GuidanceGuidancev1.0.0

A human in the loop does not make a system low-risk

Human oversight is a compliance requirement for high-risk systems, not a way to escape classification. Human involvement only counts when determining what task the system performs.

The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map

Address and citation

This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.

Identifier: praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-human-oversight-no-declassification
Payload hash (sha256): 9124b610886a642919da8ee9b2e63bae08e06271624198ce5721f6c5683b10fb

Citation line

Praxikon, "A human in the loop does not make a system low-risk", praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-human-oversight-no-declassification@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 9124b610886a642919da8ee9b2e63bae08e06271624198ce5721f6c5683b10fb

Version: 1.0.0
Legal time (effective_at): 8 August 2026
Knowledge time (known_at): 8 August 2026
Closed on: Not closed
Topics: guidance

Review status: Placed against the official source (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.

What this object links to

Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.

The obligation this hangs off

1 of 1 shown

The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.

Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
- Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems
  Locator: Section IV.2.1, paragraphs 70 and 71
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines
  Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
- ObligationAnnex III: high-risk AI
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:annex-iii-high-risk

What this object is about

2 of 2 shown

The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.

Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
- Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems
  Locator: Section IV.2.1, paragraphs 70 and 71
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines
  Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Consequence
- ActorDeployer
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:deployer
- ActorProvider of an AI system
  praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider

What this object states

Official fact

Attributable to a named primary source, with a locator. Where they differ, the official source prevails.

In the non-binding draft guidelines of 19 May 2026, the Commission states in paragraphs 70 and 71 that classification under Article 6(2) depends solely on whether the system's intended purpose falls within an Annex III use case. Human involvement cannot change the purpose and area of intended use and therefore has no effect on that classification; human oversight is instead a condition for compliance under Article 14. Under the draft, the type and degree of human involvement can play a role in the filter mechanism, but only to demonstrate that the system's tasks are narrow procedural or preparatory in nature, or merely improve a previously completed human activity. The draft expressly adds that a provider cannot label a system as low-risk simply by adding a human involvement requirement to it.
- Locator: Section IV.2.1, paragraphs 70 and 71praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source

Our interpretation

Our own reading. It can change without the law changing, and it is not the position of a supervisory authority.

The common reassurance that a human always reviews the output changes nothing about classification. In fact, the document's examples dismiss formal human review precisely where the output in practice weighs heavily on the outcome.
- Locator: Section IV.2.1, paragraphs 70 and 71praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source

Recommended step

A practical step we consider appropriate. Not an obligation following from the Regulation.

Base your classification on the intended purpose, not on your workflow. If you want to use human involvement in the argument, tie it to the system's task type and show the human assessment is substantive and complete, not a formality.
- Locator: Section IV.2.1, paragraphs 70 and 71praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source

When this applies

No condition recorded on this object.

When this does not apply

No exception recorded on this object.

Referring to this object

Citation block

Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.

Reference

Praxikon, "A human in the loop does not make a system low-risk",
praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-human-oversight-no-declassification@1.0.0,
dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0),
effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z,
sha256 9124b610886a642919da8ee9b2e63bae08e06271624198ce5721f6c5683b10fb,
https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/guidance/guidance-high-risk-human-oversight-no-declassification
(https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aguidance%3Aguidance-high-risk-human-oversight-no-declassification&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-25)

Short form

praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-human-oversight-no-declassification@1.0.0 (sha256 9124b610)

BibTeX

@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-guidance-guidance-high-risk-human-oversight-no-declassification-1-0-0,
  author       = {{Praxikon}},
  title        = {A human in the loop does not make a system low-risk},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {1.0.0},
  number       = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-human-oversight-no-declassification},
  howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
  note         = {effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 9124b610886a642919da8ee9b2e63bae08e06271624198ce5721f6c5683b10fb},
  url          = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/guidance/guidance-high-risk-human-oversight-no-declassification},
  urldate      = {2026-08-25},
  language     = {en}
}

CSL JSON

[
  {
    "id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-human-oversight-no-declassification@1.0.0",
    "type": "dataset",
    "title": "A human in the loop does not make a system low-risk",
    "container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
    "publisher": "Praxikon",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-human-oversight-no-declassification",
    "URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/guidance/guidance-high-risk-human-oversight-no-declassification",
    "language": "en",
    "issued": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          8
        ]
      ]
    },
    "accessed": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          25
        ]
      ]
    },
    "note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 9124b610886a642919da8ee9b2e63bae08e06271624198ce5721f6c5683b10fb; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aguidance%3Aguidance-high-risk-human-oversight-no-declassification&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
  }
]

How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms

For agents and integrations

This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.

Open as JSON Open as JSON-LD Read the methodology