Article 73: serious incident reporting
The duty to report serious incidents with high-risk AI, under strict deadlines.
The official source remains authoritative. This is general information about obligations and not legal advice. See this object on the map
Address and citation
This object has an address of its own that is never renamed or reused. Store the identifier in your own file, not the title or the link.
- Identifier
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-73-incident-reporting- Payload hash (sha256)
50ff870bf326acf58085d7a7c88cc7b5f38663837e21ac44d10ce88c5ee65eff
Citation line
Praxikon, "Article 73: serious incident reporting", praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-73-incident-reporting@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 50ff870bf326acf58085d7a7c88cc7b5f38663837e21ac44d10ce88c5ee65eff- Version
- 1.0.0
- Legal time (effective_at)
- 27 July 2026
- Knowledge time (known_at)
- 8 August 2026
- Closed on
- Not closed
- Application date
- 2 December 2027
- Topics
- post-market
Review status: Placed against the official source (8 August 2026). Next check due by 4 February 2027. The check date is the knowledge date of this version; no later recheck has been recorded.
Who must act and who is affected
On an obligation the addressee is recorded separately from the party that is merely affected. That difference decides who a supervisory authority addresses and who has work to do without the duty resting on them.
Duty holder
- Provider of an AI systempraxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider
Affected actor
- Deployerpraxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:deployer
Oversight
- Market surveillance authoritypraxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:market-surveillance-authority
Evidence owner
- Provider of an AI systempraxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider
What this object links to
Every relation appears below as a path: from the source with its locator, through the conditions and exceptions of the object carrying the relation, to the consequence. A locator belongs to a statement in the data and not to a relation, so the source is the source anchor of the carrying object.
Who carries the duty
1 of 1 shown
The duty rests on this role. A supervisory authority addresses this role when it is not met.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 73(1)-(11)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
- Condition | allA serious incident occurs with a high-risk system: death or serious harm to health, serious and irreversible disruption of critical infrastructure, infringement of fundamental-rights protections or serious damage to property or environment.
- ExceptionFor systems under sectoral reporting regimes with equivalent duties, reporting may run through that regime to avoid duplication.
As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.
Consequence
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider
Who is affected without being the addressee
1 of 1 shown
This role is practically affected without being the addressee: it receives the information, has to cooperate, or absorbs the consequences in its own process.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 73(1)-(11)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
- Condition | allA serious incident occurs with a high-risk system: death or serious harm to health, serious and irreversible disruption of critical infrastructure, infringement of fundamental-rights protections or serious damage to property or environment.
- ExceptionFor systems under sectoral reporting regimes with equivalent duties, reporting may run through that regime to avoid duplication.
As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.
Consequence
ActorDeployer
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:deployer
Who supervises this
1 of 1 shown
This role supervises and receives the notifications. It is the institutional role, not the national body that fills it.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 73(1)-(11)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
- Condition | allA serious incident occurs with a high-risk system: death or serious harm to health, serious and irreversible disruption of critical infrastructure, infringement of fundamental-rights protections or serious damage to property or environment.
- ExceptionFor systems under sectoral reporting regimes with equivalent duties, reporting may run through that regime to avoid duplication.
As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.
Consequence
ActorMarket surveillance authority
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:market-surveillance-authority
Who owns the evidence
1 of 1 shown
This duty holder creates, maintains and can produce the evidence.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 73(1)-(11)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
- Condition | allA serious incident occurs with a high-risk system: death or serious harm to health, serious and irreversible disruption of critical infrastructure, infringement of fundamental-rights protections or serious damage to property or environment.
- ExceptionFor systems under sectoral reporting regimes with equivalent duties, reporting may run through that regime to avoid duplication.
As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.
Consequence
praxikon:eu:ai-act:actor:provider
What has to be done
1 of 1 shown
This is what concretely has to be done under the obligation.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 73(1)-(11)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
- Condition | allA serious incident occurs with a high-risk system: death or serious harm to health, serious and irreversible disruption of critical infrastructure, infringement of fundamental-rights protections or serious damage to property or environment.
- ExceptionFor systems under sectoral reporting regimes with equivalent duties, reporting may run through that regime to avoid duplication.
As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.
Consequence
ActionSet up an incident process with reporting routes
praxikon:eu:ai-act:action:article-73-incident-reporting-act
What has to be recorded
1 of 1 shown
This is what has to be in the file to show that the action was carried out.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 73(1)-(11)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
- Condition | allA serious incident occurs with a high-risk system: death or serious harm to health, serious and irreversible disruption of critical infrastructure, infringement of fundamental-rights protections or serious damage to property or environment.
- ExceptionFor systems under sectoral reporting regimes with equivalent duties, reporting may run through that regime to avoid duplication.
As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.
Consequence
EvidenceIncident register and reports
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-73-incident-reporting-record
What keeps it in place
1 of 1 shown
This is what keeps compliance in place over time, periodic or event-driven.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 73(1)-(11)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
- Condition | allA serious incident occurs with a high-risk system: death or serious harm to health, serious and irreversible disruption of critical infrastructure, infringement of fundamental-rights protections or serious damage to property or environment.
- ExceptionFor systems under sectoral reporting regimes with equivalent duties, reporting may run through that regime to avoid duplication.
As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.
Consequence
ControlIncident drill and deadline watch
praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:article-73-incident-reporting-control
Public tools
1 of 1 shown
This is the public route a reader can actually use.
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 73(1)-(11)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
- Condition | allA serious incident occurs with a high-risk system: death or serious harm to health, serious and irreversible disruption of critical infrastructure, infringement of fundamental-rights protections or serious damage to property or environment.
- ExceptionFor systems under sectoral reporting regimes with equivalent duties, reporting may run through that regime to avoid duplication.
As long as this exception is not ruled out, the outcome stays conditional and you have to establish it yourself.
Consequence
TemplateFull text of Article 73
praxikon:eu:ai-act:template:article-73-incident-reporting-legal-text
What points at this object
Objects hanging off this obligation
7 of 7 shown
The object belongs to this obligation. The source line it hangs off sits there.
Source
This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 73(1)-(11)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Relation recorded on: Set up an incident process with reporting routes
Consequence
ActionSet up an incident process with reporting routes
praxikon:eu:ai-act:action:article-73-incident-reporting-act
Source
This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 73(1)-(11)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Relation recorded on: Incident drill and deadline watch
Consequence
ControlIncident drill and deadline watch
praxikon:eu:ai-act:control:article-73-incident-reporting-control
Source
This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 73(1)-(11)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Relation recorded on: Incident register and reports
Consequence
EvidenceIncident register and reports
praxikon:eu:ai-act:evidence:article-73-incident-reporting-record
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 3(49), Article 26(5) and Article 73(1), (2) and (6)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Relation recorded on: Performance scoring for staff goes wrong: report or not
Consequence
ExamplePerformance scoring for staff goes wrong: report or not
praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-beoordelingssysteem-personeel-incidentmelding
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 73(1), (2), (4) and (6), and Article 26(5)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Relation recorded on: Serious incident on the production line: who reports and within what deadline
Consequence
ExampleSerious incident on the production line: who reports and within what deadline
praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-ernstig-incident-productielijn-meldtermijn
Source
Official fact on this object, with its locator.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 3(49), Article 26(5) and Article 73(1), (2), (5) and (7)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official source
Via
No condition or exception recorded on this object.
Relation recorded on: Proctoring during an exam overshoots: from signal to reporting duty
Consequence
ExampleProctoring during an exam overshoots: from signal to reporting duty
praxikon:eu:ai-act:example:example-proctoring-tentamen-incidentmelding
Source
This object carries no official fact of its own. The source line below sits on the obligation it hangs off; the link itself is recorded editorially.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 73(1)-(11)
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744
Open official source
Consequence
TemplateFull text of Article 73
praxikon:eu:ai-act:template:article-73-incident-reporting-legal-text
What this object states
Official fact
Attributable to a named primary source, with a locator. Where they differ, the official source prevails.
Article 73 obliges providers to report serious incidents to the market surveillance authority: immediately after establishing the causal link and at the latest within 15 days, shortened to 10 days in the event of death and to 2 days for widespread infringement or serious disruption of critical infrastructure. Deployers inform the provider without delay.
- Locator: Article 73(1)-(11)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689Open official source
For the Annex III route this requirement applies from 2 December 2027; for high-risk AI in regulated products (Annex I) from 2 August 2028.
- Locator: Amended Article 113 application datespraxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2026-1744Open official source
Our interpretation
Our own reading. It can change without the law changing, and it is not the position of a supervisory authority.
The deadlines are too short to design the process during the incident: those who decide who reports at the first incident will not make 15 days, let alone 2. This is the GDPR breach playbook, but for AI.
- Locator: Article 73(1)-(11)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689Open official source
Recommended step
A practical step we consider appropriate. Not an obligation following from the Regulation.
Connect the AI incident process to the existing breach and security process and add the AI-specific definitions and deadlines.
- Locator: Article 73(1)-(11)praxikon:eu:ai-act:source:reg-eu-2024-1689Open official source
When this applies
- 1A serious incident occurs with a high-risk system: death or serious harm to health, serious and irreversible disruption of critical infrastructure, infringement of fundamental-rights protections or serious damage to property or environment.
When this does not apply
- For systems under sectoral reporting regimes with equivalent duties, reporting may run through that regime to avoid duplication.
Referring to this object
Citation block
Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.
Reference
Praxikon, "Article 73: serious incident reporting", praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-73-incident-reporting@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 50ff870bf326acf58085d7a7c88cc7b5f38663837e21ac44d10ce88c5ee65eff, https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/obligation/article-73-incident-reporting (https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-73-incident-reporting&effective_at=2026-07-27&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-25)
Short form
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-73-incident-reporting@1.0.0 (sha256 50ff870b)
BibTeX
@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-obligation-article-73-incident-reporting-1-0-0,
author = {{Praxikon}},
title = {Article 73: serious incident reporting},
year = {2026},
version = {1.0.0},
number = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-73-incident-reporting},
howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
note = {effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 50ff870bf326acf58085d7a7c88cc7b5f38663837e21ac44d10ce88c5ee65eff},
url = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/obligation/article-73-incident-reporting},
urldate = {2026-08-25},
language = {en}
}CSL JSON
[
{
"id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-73-incident-reporting@1.0.0",
"type": "dataset",
"title": "Article 73: serious incident reporting",
"container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
"publisher": "Praxikon",
"version": "1.0.0",
"number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-73-incident-reporting",
"URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verkenner/obligation/article-73-incident-reporting",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
8
]
]
},
"accessed": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
25
]
]
},
"note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 50ff870bf326acf58085d7a7c88cc7b5f38663837e21ac44d10ce88c5ee65eff; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-73-incident-reporting&effective_at=2026-07-27&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
}
]How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms
For agents and integrations
This page and the machine output come from the same object and the same two time axes.