Skip to main content
Praxikon
Comparisons

Comparison

Article 50 versus Article 13: two kinds of transparency

The difference

Article 50 points transparency at the person facing the system: whoever talks to AI or looks at generated content has to be able to know it. Article 13 points transparency at the organisation deploying the system: the provider has to give the deployer enough information to use the system correctly.

The official source remains authoritative. This is general interpretation and not legal advice about your situation.

The fields side by side

Every row comes from the objects themselves. Where a field is empty, it says so; we do not fill in an assumption where the source is silent.

Status

Article 50, towards people
Applicable
Article 13, towards the organisation
Upcoming

Applies from

Article 50, towards people
2 August 2026
Article 13, towards the organisation
2 December 2027

Who carries the duty

Article 50, towards people
Deployer, Provider of an AI system
Article 13, towards the organisation
Provider of an AI system

Who is affected

Article 50, towards people
Not recorded
Article 13, towards the organisation
Deployer

Who supervises

Article 50, towards people
Not recorded
Article 13, towards the organisation
Not recorded

When this applies

Article 50, towards people
An AI system is intended to interact directly with natural persons. The system generates or manipulates synthetic audio, image, video or text, or the use concerns a specifically listed deployer scenario.
Article 13, towards the organisation
The provider supplies a high-risk system; the deployer uses it according to the instructions.

Exceptions

Article 50, towards people
The direct-interaction disclosure is not required where this is obvious to a reasonably well-informed, observant and circumspect person, considering circumstances and context. Only Article 50(2) has a transition until 2 December 2026 for systems placed on the market before 2 August 2026.
Article 13, towards the organisation
The level of detail may match the intended deployer’s knowledge; trade secrets need not be disclosed.

First actions

Article 50, towards people
Implement the applicable disclosure, marking or label
Article 13, towards the organisation
Provide complete instructions for use

Evidence that belongs with it

Article 50, towards people
Transparency implementation record
Article 13, towards the organisation
Instructions and interpretation file

Control

Article 50, towards people
Pre-release transparency check
Article 13, towards the organisation
Instructions check at deployment

Version and review status

Article 50, towards people
v1.0.0, placed against the official source
Article 13, towards the organisation
v1.0.0, placed against the official source

Official sources and locators

Per side, the provisions the statements above rest on.

Article 50, towards people

  • EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689

    Locator: Article 50(1)-(5) and Article 113

    Open official source
  • Guidelines on Article 50

    Locator: Final guidelines, scope by Article 50 paragraph

    Open official source
  • Guidelines on Article 50

    Locator: Implementation guidance for providers and deployers

    Open official source

Article 13, towards the organisation

Referring to these two objects

Each side has its own stable identifier, version and hash. Take them separately; you cite a comparison by citing the two objects.

Referring to this object

Citation block

Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.

Reference

Praxikon, "Article 50: transparency",
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-50-transparency@1.0.0,
dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0),
effective_at 2026-08-02T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z,
sha256 239fbac0e4728dc239352b2f88b199c3cc098082ff72e2972b4b5e8a2b121406,
https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-50-transparency
(https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-50-transparency&effective_at=2026-08-02&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-24)

Short form

praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-50-transparency@1.0.0 (sha256 239fbac0)

BibTeX

@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-obligation-article-50-transparency-1-0-0,
  author       = {{Praxikon}},
  title        = {Article 50: transparency},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {1.0.0},
  number       = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-50-transparency},
  howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
  note         = {effective_at 2026-08-02T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 239fbac0e4728dc239352b2f88b199c3cc098082ff72e2972b4b5e8a2b121406},
  url          = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-50-transparency},
  urldate      = {2026-08-24},
  language     = {en}
}

CSL JSON

[
  {
    "id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-50-transparency@1.0.0",
    "type": "dataset",
    "title": "Article 50: transparency",
    "container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
    "publisher": "Praxikon",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-50-transparency",
    "URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-50-transparency",
    "language": "en",
    "issued": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          8
        ]
      ]
    },
    "accessed": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          24
        ]
      ]
    },
    "note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-08-02T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 239fbac0e4728dc239352b2f88b199c3cc098082ff72e2972b4b5e8a2b121406; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-50-transparency&effective_at=2026-08-02&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
  }
]

How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms

Referring to this object

Citation block

Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.

Reference

Praxikon, "Article 13: transparency towards deployers",
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-13-instructions@1.0.0,
dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0),
effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z,
sha256 818266e8912de0d2c95a38a4a16c67b1aad02d10359b3571710fd757c678819b,
https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-13-instructions
(https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-13-instructions&effective_at=2026-07-27&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-24)

Short form

praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-13-instructions@1.0.0 (sha256 818266e8)

BibTeX

@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-obligation-article-13-instructions-1-0-0,
  author       = {{Praxikon}},
  title        = {Article 13: transparency towards deployers},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {1.0.0},
  number       = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-13-instructions},
  howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
  note         = {effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 818266e8912de0d2c95a38a4a16c67b1aad02d10359b3571710fd757c678819b},
  url          = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-13-instructions},
  urldate      = {2026-08-24},
  language     = {en}
}

CSL JSON

[
  {
    "id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-13-instructions@1.0.0",
    "type": "dataset",
    "title": "Article 13: transparency towards deployers",
    "container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
    "publisher": "Praxikon",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-13-instructions",
    "URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-13-instructions",
    "language": "en",
    "issued": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          8
        ]
      ]
    },
    "accessed": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          24
        ]
      ]
    },
    "note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 818266e8912de0d2c95a38a4a16c67b1aad02d10359b3571710fd757c678819b; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-13-instructions&effective_at=2026-07-27&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
  }
]

How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms

Execution

Decide per use case which transparency measure you take

Which of the two transparency duties applies depends on your role and on who is on the other side. Praxikon does not carry that out; Embed AI maps that per AI use case and sets the measure and the record alongside it.

See the Embed AI approach

Unsure about your role itself rather than the duties that come with it? Work out whether you are a provider or a deployer