Skip to main content
Praxikon

Explorer

Why this object hangs off that object

Every object in this graph has its own address and can be cited on its own. This page shows which objects exist and, once you open one, why it hangs off another: from which source with its locator, through which condition or exception, to which consequence.

Since the last release an obligation states separately who carries the duty and who is merely affected. Filter by duty holder and you get the duties resting on a role; filter by actor and you get everything that is about that role. That difference is visible on purpose.

This is the knowledge layer under the four levels of the assessment. See the four levels.

Filters

Only dimensions the data carries. A dimension without values is absent rather than empty.

Eleven types, including evidence, control and standard.

Is about this role. Walks the role hierarchy upward.

The duty rests on this role, not merely: it is about it.

The article route this object hangs off.

Free slugs, not a taxonomy with objects of its own.

The phase of the object, not its quality.

Whether this object carries a source line of its own.

Searches label, summary, topics, conditions and statement texts. The ordering is the same heuristic as the search API; build on the identifiers, not on the ranking.

Time

Two axes. Legal time is what applied; knowledge time is what we had published by then. Leaving them empty means the default of this release.

Clear all

Active filters

Objects

20 objects in this selection.

  1. ChangeApplicablev1.0.04 relations

    The AI Act enters into force

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2024-08-01-entry-into-force

    The regulation entered into force on 1 August 2024, after which the obligations followed in phases.

    Hangs off: Article 4: AI literacy, Article 5: prohibited practices

    Placed against the official source | timeline

  2. ChangeApplicablev1.0.04 relations

    Prohibited practices and AI literacy apply

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2025-02-02-prohibitions-and-literacy-applicable

    Since 2 February 2025 the Article 5 prohibition and the Article 4 AI literacy duty apply.

    Hangs off: Article 4: AI literacy, Article 5: prohibited practices

    Placed against the official source | ai-literacy, timeline

  3. ChangeGuidancev1.0.02 relations

    General-Purpose AI Code of Practice published

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2025-07-10-gpai-code-of-practice

    The voluntary code of practice gives GPAI model providers a route to demonstrate compliance.

    Hangs off: Article 53: GPAI model providers

    Placed against the official source | gpai

  4. ChangeGuidancev1.0.03 relations

    Guidelines on the scope of the GPAI obligations

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2025-07-18-gpai-guidelines

    The Commission explains when someone becomes the provider of a GPAI model, including through fine-tuning.

    Hangs off: Article 53: GPAI model providers, Article 55: GPAI models with systemic risk

    Placed against the official source | gpai

  5. ChangeGuidancev1.0.04 relations

    Guidelines on the definition of an AI system

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2025-07-29-ai-system-definition-guidelines

    The Commission draws the line between software that does and does not fall under the regulation.

    Hangs off: Annex III: high-risk AI, Article 4: AI literacy

    Placed against the official source | scope

  6. ChangeGuidancev1.0.03 relations

    Guidelines on prohibited AI practices

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2025-07-29-prohibited-practices-guidelines

    Worked examples for each Article 5 prohibition, with the line between permitted and prohibited.

    Hangs off: Article 5: prohibited practices

    Placed against the official source | prohibited

  7. ChangeApplicablev1.0.03 relations

    GPAI model obligations apply

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2025-08-02-gpai-obligations-applicable

    Since 2 August 2025 the obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models apply.

    Hangs off: Article 53: GPAI model providers, Article 55: GPAI models with systemic risk

    Placed against the official source | gpai, timeline

  8. ChangeGuidancev1.0.04 relations

    Draft guidelines on high-risk classification

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2026-05-19-draft-high-risk-guidelines

    The Commission explains in consultation when a system falls under Annex I or Annex III.

    Hangs off: Annex III: high-risk AI, Articles 43-49: conformity assessment, CE and registration

    Placed against the official source | high-risk

  9. ChangeGuidancev1.0.03 relations

    Transparency Code of Practice published

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2026-06-10-transparency-code-of-practice

    A voluntary route to comply with parts of Article 50, in two separately signable sections.

    Hangs off: Article 50: transparency

    Placed against the official source | transparency

  10. ChangeGuidancev1.0.02 relations

    First European AI Act standard approved

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2026-07-12-en-18286-approved

    EN 18286:2026 on the quality management system is the first completed standard under the standardisation request.

    Hangs off: Article 17: quality management system

    Placed against the official source | standards

  11. ChangeGuidancev1.0.03 relations

    Final guidelines on Article 50

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2026-07-20-article-50-guidelines

    The Commission works out the transparency duties and confirms they apply from 2 August 2026.

    Hangs off: Article 50: transparency

    Placed against the official source | transparency

  12. ChangeIn forcev1.0.05 relations

    Annex III core rules moved to 2 December 2027

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2026-07-27-annex-iii-date

    The amended application date has been binding law since 27 July 2026.

    Hangs off: Annex III: high-risk AI

    Placed against the official source | high-risk

  13. ChangeIn forcev1.0.05 relations

    Article 4 amended to a duty to take measures

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2026-07-27-article-4-amended

    Since 27 July 2026 the organisational duty supports the development of AI literacy without guaranteeing an individual level.

    Hangs off: Article 4: AI literacy

    Placed against the official source | ai-literacy

  14. ChangeIn forcev1.0.06 relations

    FRIA follows new date and may cross-reference a DPIA

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2026-07-27-fria-date-and-dpia-link

    The FRIA for the relevant Annex III route follows 2 December 2027 and may include or cross-reference relevant DPIA elements.

    Hangs off: Article 27: FRIA

    Placed against the official source | fundamental-rights, high-risk

  15. ChangeApplicablev1.0.05 relations

    Article 50 is applicable

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2026-08-02-article-50-applicable

    The transparency duties apply since 2 August 2026.

    Hangs off: Article 50: transparency

    Placed against the official source | transparency

  16. ChangeApplicablev1.0.04 relations

    GPAI enforcement powers active

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2026-08-02-gpai-enforcement

    Since 2 August 2026 the Commission can request GPAI information, conduct evaluations and require measures.

    Hangs off: Article 53: GPAI model providers

    Placed against the official source | enforcement, gpai

  17. ChangeUpcomingv1.0.02 relations

    Grace period for machine-readable marking ends

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2026-12-02-article-50-marking-grace-ends

    Systems placed on the market before 2 August 2026 must comply with Article 50(2) by 2 December 2026.

    Hangs off: Article 50: transparency

    Placed against the official source | timeline, transparency

  18. ChangeUpcomingv1.0.02 relations

    New prohibitions require technical safeguards

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2026-12-02-new-prohibitions-technical-safeguards

    The Digital Omnibus prohibits AI for child sexual abuse material and non-consensual intimate imagery.

    Hangs off: Article 5: prohibited practices

    Placed against the official source | prohibited, timeline

  19. ChangeUpcomingv1.0.03 relations

    Legacy GPAI models must comply

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2027-08-02-legacy-gpai-models-comply

    Models placed on the market before 2 August 2025 have until 2 August 2027.

    Hangs off: Article 53: GPAI model providers, Article 55: GPAI models with systemic risk

    Placed against the official source | gpai, timeline

  20. ChangeUpcomingv1.0.03 relations

    High-risk AI embedded in regulated products

    praxikon:eu:ai-act:change:2028-08-02-annex-i-high-risk-applicable

    AI as a safety component of products under Annex I follows on 2 August 2028.

    Hangs off: Annex III: high-risk AI, Articles 43-49: conformity assessment, CE and registration

    Placed against the official source | high-risk, timeline

What this explorer does not do

  • There is no article object. The article sits as a locator on the citations of an obligation, as free text. Filtering on the obligation is the same question, and the data does carry that.
  • No object carries an Annex III domain or use case. A selection of the form "systems for this purpose" cannot be expressed here.
  • A locator hangs on a statement in the data, not on a relation. The source next to a path is the source anchor of the object carrying the relation, not proof of that one connection.
  • The split between duty holder and affected actor exists on obligations only. On every other type the actor list is still one undifferentiated list.
  • The graph stores no inverse relations. The incoming direction is computed here over the same release and adds nothing to the data.
  • Topics are free slugs, not a taxonomy with objects, labels or a hierarchy of their own.

The same selection as data

The explorer and the API read the same object against the same two time axes. What you see here can be fetched with the same parameters.

Open this selection as JSONRead the methodology