Guideline
Guidelines 03/2026 on web scraping in the context of generative AI
- Date
- Status
- under consultation
- Body
- European Data Protection Board (EDPB)
- Reference
- Guidelines 03/2026, versie 1.0
What it is about
Version 1.0 was adopted on 7 July 2026 for public consultation; comments can be submitted until 30 October 2026 (23:59 CET). The guidelines cover private entities scraping data from websites to train generative AI, either themselves or through a contracted party. They address roles (controller or processor), purpose limitation, transparency (including the Article 14(5)(b) disproportionate effort exception), data minimisation, accuracy, legitimate interest as legal basis with the balancing test and mitigating measures, and special categories of data, where the GC and Others ruling (C-136/17) can be relevant for incidental collection.
What this means in practice
If you scrape web data for AI yourself on the basis of legitimate interest, you must be able to demonstrate the balancing test, and it helps to exclude sources and data types you do not need, skip websites that refuse scraping and give people a way to object in advance. If you use an already scraped dataset, you as controller assess whether it can lawfully be used and must meet the accountability principle. You must actively try to keep out special category data. It is still a draft; the final text may differ.
The GDPR articles concerned
- Article 5: Principles relating to processing of personal data
- Article 6: Lawfulness of processing
- Article 9: Processing of special categories of personal data
- Article 14: Information to be provided where personal data have not been obtained from the data subject
- Article 35: Data protection impact assessment
Source: EDPB public consultation pagechecked on 15 September 2026
Summary and practical reading by Praxikon. Not legal advice; the source prevails.
Connections
What connects to this development
Themes where this returns
- Assessing risks in advance: DPIA and FRIA
- Automated decisions and human oversight
- Biometrics and emotion recognition
- Data quality, minimisation and data governance
- Keeping records: record of processing, technical documentation and logs
- Transparency: informing people
- Using special categories of personal data to detect bias
The counterpart in the other law
- Article 2 AI Act: Scope
via Using special categories of personal data to detect bias
- Article 3 AI Act: Definitions
- Article 5 AI Act: Prohibited AI practices
- Article 6 AI Act: Classification rules for high-risk AI systems
- Article 9 AI Act: Risk management system
- Article 10 AI Act: Data and data governance
- Article 11 AI Act: Technical documentation
via Keeping records: record of processing, technical documentation and logs
- Article 12 AI Act: Record-keeping
via Keeping records: record of processing, technical documentation and logs
- Article 14 AI Act: Human oversight
- Article 18 AI Act: Documentation keeping
via Keeping records: record of processing, technical documentation and logs
- Article 19 AI Act: Automatically generated logs
via Keeping records: record of processing, technical documentation and logs
- Article 26 AI Act: Obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systems
via Keeping records: record of processing, technical documentation and logs
- Article 27 AI Act: Fundamental rights impact assessment for high-risk AI systems
- Article 50 AI Act: Transparency obligations for providers and deployers of certain AI systems
- Article 86 AI Act: Right to explanation of individual decision-making
Case law8 of 15
- Noord-Nederland District Court upholds DPA fine for village livestream, reduces it to 375 euros
2025-01-09 · status not established, Rechtbank Noord-Nederland
- Schrems v Meta: no unlimited retention and aggregation of data for targeted advertising
2024-10-04 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Vierde kamer), Maximilian Schrems tegen Meta Platforms Ireland Limited
- Interim relief judge: DPA must redact fine amount when giving an enforcement decision to complainants
2024-05-31 · status not established, Rechtbank Den Haag, voorzieningenrechter (kort geding, team handel)
- Council of State: 600,000 euro fine for wifi tracking in Enschede stays annulled
2026-07-29 · final, Raad van State, Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak
- Mousse: asking for Mr or Ms when selling a train ticket is not necessary
2025-01-09 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Eerste kamer), Mousse tegen Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) en SNCF Connect
- Overijssel District Court revokes DPA fine for wifi tracking in Enschede
2024-02-02 · final, Rechtbank Overijssel
- The Hague District Court cuts DPA fine on police for mobile camera cars without completed DPIA to 30,000 euros
2024-10-08 · status not established, Rechtbank Den Haag
- EU Court of Justice in KNLTB: a purely commercial interest can be a legitimate interest
2024-10-04 · final, Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie
Guidelines8 of 16
- Guidelines 1/2024 on processing of personal data based on Article 6(1)(f) GDPR (legitimate interest)
2024-10-08 · adopted, European Data Protection Board (EDPB)
- Opinion 28/2024 on certain data protection aspects related to the processing of personal data in the context of AI models
2024-12-17 · final, European Data Protection Board (EDPB)
- Guidelines 05/2020 on consent under Regulation 2016/679
2020-05-04 · final, European Data Protection Board (EDPB)
- Consultation on the draft list of processing operations for which no DPIA is required (Dutch DPA)
2026-06-24 · under consultation, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP)
- Guidelines 02/2025 on processing of personal data through blockchain technologies
2026-07-07 · final, European Data Protection Board (EDPB)
- Guidelines 1/2026 on processing of personal data for scientific research purposes
2026-04-15 · adopted, European Data Protection Board (EDPB)
- EDPB Template for Data Protection Impact Assessment
2026-04-14 · under consultation, European Data Protection Board (EDPB)
- Dutch DPA (AP) publishes position paper on the Digital Omnibus and the AI Omnibus
2026-01-13 · final, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
Enforcement and fines8 of 13
- Ten municipalities fined a total of 250,000 euros for unlawful files on Muslim residents
2026-02-03 · final, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
- Experian Netherlands fined 2.7 million euros for credit scoring without legal basis or information
2025-10-16 · final, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
- Dutch DPA and tennis federation KNLTB end litigation: fine cut from 525,000 to at most 250,000 euros
2025-10-18 · status not established, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
- 600,000 euro fine for AS Watson (Kruidvat) over tracking cookies without consent
2024-05-02 · annulled, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
- 500 euro fine and penalty order for Stichting Oud Lemmer over webcam livestream
2021-07-09 · status not established, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
- DPA cuts Kruidvat fine to 50,000 euros on objection
2025-05-27 · status not established, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
- Coolblue fined 40,000 euros on objection for cookies without consent
2024-12-23 · status not established, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
- Clearview AI: 30.5 million euro fine and penalty orders for illegal facial database
2024-05-16 · final, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
Legislation in motion6 of 9
- Proposal: exception for biometric verification under the data subject's sole control (Article 9(2)(l) GDPR)
2025-11-19 · proposal, Europese Commissie
- Council: Irish Presidency continues with a revised compromise, Antici Group 11 September 2026
2026-09-11 · under negotiation, Raad van de Europese Unie, Iers voorzitterschap
- Proposal: definition of scientific research, purpose limitation and information duty for research (Article 4(38), 5(1)(b) and 13(5) GDPR)
2025-11-19 · under negotiation, Europese Commissie
- Proposal: exception for incidental special category data in AI development (Article 9(2)(k) and 9(5) GDPR)
2025-11-19 · proposal, Europese Commissie
- Proposal: legitimate interest for development and operation of AI (new Article 88c GDPR)
2025-11-19 · proposal, Europese Commissie
- Proposal: cookie rules move from ePrivacy to the GDPR, with new exceptions and a six-month rule (new Article 88a GDPR and Article 5(3) ePrivacy)
2025-11-19 · under negotiation, Europese Commissie
Analysis6 of 7
- AI DPIA: when it's required + free template (2026)
2026-03-23
- EU AI Act Article 26: deployer obligations explained
2026-03-21
- DPIA vs FRIA: 5 key differences, when you need both, plus a free FRIA template (2026)
2025-08-05
- AI Act regulator inspection: which documents must your organisation be able to show?
2026-07-07
- What is FRIA? Fundamental rights impact assessment explained (EU AI Act)
2026-02-28
- EU AI Act in the public sector: 2025 government guide
2025-06-16