Comparison
Article 50 versus Article 13: two kinds of transparency
The difference
Article 50 points transparency at the person facing the system: whoever talks to AI or looks at generated content has to be able to know it. Article 13 points transparency at the organisation deploying the system: the provider has to give the deployer enough information to use the system correctly.
The official source remains authoritative. This is general interpretation and not legal advice about your situation.
The fields side by side
Every row comes from the objects themselves. Where a field is empty, it says so; we do not fill in an assumption where the source is silent.
Status
- Article 50, towards people
- Applicable
- Article 13, towards the organisation
- Upcoming
Applies from
- Article 50, towards people
- 2 August 2026
- Article 13, towards the organisation
- 2 December 2027
Who carries the duty
- Article 50, towards people
- Deployer, Provider of an AI system
- Article 13, towards the organisation
- Provider of an AI system
Who is affected
- Article 50, towards people
- Not recorded
- Article 13, towards the organisation
- Deployer
Who supervises
- Article 50, towards people
- Not recorded
- Article 13, towards the organisation
- Not recorded
When this applies
- Article 50, towards people
- An AI system is intended to interact directly with natural persons. The system generates or manipulates synthetic audio, image, video or text, or the use concerns a specifically listed deployer scenario.
- Article 13, towards the organisation
- The provider supplies a high-risk system; the deployer uses it according to the instructions.
Exceptions
- Article 50, towards people
- The direct-interaction disclosure is not required where this is obvious to a reasonably well-informed, observant and circumspect person, considering circumstances and context. Only Article 50(2) has a transition until 2 December 2026 for systems placed on the market before 2 August 2026.
- Article 13, towards the organisation
- The level of detail may match the intended deployer’s knowledge; trade secrets need not be disclosed.
First actions
- Article 50, towards people
- Implement the applicable disclosure, marking or label
- Article 13, towards the organisation
- Provide complete instructions for use
Evidence that belongs with it
- Article 50, towards people
- Transparency implementation record
- Article 13, towards the organisation
- Instructions and interpretation file
Control
- Article 50, towards people
- Pre-release transparency check
- Article 13, towards the organisation
- Instructions check at deployment
Version and review status
- Article 50, towards people
- v1.0.0, placed against the official source
- Article 13, towards the organisation
- v1.0.0, placed against the official source
Official sources and locators
Per side, the provisions the statements above rest on.
Article 50, towards people
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 50(1)-(5) and Article 113
Open official sourceGuidelines on Article 50
Locator: Final guidelines, scope by Article 50 paragraph
Open official sourceGuidelines on Article 50
Locator: Implementation guidance for providers and deployers
Open official source
Article 13, towards the organisation
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 13(1)-(3)
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
Open official source
Referring to these two objects
Each side has its own stable identifier, version and hash. Take them separately; you cite a comparison by citing the two objects.
Referring to this object
Citation block
Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.
Reference
Praxikon, "Article 50: transparency", praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-50-transparency@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-02T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 239fbac0e4728dc239352b2f88b199c3cc098082ff72e2972b4b5e8a2b121406, https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-50-transparency (https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-50-transparency&effective_at=2026-08-02&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-24)
Short form
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-50-transparency@1.0.0 (sha256 239fbac0)
BibTeX
@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-obligation-article-50-transparency-1-0-0,
author = {{Praxikon}},
title = {Article 50: transparency},
year = {2026},
version = {1.0.0},
number = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-50-transparency},
howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
note = {effective_at 2026-08-02T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 239fbac0e4728dc239352b2f88b199c3cc098082ff72e2972b4b5e8a2b121406},
url = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-50-transparency},
urldate = {2026-08-24},
language = {en}
}CSL JSON
[
{
"id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-50-transparency@1.0.0",
"type": "dataset",
"title": "Article 50: transparency",
"container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
"publisher": "Praxikon",
"version": "1.0.0",
"number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-50-transparency",
"URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-50-transparency",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
8
]
]
},
"accessed": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
24
]
]
},
"note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-08-02T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 239fbac0e4728dc239352b2f88b199c3cc098082ff72e2972b4b5e8a2b121406; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-50-transparency&effective_at=2026-08-02&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
}
]How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms
Referring to this object
Citation block
Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.
Reference
Praxikon, "Article 13: transparency towards deployers", praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-13-instructions@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 818266e8912de0d2c95a38a4a16c67b1aad02d10359b3571710fd757c678819b, https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-13-instructions (https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-13-instructions&effective_at=2026-07-27&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-24)
Short form
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-13-instructions@1.0.0 (sha256 818266e8)
BibTeX
@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-obligation-article-13-instructions-1-0-0,
author = {{Praxikon}},
title = {Article 13: transparency towards deployers},
year = {2026},
version = {1.0.0},
number = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-13-instructions},
howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
note = {effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 818266e8912de0d2c95a38a4a16c67b1aad02d10359b3571710fd757c678819b},
url = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-13-instructions},
urldate = {2026-08-24},
language = {en}
}CSL JSON
[
{
"id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-13-instructions@1.0.0",
"type": "dataset",
"title": "Article 13: transparency towards deployers",
"container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
"publisher": "Praxikon",
"version": "1.0.0",
"number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-13-instructions",
"URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-13-instructions",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
8
]
]
},
"accessed": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
24
]
]
},
"note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 818266e8912de0d2c95a38a4a16c67b1aad02d10359b3571710fd757c678819b; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-13-instructions&effective_at=2026-07-27&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
}
]How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms
Execution
Decide per use case which transparency measure you take
Which of the two transparency duties applies depends on your role and on who is on the other side. Praxikon does not carry that out; Embed AI maps that per AI use case and sets the measure and the record alongside it.
See the Embed AI approachOther comparisons
- Article 16 versus Article 26: what the provider owes and what the deployer owes
- Article 26 versus Article 27: using and assessing
- Article 4 versus Article 14: literacy and human oversight
- GPAI versus high-risk: the model or the use
- Article 5 versus Annex III: prohibited or high-risk
- Article 11 versus Article 13: technical documentation and instructions for use
Unsure about your role itself rather than the duties that come with it? Work out whether you are a provider or a deployer