Skip to main content
Praxikon

Explorer

Why this object hangs off that object

Every object in this graph has its own address and can be cited on its own. This page shows which objects exist and, once you open one, why it hangs off another: from which source with its locator, through which condition or exception, to which consequence.

Since the last release an obligation states separately who carries the duty and who is merely affected. Filter by duty holder and you get the duties resting on a role; filter by actor and you get everything that is about that role. That difference is visible on purpose.

This is the knowledge layer under the four levels of the assessment. See the four levels.

Filters

Only dimensions the data carries. A dimension without values is absent rather than empty.

Eleven types, including evidence, control and standard.

Is about this role. Walks the role hierarchy upward.

The duty rests on this role, not merely: it is about it.

The article route this object hangs off.

Free slugs, not a taxonomy with objects of its own.

The phase of the object, not its quality.

Whether this object carries a source line of its own.

Searches label, summary, topics, conditions and statement texts. The ordering is the same heuristic as the search API; build on the identifiers, not on the ranking.

Time

Two axes. Legal time is what applied; knowledge time is what we had published by then. Leaving them empty means the default of this release.

Clear all

Objects

8 objects in this selection.

  1. ChangeApplicablev1.0.04 relations

    The AI Act enters into force

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2024-08-01-entry-into-force

    The regulation entered into force on 1 August 2024, after which the obligations followed in phases.

    Hangs off: Article 4: AI literacy, Article 5: prohibited practices

    Placed against the official source | timeline

  2. ChangeApplicablev1.0.04 relations

    Prohibited practices and AI literacy apply

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2025-02-02-prohibitions-and-literacy-applicable

    Since 2 February 2025 the Article 5 prohibition and the Article 4 AI literacy duty apply.

    Hangs off: Article 4: AI literacy, Article 5: prohibited practices

    Placed against the official source | ai-literacy, timeline

  3. ChangeGuidancev1.0.02 relations

    General-Purpose AI Code of Practice published

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2025-07-10-gpai-code-of-practice

    The voluntary code of practice gives GPAI model providers a route to demonstrate compliance.

    Hangs off: Article 53: GPAI model providers

    Placed against the official source | gpai

  4. ChangeGuidancev1.0.03 relations

    Guidelines on the scope of the GPAI obligations

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2025-07-18-gpai-guidelines

    The Commission explains when someone becomes the provider of a GPAI model, including through fine-tuning.

    Hangs off: Article 53: GPAI model providers, Article 55: GPAI models with systemic risk

    Placed against the official source | gpai

  5. ChangeGuidancev1.0.03 relations

    Guidelines on the definition of an AI system

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2025-07-29-ai-system-definition-guidelines

    The Commission draws the line between software that does and does not fall under the regulation.

    Hangs off: Article 4: AI literacy

    Placed against the official source | scope

  6. ChangeGuidancev1.0.03 relations

    Guidelines on prohibited AI practices

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2025-07-29-prohibited-practices-guidelines

    Worked examples for each Article 5 prohibition, with the line between permitted and prohibited.

    Hangs off: Article 5: prohibited practices

    Placed against the official source | prohibited

  7. ChangeApplicablev1.0.03 relations

    GPAI model obligations apply

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2025-08-02-gpai-obligations-applicable

    Since 2 August 2025 the obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models apply.

    Hangs off: Article 53: GPAI model providers, Article 55: GPAI models with systemic risk

    Placed against the official source | gpai, timeline

  8. ChangeUpcomingv1.0.04 relations

    Legacy GPAI models must comply

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2027-08-02-legacy-gpai-models-comply

    Models placed on the market before 2 August 2025 have until 2 August 2027.

    Hangs off: Article 53: GPAI model providers, Article 55: GPAI models with systemic risk

    Placed against the official source | gpai, timeline

What this explorer does not do

  • There is no article object. The article sits as a locator on the citations of an obligation, as free text. Filtering on the obligation is the same question, and the data does carry that.
  • No object carries an Annex III domain or use case. A selection of the form "systems for this purpose" cannot be expressed here.
  • A locator hangs on a statement in the data, not on a relation. The source next to a path is the source anchor of the object carrying the relation, not proof of that one connection.
  • The split between duty holder and affected actor exists on obligations only. On every other type the actor list is still one undifferentiated list.
  • The graph stores no inverse relations. The incoming direction is computed here over the same release and adds nothing to the data.
  • Topics are free slugs, not a taxonomy with objects, labels or a hierarchy of their own.

The same selection as data

The explorer and the API read the same object against the same two time axes. What you see here can be fetched with the same parameters.