Enforcement
Dutch DPA study: algorithms and AI at debt collection agencies
- Date
- Status
- final
- Body
- Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
- Reference
- Onderzoeksrapport Automatische incasso: algoritmes en AI bij incassobureaus (29 bureaus)
What it is about
The Dutch DPA studied 29 debt collection agencies. They already use algorithms and AI widely, also for core processes: estimating the chance of collecting, enriching files, detecting vulnerability, analysing phone calls and setting the channel and frequency of contact. The DPA considers it plausible that prohibited fully automated decision-making occurs in practice without agencies realising it. Some use too narrow a definition of personal data and they rarely inform debtors actively. This is a sector study with recommendations, not a fine or a binding decision.
What this means in practice
If you use AI in debt collection, the DPA names five points: map which personal data you process and test the legal basis and necessity, actively inform debtors about the algorithms and their rights, ensure meaningful human intervention in decisions with significant effects, agree terms with suppliers and check them, and manage the risks. According to the DPA, systems that assess creditworthiness or the willingness to meet payment obligations are high risk; whoever develops them must meet the requirements from 2 December 2027. Registration for the round table of 2 December 2026 is open until 11 November 2026.
The GDPR articles concerned
- Article 5: Principles relating to processing of personal data
- Article 6: Lawfulness of processing
- Article 13: Information to be provided where personal data are collected from the data subject
- Article 14: Information to be provided where personal data have not been obtained from the data subject
- Article 22: Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
- Article 28: Processor
Source: Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, AP informeert incassobureaus over verantwoorde inzet AI (met onderzoeksrapport als PDF)checked on 5 November 2026
Summary and practical reading by Praxikon. Not legal advice; the source prevails.
Connections
What connects to this development
Themes where this returns
The counterpart in the other law
- Article 3 AI Act: Definitions
- Article 10 AI Act: Data and data governance
- Article 11 AI Act: Technical documentation
via Keeping records: record of processing, technical documentation and logs
- Article 12 AI Act: Record-keeping
via Keeping records: record of processing, technical documentation and logs
- Article 14 AI Act: Human oversight
- Article 16 AI Act: Obligations of providers of high-risk AI systems
- Article 18 AI Act: Documentation keeping
via Keeping records: record of processing, technical documentation and logs
- Article 19 AI Act: Automatically generated logs
via Keeping records: record of processing, technical documentation and logs
- Article 25 AI Act: Responsibilities along the AI value chain
- Article 26 AI Act: Obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systems
via Keeping records: record of processing, technical documentation and logs
- Article 50 AI Act: Transparency obligations for providers and deployers of certain AI systems
- Article 86 AI Act: Right to explanation of individual decision-making
Case law8 of 15
- SCHUFA: a credit score on which third parties draw strongly is automated decision-making
2023-12-07 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Eerste kamer), OQ tegen Land Hessen, met SCHUFA Holding AG als interveniënt
- Noord-Nederland District Court upholds DPA fine for village livestream, reduces it to 375 euros
2025-01-09 · status not established, Rechtbank Noord-Nederland
- Interim relief judge: DPA must redact fine amount when giving an enforcement decision to complainants
2024-05-31 · status not established, Rechtbank Den Haag, voorzieningenrechter (kort geding, team handel)
- Council of State: 600,000 euro fine for wifi tracking in Enschede stays annulled
2026-07-29 · final, Raad van State, Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak
- EDPS v SRB: pseudonymised data are not always personal data for everyone, but the information duty applies from collection
2025-09-04 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Eerste kamer), Europese Toezichthouder voor gegevensbescherming (EDPS) tegen Gemeenschappelijke Afwikkelingsraad (SRB)
- Mousse: asking for Mr or Ms when selling a train ticket is not necessary
2025-01-09 · final, Hof van Justitie van de EU (Eerste kamer), Mousse tegen Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) en SNCF Connect
- Overijssel District Court revokes DPA fine for wifi tracking in Enschede
2024-02-02 · final, Rechtbank Overijssel
- EU Court of Justice in KNLTB: a purely commercial interest can be a legitimate interest
2024-10-04 · final, Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie
Guidelines8 of 15
- Guidelines 1/2024 on processing of personal data based on Article 6(1)(f) GDPR (legitimate interest)
2024-10-08 · under consultation, European Data Protection Board (EDPB)
- EDPB Statement 1/2026 on smart glasses
2026-10-13 · final, European Data Protection Board (EDPB)
- Guidelines 03/2026 on web scraping in the context of generative AI
2026-07-07 · under consultation, European Data Protection Board (EDPB)
- Opinion 28/2024 on certain data protection aspects related to the processing of personal data in the context of AI models
2024-12-17 · final, European Data Protection Board (EDPB)
- Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679
2018-05-25 · final, Article 29 Working Party, bekrachtigd door de European Data Protection Board (EDPB)
- Guidelines on Automated individual decision-making and Profiling for the purposes of Regulation 2016/679
2018-05-25 · final, Article 29 Working Party, bekrachtigd door de European Data Protection Board (EDPB)
- Guidelines 02/2025 on processing of personal data through blockchain technologies
2026-07-07 · final, European Data Protection Board (EDPB)
- Guidelines 1/2026 on processing of personal data for scientific research purposes
2026-04-15 · under consultation, European Data Protection Board (EDPB)
Enforcement and fines8 of 14
- Dutch DPA fines Uber 824.99 million euros for automated driver deactivation
2026-08-21 · under appeal, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
- Experian Netherlands fined 2.7 million euros for credit scoring without legal basis or information
2025-10-16 · final, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
- Dutch DPA and tennis federation KNLTB end litigation: fine cut from 525,000 to at most 250,000 euros
2025-10-18 · status not established, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
- 600,000 euro fine for AS Watson (Kruidvat) over tracking cookies without consent
2024-05-02 · annulled, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
- 500 euro fine and penalty order for Stichting Oud Lemmer over webcam livestream
2021-07-09 · status not established, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
- DPA cuts Kruidvat fine to 50,000 euros on objection
2025-05-27 · status not established, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
- Ten municipalities fined a total of 250,000 euros for unlawful files on Muslim residents
2026-02-03 · final, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
- Coolblue fined 40,000 euros on objection for cookies without consent
2024-12-23 · status not established, Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
Legislation in motion6 of 10
- Proposal: definition of scientific research, purpose limitation and information duty for research (Article 4(38), 5(1)(b) and 13(5) GDPR)
2025-11-19 · under negotiation, Europese Commissie
- Proposal: no information duty in clear, non data-intensive relationships (Article 13(4) GDPR)
2025-11-19 · proposal, Europese Commissie
- Proposal: reformulation of automated individual decision-making (Article 22 GDPR)
2025-11-19 · proposal, Europese Commissie
- European Parliament: joint ITRE-LIBE draft report, amendments tabled, no committee vote yet
2026-06-22 · under negotiation, Europees Parlement, commissies ITRE en LIBE (gezamenlijke commissie)
- Proposal: exception for biometric verification under the data subject's sole control (Article 9(2)(l) GDPR)
2025-11-19 · proposal, Europese Commissie
- Proposal: legitimate interest for development and operation of AI (new Article 88c GDPR)
2025-11-19 · proposal, Europese Commissie
Analysis6 of 13
- Agentic AI under the EU AI Act: how to govern autonomous agents
2026-07-07
- AI agents and GDPR Article 22: no hard stop, no consent fix
2026-10-14
- Buying an AI agent: what to put in the contract
2026-11-05
- AI agents and the GDPR: what you need to arrange
2026-11-05
- The agent register: what to record for each AI agent
2026-11-05
- AI agents in a Dutch municipality: a governance plan in five steps
2026-11-05