Skip to main content
Praxikon
Back to the explorer
GuidanceGuidancev1.0.0

When a customer or distributor itself becomes the provider

Distributors, importers, deployers and other third parties can take on provider obligations. That happens when you put your own name or trademark on a system, when you make a substantial modification to a high-risk system, and when you change the intended purpose of a non high-risk system so that it becomes high-risk.

The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map

Address and citation

This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.

Identifier
praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-substantial-modification-article-25
Payload hash (sha256)
cf761dadbb93aa15f6b1773ef8ac6d7a5dec66037327356ff1634cabdd7ee54d

Citation line

Praxikon, "When a customer or distributor itself becomes the provider", praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-substantial-modification-article-25@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 cf761dadbb93aa15f6b1773ef8ac6d7a5dec66037327356ff1634cabdd7ee54d
Version
1.0.0
Legal time (effective_at)
8 August 2026
Knowledge time (known_at)
8 August 2026
Closed on
Not closed
Topics
guidance

Review status: Placed against the official source (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.

What this object links to

Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.

The obligation this hangs off

1 of 1 shown

The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.

  1. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems

      Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification (19 May 2026), General principles chapter, section II.2, paragraph (14) and its footnote 6

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines

      Open official source

    Via

    No condition or exception recorded on this object.

    Consequence

What this object is about

2 of 2 shown

The object is about this role. Undifferentiated: it does not follow that the duty rests on this role.

  1. Source

    Official fact on this object, with its locator.

    • Draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems

      Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification (19 May 2026), General principles chapter, section II.2, paragraph (14) and its footnote 6

      praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelines

      Open official source

    Via

    No condition or exception recorded on this object.

    Consequence

What this object states

Official fact

Attributable to a named primary source, with a locator. Where they differ, the official source prevails.

  • The draft guidelines of 19 May 2026 on the classification of high-risk AI, which are not binding, note in paragraph (14) that distributors, importers, deployers or other third parties may become subject to provider obligations under Article 25(1) where they, first, put their name or trademark on a high-risk AI system already placed on the market or put into service; second, make a substantial modification to a high-risk AI system already placed on the market or put into service in such a way that it remains a high-risk AI system; or third, modify the intended purpose of an AI system, including a general-purpose AI system, which had not been classified as high-risk, in such a way that the system becomes a high-risk AI system under Article 6. A footnote to that paragraph announces that the Commission is preparing separate guidelines on responsibilities along the AI value chain under Article 25.

    • Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification (19 May 2026), General principles chapter, section II.2, paragraph (14) and its footnote 6praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source

Our interpretation

Our own reading. It can change without the law changing, and it is not the position of a supervisory authority.

  • The third situation is the most underestimated. An organisation that buys a broadly deployable model or assistant and then aims it at recruitment, employee evaluation or access to services changes the intended purpose and can thereby become the provider of a high-risk system, with the full set of obligations. White labelling under your own brand is also enough, without changing a single line of code.

    • Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification (19 May 2026), General principles chapter, section II.2, paragraph (14) and its footnote 6praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source

Recommended step

A practical step we consider appropriate. Not an obligation following from the Regulation.

  • Introduce a standing check before you rebrand, modify or repurpose a procured AI system. Assess for each change whether you land in one of the three Article 25(1) situations and record that assessment. Make this part of your procurement and change process, not a one-off project check.

    • Locator: Draft guidelines on high-risk AI classification (19 May 2026), General principles chapter, section II.2, paragraph (14) and its footnote 6praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:commission-draft-high-risk-classification-guidelinesOpen official source

When this applies

No condition recorded on this object.

When this does not apply

No exception recorded on this object.

Referring to this object

Citation block

Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.

Reference

Praxikon, "When a customer or distributor itself becomes the provider",
praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-substantial-modification-article-25@1.0.0,
dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0),
effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z,
sha256 cf761dadbb93aa15f6b1773ef8ac6d7a5dec66037327356ff1634cabdd7ee54d,
https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/guidance/guidance-high-risk-substantial-modification-article-25
(https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aguidance%3Aguidance-high-risk-substantial-modification-article-25&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-25)

Short form

praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-substantial-modification-article-25@1.0.0 (sha256 cf761dad)

BibTeX

@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-guidance-guidance-high-risk-substantial-modification-article-25-1-0-0,
  author       = {{Praxikon}},
  title        = {When a customer or distributor itself becomes the provider},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {1.0.0},
  number       = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-substantial-modification-article-25},
  howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
  note         = {effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 cf761dadbb93aa15f6b1773ef8ac6d7a5dec66037327356ff1634cabdd7ee54d},
  url          = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/guidance/guidance-high-risk-substantial-modification-article-25},
  urldate      = {2026-08-25},
  language     = {en}
}

CSL JSON

[
  {
    "id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-substantial-modification-article-25@1.0.0",
    "type": "dataset",
    "title": "When a customer or distributor itself becomes the provider",
    "container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
    "publisher": "Praxikon",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:guidance:guidance-high-risk-substantial-modification-article-25",
    "URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/guidance/guidance-high-risk-substantial-modification-article-25",
    "language": "en",
    "issued": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          8
        ]
      ]
    },
    "accessed": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          25
        ]
      ]
    },
    "note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 cf761dadbb93aa15f6b1773ef8ac6d7a5dec66037327356ff1634cabdd7ee54d; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/entities?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aguidance%3Aguidance-high-risk-substantial-modification-article-25&effective_at=2026-08-08&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
  }
]

How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms

For agents and integrations

This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.