article 6(4) requires documenting the assessment before placing on the market and registering in the Article 71 EU database, and that the assessment must contain at least the intended purpose, why the system falls under Article 6(2), which Article 6(3) condition applies and why, and why the system does not perform profiling. Paragraph (117) of these draft guidelines points to Articles 80 and 99 where an authority finds a system was misclassified as non high-risk to circumvent the rules.
- Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification (19 May 2026), Annex III chapter, sections 2.7, 2.7.1, 2.7.3 and 2.7.4, paragraphs (84) to (90) and (113) to (117)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source
Our interpretation
Our own reading. It can change without the law changing, and it is not the position of a supervisory authority.
The filter is not a soft way out but a documented and visible decision. You leave the Chapter III high-risk obligations, but in exchange you appear in the public EU database and your reasoning must be available to the regulator at any time. For buyers that is a gift: the draft guidelines expressly encourage deployers to check that database to see whether a vendor relies on the exception.
- Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification (19 May 2026), Annex III chapter, sections 2.7, 2.7.1, 2.7.3 and 2.7.4, paragraphs (84) to (90) and (113) to (117)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source
Recommended step
A practical step we consider appropriate. Not an obligation following from the Regulation.
Write the filter file in four fixed blocks: intended purpose, why it falls under Annex III, which ground you invoke with reasoning, and why there is no profiling. Never rely on the filter because the risk feels low, since that free-standing test does not exist. When procuring, always check the EU database before believing a vendor who says its system is not high-risk.
- Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification (19 May 2026), Annex III chapter, sections 2.7, 2.7.1, 2.7.3 and 2.7.4, paragraphs (84) to (90) and (113) to (117)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source
When this applies
No condition recorded on this object.
When this does not apply
No exception recorded on this object.
Referring to this object
Citation block
Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.
Reference
Praxikon, "The Article 6(3) filter: four exhaustive grounds, to be read narrowly", praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-article-6-3-filter-mechanism@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 d6fc330373b2b9b704080d8d34c00f20be28c6ee7ba1357e09733209bdfd75ef, https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/guidance/guidance-high-risk-article-6-3-filter-mechanism (https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aguidance%3Aguidance-high-risk-article-6-3-filter-mechanism&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-25)
Short form
praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-article-6-3-filter-mechanism@1.0.0 (sha256 d6fc3303)
BibTeX
@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-guidance-guidance-high-risk-article-6-3-filter-mechanism-1-0-0,
author = {{Praxikon}},
title = {The Article 6(3) filter: four exhaustive grounds, to be read narrowly},
year = {2026},
version = {1.0.0},
number = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-article-6-3-filter-mechanism},
howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
note = {effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 d6fc330373b2b9b704080d8d34c00f20be28c6ee7ba1357e09733209bdfd75ef},
url = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/guidance/guidance-high-risk-article-6-3-filter-mechanism},
urldate = {2026-08-25},
language = {en}
}CSL JSON
[
{
"id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-article-6-3-filter-mechanism@1.0.0",
"type": "dataset",
"title": "The Article 6(3) filter: four exhaustive grounds, to be read narrowly",
"container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
"publisher": "Praxikon",
"version": "1.0.0",
"number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-article-6-3-filter-mechanism",
"URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/guidance/guidance-high-risk-article-6-3-filter-mechanism",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
8
]
]
},
"accessed": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
25
]
]
},
"note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 d6fc330373b2b9b704080d8d34c00f20be28c6ee7ba1357e09733209bdfd75ef; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aguidance%3Aguidance-high-risk-article-6-3-filter-mechanism&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
}
]How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms
For agents and integrations
This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.