Comparison
Article 12 versus Article 72: logging and post-market monitoring
The difference
Article 12 is about the recording itself: a high-risk AI system has to log events automatically so that its behaviour can be traced afterwards. Article 72 is about what happens with that recording: after placing the system on the market the provider has to keep actively monitoring it and use what that produces.
The official source remains authoritative. This is general interpretation and not legal advice about your situation.
The fields side by side
Every row comes from the objects themselves. Where a field is empty, it says so; we do not fill in an assumption where the source is silent.
Status
- Article 12, recording
- Upcoming
- Article 72, monitoring
- Upcoming
Applies from
- Article 12, recording
- 2 December 2027
- Article 72, monitoring
- 2 December 2027
Who carries the duty
- Article 12, recording
- Provider of an AI system
- Article 72, monitoring
- Provider of an AI system
Who is affected
- Article 12, recording
- Deployer
- Article 72, monitoring
- Deployer
Who supervises
- Article 12, recording
- Not recorded
- Article 72, monitoring
- Not recorded
When this applies
- Article 12, recording
- The system is high-risk; the provider designs the logging, provider and deployer retain the logs under their control.
- Article 72, monitoring
- The provider has a high-risk system on the market; deployers supply the real-world data via monitoring and signals.
Exceptions
- Article 12, recording
- The retention period may be limited by Union or national law, including data protection.
- Article 72, monitoring
- The plan may be proportionate to the nature of the system and align with existing sectoral monitoring regimes.
First actions
- Article 12, recording
- Design logging into the system
- Article 72, monitoring
- Draw up a post-market monitoring plan
Evidence that belongs with it
- Article 12, recording
- Logs and retention regime
- Article 72, monitoring
- Monitoring plan and reports
Control
- Article 12, recording
- Periodic log review
- Article 72, monitoring
- Signal-to-action loop
Version and review status
- Article 12, recording
- v1.0.0, placed against the official source
- Article 72, monitoring
- v1.0.0, placed against the official source
Official sources and locators
Per side, the provisions the statements above rest on.
Article 12, recording
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 12, Article 19 and Article 26(6)
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
Open official source
Article 72, monitoring
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024/1689
Locator: Article 72(1)-(4)
Open official sourceDigital Omnibus on AI 2026/1744
Locator: Amended Article 113 application dates
Open official source
Referring to these two objects
Each side has its own stable identifier, version and hash. Take them separately; you cite a comparison by citing the two objects.
Referring to this object
Citation block
Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.
Reference
Praxikon, "Article 12: logging and traceability", praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-12-logging@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 92daf8448d3471e5014ea66a2dc2731909f2689e5e3bdb243f49a75572002f20, https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-12-logging (https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-12-logging&effective_at=2026-07-27&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-24)
Short form
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-12-logging@1.0.0 (sha256 92daf844)
BibTeX
@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-obligation-article-12-logging-1-0-0,
author = {{Praxikon}},
title = {Article 12: logging and traceability},
year = {2026},
version = {1.0.0},
number = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-12-logging},
howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
note = {effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 92daf8448d3471e5014ea66a2dc2731909f2689e5e3bdb243f49a75572002f20},
url = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-12-logging},
urldate = {2026-08-24},
language = {en}
}CSL JSON
[
{
"id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-12-logging@1.0.0",
"type": "dataset",
"title": "Article 12: logging and traceability",
"container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
"publisher": "Praxikon",
"version": "1.0.0",
"number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-12-logging",
"URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-12-logging",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
8
]
]
},
"accessed": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
24
]
]
},
"note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 92daf8448d3471e5014ea66a2dc2731909f2689e5e3bdb243f49a75572002f20; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-12-logging&effective_at=2026-07-27&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
}
]How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms
Referring to this object
Citation block
Copy this reference into your advice, article or file. The identifier, the version and the hash keep the statement findable later, even once the dataset has moved on.
Reference
Praxikon, "Article 72: post-market monitoring", praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-72-post-market-monitoring@1.0.0, dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0 (schema 1.4.0), effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z, known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z, sha256 b635803b8ca4eff99ebd690c91d90d1ffbbe107fee55345d457d855f2340e2a5, https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-72-post-market-monitoring (https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-72-post-market-monitoring&effective_at=2026-07-27&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en, accessed 2026-08-24)
Short form
praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-72-post-market-monitoring@1.0.0 (sha256 b635803b)
BibTeX
@misc{praxikon-eu-ai-act-obligation-article-72-post-market-monitoring-1-0-0,
author = {{Praxikon}},
title = {Article 72: post-market monitoring},
year = {2026},
version = {1.0.0},
number = {praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-72-post-market-monitoring},
howpublished = {AI Act Change \& Evidence Graph, dataset 2.1.0, schema 1.4.0},
note = {effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 b635803b8ca4eff99ebd690c91d90d1ffbbe107fee55345d457d855f2340e2a5},
url = {https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-72-post-market-monitoring},
urldate = {2026-08-24},
language = {en}
}CSL JSON
[
{
"id": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-72-post-market-monitoring@1.0.0",
"type": "dataset",
"title": "Article 72: post-market monitoring",
"container-title": "AI Act Change & Evidence Graph",
"publisher": "Praxikon",
"version": "1.0.0",
"number": "praxikon:eu:ai-act:obligation:article-72-post-market-monitoring",
"URL": "https://www.praxikon.com/en/verplichtingen/article-72-post-market-monitoring",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
8
]
]
},
"accessed": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
24
]
]
},
"note": "dataset praxikon:sys:registry:dataset:ai-act-implementation-graph 2.1.0; schema 1.4.0; effective_at 2026-07-27T00:00:00.000Z; known_at 2026-08-08T00:00:00.000Z; sha256 b635803b8ca4eff99ebd690c91d90d1ffbbe107fee55345d457d855f2340e2a5; retrieved_from https://www.praxikon.com/api/v1/obligations?id=praxikon%3Aeu%3Aai-act%3Aobligation%3Aarticle-72-post-market-monitoring&effective_at=2026-07-27&known_at=2026-08-08&lang=en; licence https://www.praxikon.com/nl/legal/terms"
}
]How to verify a reference later is set out in the methodology. Terms
Execution
Put the evidence where it will be asked for
Two duties that look alike rarely produce the same piece of evidence, and you notice that difference only once a supervisory authority or a client asks. Praxikon does not carry that out; Embed AI maps scope, ownership and recording per system.
See the Embed AI approachOther comparisons
- Article 16 versus Article 26: what the provider owes and what the deployer owes
- Article 26 versus Article 27: using and assessing
- Article 4 versus Article 14: literacy and human oversight
- GPAI versus high-risk: the model or the use
- Article 5 versus Annex III: prohibited or high-risk
- Article 50 versus Article 13: two kinds of transparency
Unsure about your role itself rather than the duties that come with it? Work out whether you are a provider or a deployer