Broadly positioned and general purpose AI systems: a disclaimer is not enough
If you market a system broadly without consistently limiting its application, high-risk use cases will be read into its intended purpose. Merely stating in the terms of service that high-risk uses are excluded is insufficient where the rest of your presentation in fact enables or promotes such uses.
The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map
Address and citation
This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.
- Identifier
praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-broad-marketing-and-gpai-systems- Payload hash (sha256)
81fc87af44dd5631c6f242e98843aada30a807c4dcf29a9aafaa85879df1c01a
Citation line
Praxikon, "Broadly positioned and general purpose AI systems: a disclaimer is not enough", praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-broad-marketing-and-gpai-systems@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 81fc87af44dd5631c6f242e98843aada30a807c4dcf29a9aafaa85879df1c01a- Version
- 1.0.0
- Legal time (effective_at)
- 8 August 2026
- Knowledge time (known_at)
- 8 August 2026
- Closed on
- Not closed
- Topics
- guidance
Review status: Placed against the official source (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.
What this object links to
Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.
The obligation this hangs off
1 of 1 shown
The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems
Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification (19 May 2026), General principles chapter, section II.2, paragraph (12)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
ObligationAnnex III: high-risk AI
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:annex-iii-high-risk
What this object is about
2 of 2 shown
The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems
Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification (19 May 2026), General principles chapter, section II.2, paragraph (12)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
ActorDeployer
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:deployer
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider
What this object states
Official fact
Attributable to a named primary source, with a locator. Where they differ, the official source prevails.
According to the non-binding draft guidelines of 19 May 2026 on the classification of high-risk AI, paragraph (12) provides that where the instructions for use, contractual arrangements, terms of service, usage policy, promotional and sales materials or technical documentation present the AI system as broadly applicable across a generality of contexts and functions, and do not consistently limit its application or exclude high-risk uses, the system's intended purpose will be deemed to also encompass high-risk use cases and therefore qualify as high-risk. Under these draft guidelines this applies in particular where such uses are feasible and reasonably foreseeable given the system's functionalities and capabilities. The same paragraph states that merely asserting, for example in the terms of service, that high-risk uses are excluded is insufficient where the provider's overall presentation, examples or product positioning effectively provides for or promotes such uses, and that any limitations of use must be described clearly, concretely and coherently across all materials.
- Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification (19 May 2026), General principles chapter, section II.2, paragraph (12)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source
Our interpretation
Our own reading. It can change without the law changing, and it is not the position of a supervisory authority.
This mainly affects providers of broad assistants, agents and platforms who say the product is not meant for HR, education or credit assessment, but show demos, templates or customer stories in exactly those contexts. The draft guidelines look at the whole of your communications, not at the strictest sentence in the small print. For buyers it means a vendor hiding behind a clause does not relieve you of your own assessment.
- Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification (19 May 2026), General principles chapter, section II.2, paragraph (12)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source
Recommended step
A practical step we consider appropriate. Not an obligation following from the Regulation.
If you genuinely want to exclude high-risk use, make that real in the product and not only on paper. Remove demos and examples in excluded domains, build technical or contractual blocks, and make sure sales, website and documentation draw the same line. If you cannot sustain that, assume high-risk and build your evidence file accordingly.
- Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification (19 May 2026), General principles chapter, section II.2, paragraph (12)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source
When this applies
No condition recorded on this object.
When this does not apply
No exception recorded on this object.
Referring to this object
Citation block
Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.
Reference
Praxikon, "Broadly positioned and general purpose AI systems: a disclaimer is not enough", praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-broad-marketing-and-gpai-systems@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 81fc87af44dd5631c6f242e98843aada30a807c4dcf29a9aafaa85879df1c01a, https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/guidance/guidance-high-risk-broad-marketing-and-gpai-systems (https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aguidance%3Aguidance-high-risk-broad-marketing-and-gpai-systems&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-25)
Short form
praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-broad-marketing-and-gpai-systems@1.0.0 (sha256 81fc87af)
BibTeX
@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-guidance-guidance-high-risk-broad-marketing-and-gpai-systems-1-0-0,
author = {{Praxikon}},
title = {Broadly positioned and general purpose AI systems: a disclaimer is not enough},
year = {2026},
version = {1.0.0},
number = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-broad-marketing-and-gpai-systems},
howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
note = {effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 81fc87af44dd5631c6f242e98843aada30a807c4dcf29a9aafaa85879df1c01a},
url = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/guidance/guidance-high-risk-broad-marketing-and-gpai-systems},
urldate = {2026-08-25},
language = {en}
}CSL JSON
[
{
"id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-broad-marketing-and-gpai-systems@1.0.0",
"type": "dataset",
"title": "Broadly positioned and general purpose AI systems: a disclaimer is not enough",
"container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
"publisher": "Praxikon",
"version": "1.0.0",
"number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-broad-marketing-and-gpai-systems",
"URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/guidance/guidance-high-risk-broad-marketing-and-gpai-systems",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
8
]
]
},
"accessed": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
25
]
]
},
"note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 81fc87af44dd5631c6f242e98843aada30a807c4dcf29a9aafaa85879df1c01a; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aguidance%3Aguidance-high-risk-broad-marketing-and-gpai-systems&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
}
]How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms
For agents and integrations
This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.