Comparison
Article 4 versus Article 14: literacy and human oversight
The difference
Article 4 is about the people: providers and deployers have to take measures so that their staff are sufficiently AI literate, whatever the risk level of the system. Article 14 is about the system: a high-risk AI system has to be designed so that people can genuinely oversee it.
The official source remains authoritative. This is general interpretation and not legal advice about your situation.
The fields side by side
Every row comes from the objects themselves. Where a field is empty, it says so; we do not fill in an assumption where the source is silent.
Status
- Article 4, AI literacy
- Applicable
- Article 14, human oversight
- Upcoming
Applies from
- Article 4, AI literacy
- 2 February 2025
- Article 14, human oversight
- 2 December 2027
Who carries the duty
- Article 4, AI literacy
- Deployer, Provider of an AI system
- Article 14, human oversight
- Provider of an AI system
Who is affected
- Article 4, AI literacy
- Not recorded
- Article 14, human oversight
- Deployer
Who supervises
- Article 4, AI literacy
- Not recorded
- Article 14, human oversight
- Not recorded
When this applies
- Article 4, AI literacy
- The organisation is a provider or deployer of an AI system within scope.
- Article 14, human oversight
- The system is high-risk; the provider builds in oversight measures, the deployer assigns oversight to competent persons.
Exceptions
- Article 4, AI literacy
- The provision does not require a specific individual level to be guaranteed.
- Article 14, human oversight
- For remote biometric identification the reinforced requirement of verification by at least two authorised persons applies (Article 14(5)), with the exceptions listed there.
First actions
- Article 4, AI literacy
- Take role- and context-specific AI literacy measures
- Article 14, human oversight
- Design and assign effective human oversight
Evidence that belongs with it
- Article 4, AI literacy
- AI literacy measures record
- Article 14, human oversight
- Oversight file per system
Control
- Article 4, AI literacy
- Periodic role and context review
- Article 14, human oversight
- Oversight test before go-live
Version and review status
- Article 4, AI literacy
- v2.0.0, placed against the official source
- Article 14, human oversight
- v1.0.0, placed against the official source
Official sources and locators
Per side, the provisions the statements above rest on.
Article 4, AI literacy
Digital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amendment of Article 4; entry into force 27 July 2026
Open official sourceAI literacy questions and answers
Locator: Questions on measures, formats, certificates and records
Open official sourceAI literacy questions and answers
Locator: Implementation examples and evidence guidance
Open official source
Article 14, human oversight
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 14(1)-(5)
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
Open official source
Referring to these two objects
Each side has its own stable identifier, version and hash. Take them separately; you cite a comparison by citing the two objects.
Referring to this object
Citation block
Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.
Reference
Praxikon, "Article 4: AI literacy", praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-4-ai-literacy@2.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 7a9516670dfca5dd7dcc96ae019e5714f843e20235abd3e9d92b71eb42445ff1, https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-4-ai-literacy (https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-4-ai-literacy&effective_at=2026-07-27&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-24)
Short form
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-4-ai-literacy@2.0.0 (sha256 7a951667)
BibTeX
@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-obligation-article-4-ai-literacy-2-0-0,
author = {{Praxikon}},
title = {Article 4: AI literacy},
year = {2026},
version = {2.0.0},
number = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-4-ai-literacy},
howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
note = {effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 7a9516670dfca5dd7dcc96ae019e5714f843e20235abd3e9d92b71eb42445ff1},
url = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-4-ai-literacy},
urldate = {2026-08-24},
language = {en}
}CSL JSON
[
{
"id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-4-ai-literacy@2.0.0",
"type": "dataset",
"title": "Article 4: AI literacy",
"container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
"publisher": "Praxikon",
"version": "2.0.0",
"number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-4-ai-literacy",
"URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-4-ai-literacy",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
8
]
]
},
"accessed": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
24
]
]
},
"note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 7a9516670dfca5dd7dcc96ae019e5714f843e20235abd3e9d92b71eb42445ff1; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-4-ai-literacy&effective_at=2026-07-27&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
}
]How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms
Referring to this object
Citation block
Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.
Reference
Praxikon, "Article 14: human oversight", praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-14-human-oversight@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 02da6ce26c5036d2cdea0842564e14a1227cd8f8e5fe5e67e15b52cd5332f98b, https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-14-human-oversight (https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-14-human-oversight&effective_at=2026-07-27&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-24)
Short form
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-14-human-oversight@1.0.0 (sha256 02da6ce2)
BibTeX
@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-obligation-article-14-human-oversight-1-0-0,
author = {{Praxikon}},
title = {Article 14: human oversight},
year = {2026},
version = {1.0.0},
number = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-14-human-oversight},
howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
note = {effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 02da6ce26c5036d2cdea0842564e14a1227cd8f8e5fe5e67e15b52cd5332f98b},
url = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-14-human-oversight},
urldate = {2026-08-24},
language = {en}
}CSL JSON
[
{
"id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-14-human-oversight@1.0.0",
"type": "dataset",
"title": "Article 14: human oversight",
"container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
"publisher": "Praxikon",
"version": "1.0.0",
"number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-14-human-oversight",
"URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-14-human-oversight",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
8
]
]
},
"accessed": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
24
]
]
},
"note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 02da6ce26c5036d2cdea0842564e14a1227cd8f8e5fe5e67e15b52cd5332f98b; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-14-human-oversight&effective_at=2026-07-27&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
}
]How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms
Execution
Record per role who has to be able to do what
Once you know which of the two duties rests on you, the question becomes who in your organisation needs which knowledge. Praxikon does not deliver that training; LearnWize records per employee which training, guidance and assessment was completed, so the file holds up when it is asked for.
See LearnWizeOther comparisons
- Article 16 versus Article 26: what the provider owes and what the deployer owes
- Article 26 versus Article 27: using and assessing
- GPAI versus high-risk: the model or the use
- Article 5 versus Annex III: prohibited or high-risk
- Article 50 versus Article 13: two kinds of transparency
- Article 11 versus Article 13: technical documentation and instructions for use
Unsure about your role itself rather than the duties that come with it? Work out whether you are a provider or a deployer